Potential of the albumin-bilirubin score to predict the hepatic parenchymal contrast enhancement in the portal phase of abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography in patients with liver cirrhosis.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s12194-025-00895-1
Yasuhiro Inokuchi, Hiromasa Kurosaki
{"title":"Potential of the albumin-bilirubin score to predict the hepatic parenchymal contrast enhancement in the portal phase of abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography in patients with liver cirrhosis.","authors":"Yasuhiro Inokuchi, Hiromasa Kurosaki","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00895-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was recently used to predict hepatic reserve. This score is a continuous variable that is used to determine cutoff values and is easily calculated from albumin and bilirubin levels alone. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether the ALBI score could predict a decreased hepatic parenchymal contrast enhancement (HPCE) during the portal phase of dynamic multi-detector computed tomography in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). We retrospectively investigated Pearson's correlation between the HPCE and ALBI score in 26 patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. We classified the patients into those with HPCE < 50 HU or ≥ 50 HU and investigated whether the ALBI score differed significantly between these two groups. Furthermore, we used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the appropriate cutoff value of ALBI score for predicting LC patients with HPCE < 50 HU and ascertained the related area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The HPCE and ALBI score correlated significantly (r = -0.496, P = 0.0098). The ALBI score differed significantly between groups with HPCE < 50 HU and ≥ 50 HU (P = 0.0012). The cutoff value of the ALBI score for detecting LC patients with HPCE < 50 HU was -2.14, with an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.906, 83%, and 87%, respectively. In conclusion, the ALBI score is related to the HPCE during the portal phase in LC patients, and a cutoff value of ALBI score of -2.14 can predict the HPCE < 50 HU in LC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00895-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was recently used to predict hepatic reserve. This score is a continuous variable that is used to determine cutoff values and is easily calculated from albumin and bilirubin levels alone. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether the ALBI score could predict a decreased hepatic parenchymal contrast enhancement (HPCE) during the portal phase of dynamic multi-detector computed tomography in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). We retrospectively investigated Pearson's correlation between the HPCE and ALBI score in 26 patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. We classified the patients into those with HPCE < 50 HU or ≥ 50 HU and investigated whether the ALBI score differed significantly between these two groups. Furthermore, we used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to determine the appropriate cutoff value of ALBI score for predicting LC patients with HPCE < 50 HU and ascertained the related area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. The HPCE and ALBI score correlated significantly (r = -0.496, P = 0.0098). The ALBI score differed significantly between groups with HPCE < 50 HU and ≥ 50 HU (P = 0.0012). The cutoff value of the ALBI score for detecting LC patients with HPCE < 50 HU was -2.14, with an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.906, 83%, and 87%, respectively. In conclusion, the ALBI score is related to the HPCE during the portal phase in LC patients, and a cutoff value of ALBI score of -2.14 can predict the HPCE < 50 HU in LC patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
A multiple regression model for peak skin dose using principal component analysis in interventional radiology. A multi-institutional survey on technical variations in total body irradiation in Japan. Potential of the albumin-bilirubin score to predict the hepatic parenchymal contrast enhancement in the portal phase of abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography in patients with liver cirrhosis. Initial demonstration of the Scratch-PET concept: an intraoperative PET with a hand-held detector. Comparative analysis of radiotherapy modalities and techniques for left breast cancer: dose coverage, setup accuracy, with patient-specific selection criteria for applying deep inspiration breath hold.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1