Experience of physiotherapeutic care in pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: A qualitative study from a primary care perspective.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2025.2478494
Malin Eklund, Rita Sjöström
{"title":"Experience of physiotherapeutic care in pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: A qualitative study from a primary care perspective.","authors":"Malin Eklund, Rita Sjöström","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2478494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common cause of pain, there seem to be deficiencies in healthcare, regarding both knowledge and awareness of the condition. There is clearly a need for more research in the field of PPGP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to highlight how people affected by PPGP experience physiotherapeutic care in the primary care setting in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative interview study applied an inductive approach. The participants were selected through strategic sampling in primary healthcare units and via snowball sampling. Sixteen individual interviews were analyzed via qualitative content analysis according to Graneheim and Lundman.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified one overarching theme: Reflection on the participants' experiences cracks the façade, exposing a great need for healthcare. This theme is based on the participants' descriptions of initially feeling satisfied with the care they received for PPGP. However, when given the opportunity to reflect on their experiences, the participants clearly expressed wishes for improvements in physiotherapists' competence and interventions. The participants also emphasized a great desire to improve society's understanding of female-coded diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlight the participants' ambivalent experience of healthcare for PPGP. Paying attention to the diagnosis and taking it seriously should be emphasized. One way to improve healthcare for PPGP would be to improve physiotherapists' competence regarding PPGP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2478494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common cause of pain, there seem to be deficiencies in healthcare, regarding both knowledge and awareness of the condition. There is clearly a need for more research in the field of PPGP.

Objective: The aim was to highlight how people affected by PPGP experience physiotherapeutic care in the primary care setting in Sweden.

Methods: This qualitative interview study applied an inductive approach. The participants were selected through strategic sampling in primary healthcare units and via snowball sampling. Sixteen individual interviews were analyzed via qualitative content analysis according to Graneheim and Lundman.

Results: The analysis identified one overarching theme: Reflection on the participants' experiences cracks the façade, exposing a great need for healthcare. This theme is based on the participants' descriptions of initially feeling satisfied with the care they received for PPGP. However, when given the opportunity to reflect on their experiences, the participants clearly expressed wishes for improvements in physiotherapists' competence and interventions. The participants also emphasized a great desire to improve society's understanding of female-coded diagnoses.

Conclusions: The results highlight the participants' ambivalent experience of healthcare for PPGP. Paying attention to the diagnosis and taking it seriously should be emphasized. One way to improve healthcare for PPGP would be to improve physiotherapists' competence regarding PPGP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Burnout in occupational therapy and physiotherapy students: a systematic review of the risk and protective factors. Experience of physiotherapeutic care in pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: A qualitative study from a primary care perspective. Effectiveness of high-power laser therapy on partial tears of the supraspinatus tendon: A randomized controlled trial. Effects of immersive virtual reality-based action observation training integrated with focal muscle vibration on upper extremity in a patient with chronic disability following stroke: a single-subject study. Immediate Effects of Mobilization With Movement Technique on Cervical Muscle Stiffness, Pain, and Range of Motion in Individuals With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1