Differences in clinical features and risk factors for striae distensae in Black and White women

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Archives of Dermatological Research Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s00403-025-04050-z
Nada Elbuluk, Autumn L. Saizan, Arielle Carolina Mora Hurtado, Ted Hamilton, Sewon Kang
{"title":"Differences in clinical features and risk factors for striae distensae in Black and White women","authors":"Nada Elbuluk,&nbsp;Autumn L. Saizan,&nbsp;Arielle Carolina Mora Hurtado,&nbsp;Ted Hamilton,&nbsp;Sewon Kang","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04050-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Striae distensae (SD) are a common condition, which can appear differently across skin colors and for which effective treatments remain limited. SD have several risk factors, including pregnancy, obesity, growth spurts, and several pathologic conditions. Few studies have examined whether there are skin color differences regarding SD in their clinical presentation, risk factors, and associated comorbidities. To evaluate the clinical features, risk factors, and associated comorbidities of SD among Black and White women. This was a two-part study involving a telephone questionnaire followed by an in-person clinical assessment with standardized photographs. One hundred forty-three women (75 Black, 68 White) completed the survey, and 66 women (33 Black, 33 White) completed the in-person clinical assessment. Black and White women in the study were found to be similar in age, SD duration, parity, pregnancy-associated weight gain, and family history. Black women, on average, had a greater number of SD than White women (118 versus 76, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Striae were typically white and skin-colored among Black women, but white and violaceous among White women (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Black women were more likely to have involvement of the lower legs (<i>p</i> = 0.04), axilla (<i>p</i> = 0.05), and buttocks (<i>p</i> = 0.002) than White women. Compared to Black women, urinary incontinence was more commonly reported among White women, though this did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.07). There was a significant association between smoking and SD in White women (<i>p</i> = 0.003), but not in Black women. Additionally, Black women were more likely to use creams to diminish the appearance of their striae. While the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors of SD may be similar between Black and White women, there may be important skin color differences in SD clinical features and medical comorbidities. Larger studies are needed to further characterize the relationship between SD and medical comorbidities such as urinary incontinence and pelvic floor dysfunction. The study of this relationship may advance understanding of SD pathogenesis and provide pathways for targeted therapies. More studies are needed to determine the role of SD evaluation as a screening tool to help predict the risk of the development of pelvic floor dysfunction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-025-04050-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04050-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Striae distensae (SD) are a common condition, which can appear differently across skin colors and for which effective treatments remain limited. SD have several risk factors, including pregnancy, obesity, growth spurts, and several pathologic conditions. Few studies have examined whether there are skin color differences regarding SD in their clinical presentation, risk factors, and associated comorbidities. To evaluate the clinical features, risk factors, and associated comorbidities of SD among Black and White women. This was a two-part study involving a telephone questionnaire followed by an in-person clinical assessment with standardized photographs. One hundred forty-three women (75 Black, 68 White) completed the survey, and 66 women (33 Black, 33 White) completed the in-person clinical assessment. Black and White women in the study were found to be similar in age, SD duration, parity, pregnancy-associated weight gain, and family history. Black women, on average, had a greater number of SD than White women (118 versus 76, p = 0.01). Striae were typically white and skin-colored among Black women, but white and violaceous among White women (p = 0.02). Black women were more likely to have involvement of the lower legs (p = 0.04), axilla (p = 0.05), and buttocks (p = 0.002) than White women. Compared to Black women, urinary incontinence was more commonly reported among White women, though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). There was a significant association between smoking and SD in White women (p = 0.003), but not in Black women. Additionally, Black women were more likely to use creams to diminish the appearance of their striae. While the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors of SD may be similar between Black and White women, there may be important skin color differences in SD clinical features and medical comorbidities. Larger studies are needed to further characterize the relationship between SD and medical comorbidities such as urinary incontinence and pelvic floor dysfunction. The study of this relationship may advance understanding of SD pathogenesis and provide pathways for targeted therapies. More studies are needed to determine the role of SD evaluation as a screening tool to help predict the risk of the development of pelvic floor dysfunction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑人和白人妇女的临床特征和横纹扩张症风险因素的差异
扩张纹(SD)是一种常见的疾病,不同肤色的人会出现不同的症状,有效的治疗方法仍然有限。SD有几个危险因素,包括怀孕、肥胖、生长突增和一些病理条件。很少有研究调查SD在临床表现、危险因素和相关合并症方面是否存在肤色差异。评价黑人和白人女性SD的临床特征、危险因素及相关合并症。这是一项两部分的研究,包括电话问卷调查和标准化照片的亲自临床评估。143名女性(75名黑人,68名白人)完成了调查,66名女性(33名黑人,33名白人)完成了面对面的临床评估。研究发现,黑人和白人女性在年龄、SD持续时间、胎次、妊娠相关体重增加和家族史方面相似。黑人女性的平均SD数高于白人女性(118比76,p = 0.01)。黑人女性的条纹是典型的白色和皮肤颜色,而白人女性的条纹是白色和紫罗兰色(p = 0.02)。黑人女性比白人女性更容易累及小腿(p = 0.04)、腋窝(p = 0.05)和臀部(p = 0.002)。与黑人女性相比,白人女性尿失禁发生率更高,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.07)。吸烟与SD在白人女性中有显著关联(p = 0.003),但在黑人女性中无显著关联。此外,黑人女性更有可能使用面霜来消除她们的条纹。虽然黑人和白人女性SD的病因、患病率和危险因素可能相似,但SD的临床特征和医学合并症可能存在重要的肤色差异。需要更大规模的研究来进一步表征SD与尿失禁和盆底功能障碍等医学合并症之间的关系。对这一关系的研究可能会促进对SD发病机制的理解,并为靶向治疗提供途径。需要更多的研究来确定SD评估作为筛查工具的作用,以帮助预测骨盆底功能障碍的发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Photoprotective effects of deinoxanthin against UVA-Induced oxidative damage: an integrative computational and cellular analysis Geographic disparities and demographic influences in Mohs micrographic surgery: a county-level analysis of access and utilization in the U.S. Image enhancements by CLAHE and gamma correction do not improve diagnostic accuracy in teledermoscopy: a retrospective cohort study Reassessing Kaposi sarcoma subtypes: a case series of HIV-negative, immunocompetent young men From destruction to protection: rethinking MMP-1 in skin aging and anti-aging strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1