Moving Toward a More Comprehensive Standard for Sex Education: A Latent Class Analysis and Examination of Young Adult Sexual Health.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Sex Research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1080/00224499.2025.2475549
Tracy M Scull, K N Stump, R Evans-Paulson, C V Dodson, A M Schoemann
{"title":"Moving Toward a More Comprehensive Standard for Sex Education: A Latent Class Analysis and Examination of Young Adult Sexual Health.","authors":"Tracy M Scull, K N Stump, R Evans-Paulson, C V Dodson, A M Schoemann","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2025.2475549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While sex education has been linked to adolescent health, few studies have examined how comprehensiveness of school-based sex education may promote young adult sexual wellbeing. The current study used latent class analysis to examine patterns in the comprehensiveness of topics included in sex education among a national sample of young adults (<i>N</i> = 676). Many participants had not received sex education (40%) or had received sex education that was focused on abstinence (20%) or sexual risks (25%). Only 15% had received comprehensive sex education (likely to cover a range of topics, including condoms/contraception, sexual communication, gender, sexual orientation, pleasure, consent, etc.). Analyses examined how class membership related to sexual health. Compared to all other groups, young adults that had received the most comprehensive sex education were more likely to use condoms and communicate with their partners about STIs. They were also more likely to have had an STI test (compared to those who received other types of sex education) and reported greater sexual satisfaction (compared to those who received no sex education). Those that received the most comprehensive sex education reported their sex education to be more inclusive, preparative, and empowering but less comfortable. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2475549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While sex education has been linked to adolescent health, few studies have examined how comprehensiveness of school-based sex education may promote young adult sexual wellbeing. The current study used latent class analysis to examine patterns in the comprehensiveness of topics included in sex education among a national sample of young adults (N = 676). Many participants had not received sex education (40%) or had received sex education that was focused on abstinence (20%) or sexual risks (25%). Only 15% had received comprehensive sex education (likely to cover a range of topics, including condoms/contraception, sexual communication, gender, sexual orientation, pleasure, consent, etc.). Analyses examined how class membership related to sexual health. Compared to all other groups, young adults that had received the most comprehensive sex education were more likely to use condoms and communicate with their partners about STIs. They were also more likely to have had an STI test (compared to those who received other types of sex education) and reported greater sexual satisfaction (compared to those who received no sex education). Those that received the most comprehensive sex education reported their sex education to be more inclusive, preparative, and empowering but less comfortable. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虽然性教育与青少年的健康息息相关,但很少有研究探讨学校性教育的全面性如何促进青少年的性健康。本研究采用潜类分析法,对全国青少年样本(样本数=676)中性教育主题的全面性模式进行了研究。许多参与者没有接受过性教育(40%),或者接受的性教育侧重于禁欲(20%)或性风险(25%)。只有 15%的人接受过全面的性教育(可能涵盖一系列主题,包括避孕套/避孕、性交流、性别、性取向、快乐、同意等)。分析研究了阶级成员与性健康的关系。与所有其他群体相比,接受过最全面性教育的青壮年更有可能使用避孕套,也更有可能与伴侣就性传播感染进行沟通。他们也更有可能接受过性传播感染测试(与接受过其他类型性教育的人相比),并报告了更高的性满意度(与没有接受过性教育的人相比)。那些接受过最全面性教育的人表示,他们的性教育更具包容性、更有准备性、更有能力,但却不那么自在。本文讨论了研究和实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and Impact of School-Based Online Comprehensive Sexuality Education on Vocational High School Students: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Moving Toward a More Comprehensive Standard for Sex Education: A Latent Class Analysis and Examination of Young Adult Sexual Health. Appearance-Related Social Media Consciousness, Geosocial Networking App Use, and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Latinx Sexual Minority Men in the US: Acculturation as Moderator. Navigating Consent During Alcohol-Involved Sex: A Qualitative Study Examining Alcohol Consumption and the Sexual Consent Communication Process. Calling All Mares: Community, Identity, and Group Sex at the San Francisco Horse Market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1