Rahul N. Doshi MD, FACC, FHRS , James E. Ip MD, FHRS , Pascal Defaye MD , Vivek Y. Reddy MD , Derek V. Exner MD, MPH, FHRS , Robert Canby MD, FHRS , Morio Shoda MD, PhD , Maria Grazia Bongiorni MD , Gerhard Hindricks MD , Petr Neuzil MD, PhD , Thomas Callahan MD, FHRS , Sri Sundaram MD, FHRS , Daniel F. Booth MEng , Louis-Philippe Richer PhD , Nima Badie PhD , Reinoud E. Knops MD, PhD
{"title":"Dual-chamber leadless pacemaker implant procedural outcomes: Insights from the AVEIR DR i2i study","authors":"Rahul N. Doshi MD, FACC, FHRS , James E. Ip MD, FHRS , Pascal Defaye MD , Vivek Y. Reddy MD , Derek V. Exner MD, MPH, FHRS , Robert Canby MD, FHRS , Morio Shoda MD, PhD , Maria Grazia Bongiorni MD , Gerhard Hindricks MD , Petr Neuzil MD, PhD , Thomas Callahan MD, FHRS , Sri Sundaram MD, FHRS , Daniel F. Booth MEng , Louis-Philippe Richer PhD , Nima Badie PhD , Reinoud E. Knops MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.03.1941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Initial results were recently reported for the AVEIR DR i2i study, which involved the percutaneous implantation of a novel dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system, with right atrial and right ventricular LPs delivering atrioventricular synchronous pacing.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate procedural outcomes and learning curve for de novo implantation of the dual-chamber LP (AVEIR DR, Abbott, Abbott Park, IL).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Implant procedure metrics collected during the study were analyzed, including procedural complications within 30 days of implantation. Procedural outcomes were evaluated according to implanter experience: 1–4 vs 9+ dual-chamber LP implant procedures (ie, initial vs advanced implant experience).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>De novo dual-chamber LPs were successfully implanted in 446 of 452 patients (99%) by 126 physicians. Mean procedural duration metrics included 90±37 minutes of introducer sheath insertion-to-removal time, 74±32 minutes of dual-chamber procedure duration, 26±17 minutes of right ventricular LP procedure duration, 42±24 minutes of right atrial LP procedure duration, and 20±13 minutes of fluoroscopy duration; between initial and advanced implant experience, there were reductions of 19%–36% (<em>P</em><.05) in these duration metrics. There were 62 procedural complications in 50 of 452 patients (11.1%) (ie, 88.9% complication free), predominantly involving cardiac arrhythmias (ie, atrial fibrillation/flutter or complete atrioventricular block; 16 of 452 [3.5%]). Freedom from complications significantly improved from 89% to 98% of patients (<em>P</em><.05) when comparing initial and advanced implant experience.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In a pivotal investigational study, implantation of a dual-chamber LP system was successful in 99% of patients. Advanced implant experience was accompanied by improvements in procedural outcomes including reduced procedural times (introducer sheath insertion to removal, dual-chamber procedure, ventricular LP and atrial LP procedures, and fluoroscopy) and improved freedom from complications.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div><span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> identifier: <span><span>NCT05252702</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 9","pages":"Pages 2391-2400"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125021769","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Initial results were recently reported for the AVEIR DR i2i study, which involved the percutaneous implantation of a novel dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system, with right atrial and right ventricular LPs delivering atrioventricular synchronous pacing.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to evaluate procedural outcomes and learning curve for de novo implantation of the dual-chamber LP (AVEIR DR, Abbott, Abbott Park, IL).
Methods
Implant procedure metrics collected during the study were analyzed, including procedural complications within 30 days of implantation. Procedural outcomes were evaluated according to implanter experience: 1–4 vs 9+ dual-chamber LP implant procedures (ie, initial vs advanced implant experience).
Results
De novo dual-chamber LPs were successfully implanted in 446 of 452 patients (99%) by 126 physicians. Mean procedural duration metrics included 90±37 minutes of introducer sheath insertion-to-removal time, 74±32 minutes of dual-chamber procedure duration, 26±17 minutes of right ventricular LP procedure duration, 42±24 minutes of right atrial LP procedure duration, and 20±13 minutes of fluoroscopy duration; between initial and advanced implant experience, there were reductions of 19%–36% (P<.05) in these duration metrics. There were 62 procedural complications in 50 of 452 patients (11.1%) (ie, 88.9% complication free), predominantly involving cardiac arrhythmias (ie, atrial fibrillation/flutter or complete atrioventricular block; 16 of 452 [3.5%]). Freedom from complications significantly improved from 89% to 98% of patients (P<.05) when comparing initial and advanced implant experience.
Conclusion
In a pivotal investigational study, implantation of a dual-chamber LP system was successful in 99% of patients. Advanced implant experience was accompanied by improvements in procedural outcomes including reduced procedural times (introducer sheath insertion to removal, dual-chamber procedure, ventricular LP and atrial LP procedures, and fluoroscopy) and improved freedom from complications.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.