Trends in Plan Offerings, Enrollment, and Premiums in Medicare Advantage and Medigap

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14456
Andrew M. Ryan, Anupama Warrier, Geronimo Bejarano, Christopher M. Whaley, David J. Meyers, Meehir N. Dixit
{"title":"Trends in Plan Offerings, Enrollment, and Premiums in Medicare Advantage and Medigap","authors":"Andrew M. Ryan,&nbsp;Anupama Warrier,&nbsp;Geronimo Bejarano,&nbsp;Christopher M. Whaley,&nbsp;David J. Meyers,&nbsp;Meehir N. Dixit","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Examine trends in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medigap plan offerings, enrollment, and premiums across state regulatory regimes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Setting and Design</h3>\n \n <p>We used national data between 2014 and 2021 on MA and Medigap plan offerings, enrollment, and premiums. Data on Medigap plan offerings and premiums were acquired from Weiss Ratings and matched with county-level data on the Medicare population from 2014 to 2021 Medicare Regional Variation and MA Landscape files. States were classified into three groups based on Medigap regulations: community rating and guaranteed issue states (Connecticut and New York); community rating-only states (Arkansas, Maine, Vermont, and Washington); and no additional Medigap regulation states (remaining states).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We considered only MA plans offering prescription drug coverage. Premiums for Traditional Medicare beneficiaries included Medigap and prescription drug premiums and were calculated using an inflation-adjusted Paasche price index to account for variation across plan types and market segments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Between 2014 and 2021, Medigap offerings and enrollment were relatively constant, while MA enrollment increased substantially. Medigap offerings were lower and MA offerings were higher in states with community rating and guaranteed issue. Between 2014 and 2021, Medigap premiums increased modestly from $4462 to $4745 in states with no additional Medigap regulations and from $6099 to $6612 in states with community rating and guaranteed issue. MA premiums (increased slightly from $2055 to $2121) in states with no additional Medigap regulations and were similar for other states.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite modest changes in recent years, Medigap premiums were substantially higher than those of MA. Medigap offerings and enrollment are lower, and premiums are higher, in states with guaranteed issue and community ratings. Nuanced reforms are needed to reduce supplemental insurance costs in Traditional Medicare while preventing adverse selection in Medigap markets.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Examine trends in Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medigap plan offerings, enrollment, and premiums across state regulatory regimes.

Study Setting and Design

We used national data between 2014 and 2021 on MA and Medigap plan offerings, enrollment, and premiums. Data on Medigap plan offerings and premiums were acquired from Weiss Ratings and matched with county-level data on the Medicare population from 2014 to 2021 Medicare Regional Variation and MA Landscape files. States were classified into three groups based on Medigap regulations: community rating and guaranteed issue states (Connecticut and New York); community rating-only states (Arkansas, Maine, Vermont, and Washington); and no additional Medigap regulation states (remaining states).

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

We considered only MA plans offering prescription drug coverage. Premiums for Traditional Medicare beneficiaries included Medigap and prescription drug premiums and were calculated using an inflation-adjusted Paasche price index to account for variation across plan types and market segments.

Principal Findings

Between 2014 and 2021, Medigap offerings and enrollment were relatively constant, while MA enrollment increased substantially. Medigap offerings were lower and MA offerings were higher in states with community rating and guaranteed issue. Between 2014 and 2021, Medigap premiums increased modestly from $4462 to $4745 in states with no additional Medigap regulations and from $6099 to $6612 in states with community rating and guaranteed issue. MA premiums (increased slightly from $2055 to $2121) in states with no additional Medigap regulations and were similar for other states.

Conclusions

Despite modest changes in recent years, Medigap premiums were substantially higher than those of MA. Medigap offerings and enrollment are lower, and premiums are higher, in states with guaranteed issue and community ratings. Nuanced reforms are needed to reduce supplemental insurance costs in Traditional Medicare while preventing adverse selection in Medigap markets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
趋势在计划提供,登记,和保费在医疗保险优势和医疗保险。
目的:检查医疗保险优势(MA)和医疗保险计划产品的趋势,注册,以及跨州监管制度的保费。研究设置和设计:我们使用2014年至2021年MA和Medigap计划提供、登记和保费的国家数据。Medigap计划产品和保费的数据来自Weiss Ratings,并与2014年至2021年医疗保险区域变化和MA景观文件的县级医疗保险人口数据相匹配。根据医疗保险计划的规定,各州被分为三组:社区评级和担保发行州(康涅狄格州和纽约州);仅限社区评级的州(阿肯色州、缅因州、佛蒙特州和华盛顿州);没有其他医疗保险监管州(剩余州)。数据收集/提取方法:我们只考虑提供处方药保险的MA计划。传统医疗保险受益人的保费包括Medigap和处方药保费,并使用通货膨胀调整后的Paasche价格指数计算,以考虑不同计划类型和细分市场的差异。主要发现:2014年至2021年间,Medigap的产品和入学人数相对稳定,而硕士入学人数大幅增加。在社区评级和担保发行的州,医疗保险产品较低,MA产品较高。2014年至2021年间,医疗保险计划的保费在没有额外医疗保险计划规定的州从4462美元小幅增加到4745美元,在有社区评级和担保发行的州从6099美元小幅增加到6612美元。在没有额外医疗保险规定的州,MA保费(从2055美元略微增加到2121美元)与其他州相似。结论:尽管近年来略有变化,但Medigap保费明显高于MA。在有保证问题和社区评级的州,医疗保险的产品和注册人数较低,保费较高。需要进行细致入微的改革,以降低传统医疗保险的补充保险成本,同时防止医疗保险市场的逆向选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Mind the Activation Gap: Factors Associated With Low Patient Activation Among Dual-Eligible Versus Medicare-Only Beneficiaries. Identifying Bariatric Surgery Patients With the Most Favorable Cost Outcomes. A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare. The All-Payer Claims Database After the Gobeille Supreme Court Decision: Assessing the Impact on Fatal Opioid-Related Overdose Research. Cost-Effectiveness of the Support and Services at Home (SASH) Program for Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Community-Based Approach to Healthy Aging in Place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1