Rahul N Doshi, James E Ip, Pascal Defaye, Vivek Y Reddy, Derek V Exner, Robert Canby, Morio Shoda, Maria Grazia Bongiorni, Gerhard Hindricks, Petr Neuzil, Thomas Callahan, Sri Sundaram, Daniel F Booth, Louis-Philippe Richer, Nima Badie, Reinoud E Knops
{"title":"Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker Implant Procedure Outcomes: Insights from the AVEIR DR i2i Study.","authors":"Rahul N Doshi, James E Ip, Pascal Defaye, Vivek Y Reddy, Derek V Exner, Robert Canby, Morio Shoda, Maria Grazia Bongiorni, Gerhard Hindricks, Petr Neuzil, Thomas Callahan, Sri Sundaram, Daniel F Booth, Louis-Philippe Richer, Nima Badie, Reinoud E Knops","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initial results were recently reported for the AVEIR DR i2i study which involved the percutaneous implantation of a novel dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system, with right atrial (RA) and ventricular (RV) LPs delivering atrioventricular synchronous pacing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate procedural outcomes and learning curve for de novo implantation of the dual-chamber LP (AVEIR DR™, Abbott).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Implant procedure metrics collected during the study were analyzed, including procedural complications within 30 days post-implant. Procedural outcomes were evaluated according to implanter experience: 1-4 vs. 9+ dual-chamber LP implant procedures (i.e., initial vs. advanced implant experience).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>De novo dual-chamber LPs were successfully implanted in 446/452 (98.7%) patients by 126 physicians. Mean procedural duration metrics included 90±37 min introducer sheath insertion-to-removal time, 74±32 min dual-chamber procedure, 26±17 min RV LP procedure, 42±24 min RA LP procedure, and 20±13 min fluoroscopy use; between initial vs. advanced implant experience, there were reductions of 19-36% (P<0.05) in these duration metrics. There were 62 procedural complications in 50/452 (11.1%) patients (i.e., 88.9% complication free), predominantly involving cardiac arrhythmias (i.e., atrial fibrillation/flutter or complete atrioventricular block; 16/452, 3.5%). Freedom from complication significantly improved from 88.5% to 97.6% of patients (P<0.05) when comparing initial vs. advanced implant experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a pivotal investigational study, implantation of a dual-chamber LP system was successful in 98.7% of patients. Advanced implant experience was accompanied by improvements in procedural outcomes including reduced procedural times (introducer sheath insertion-to-removal, dual-chamber procedure, VLP and ALP procedures, and fluoroscopy) and improved freedom from complication.</p>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Initial results were recently reported for the AVEIR DR i2i study which involved the percutaneous implantation of a novel dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system, with right atrial (RA) and ventricular (RV) LPs delivering atrioventricular synchronous pacing.
Objective: Evaluate procedural outcomes and learning curve for de novo implantation of the dual-chamber LP (AVEIR DR™, Abbott).
Methods: Implant procedure metrics collected during the study were analyzed, including procedural complications within 30 days post-implant. Procedural outcomes were evaluated according to implanter experience: 1-4 vs. 9+ dual-chamber LP implant procedures (i.e., initial vs. advanced implant experience).
Results: De novo dual-chamber LPs were successfully implanted in 446/452 (98.7%) patients by 126 physicians. Mean procedural duration metrics included 90±37 min introducer sheath insertion-to-removal time, 74±32 min dual-chamber procedure, 26±17 min RV LP procedure, 42±24 min RA LP procedure, and 20±13 min fluoroscopy use; between initial vs. advanced implant experience, there were reductions of 19-36% (P<0.05) in these duration metrics. There were 62 procedural complications in 50/452 (11.1%) patients (i.e., 88.9% complication free), predominantly involving cardiac arrhythmias (i.e., atrial fibrillation/flutter or complete atrioventricular block; 16/452, 3.5%). Freedom from complication significantly improved from 88.5% to 97.6% of patients (P<0.05) when comparing initial vs. advanced implant experience.
Conclusions: In a pivotal investigational study, implantation of a dual-chamber LP system was successful in 98.7% of patients. Advanced implant experience was accompanied by improvements in procedural outcomes including reduced procedural times (introducer sheath insertion-to-removal, dual-chamber procedure, VLP and ALP procedures, and fluoroscopy) and improved freedom from complication.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.