A multiple regression model for peak skin dose using principal component analysis in interventional radiology.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1007/s12194-025-00893-3
Noriyuki Kuga, Katsutoshi Shirieda, Yumi Hirabara, Yusuke Kurogi, Ryohei Fujisaki, Lue Sun, Koichi Morota, Takashi Moritake, Hajime Ohta
{"title":"A multiple regression model for peak skin dose using principal component analysis in interventional radiology.","authors":"Noriyuki Kuga, Katsutoshi Shirieda, Yumi Hirabara, Yusuke Kurogi, Ryohei Fujisaki, Lue Sun, Koichi Morota, Takashi Moritake, Hajime Ohta","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00893-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study addresses the growing concerns of increased radiation doses to patients resulting from the increased complexity of interventional radiology procedures. Despite the importance of dose management, few facilities use dosimetry systems to measure and control patient radiation doses. To aid in patient exposure control, this research aimed to predict the peak skin dose (PSD) using dose parameters from digital imaging and communication in medicine-radiation dose structured reports. The study focused on air kerma (K<sub>a,r</sub>) and air kerma area product (KAP) values categorized into fixed dose (radiography and fluoroscopy) and motion dose (rotational digital subtraction angiography) for frontal and lateral biplane devices. Using single and multiple regression analysis, model equations for PSD were developed based on data from a radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeter and five dose parameters. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to consolidate the data, and multiple regression models were created using principal component scores. The results showed that rotational digital subtraction angiography had a minimal impact on PSD, whereas the K<sub>a,r</sub> value demonstrated higher accuracy in predicting PSD than KAP. The inclusion of PCA in the multiple regression model further improved accuracy, with a root mean squared error of 226, confirming that PCA-enhanced models are more effective in predicting PSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00893-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the growing concerns of increased radiation doses to patients resulting from the increased complexity of interventional radiology procedures. Despite the importance of dose management, few facilities use dosimetry systems to measure and control patient radiation doses. To aid in patient exposure control, this research aimed to predict the peak skin dose (PSD) using dose parameters from digital imaging and communication in medicine-radiation dose structured reports. The study focused on air kerma (Ka,r) and air kerma area product (KAP) values categorized into fixed dose (radiography and fluoroscopy) and motion dose (rotational digital subtraction angiography) for frontal and lateral biplane devices. Using single and multiple regression analysis, model equations for PSD were developed based on data from a radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeter and five dose parameters. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to consolidate the data, and multiple regression models were created using principal component scores. The results showed that rotational digital subtraction angiography had a minimal impact on PSD, whereas the Ka,r value demonstrated higher accuracy in predicting PSD than KAP. The inclusion of PCA in the multiple regression model further improved accuracy, with a root mean squared error of 226, confirming that PCA-enhanced models are more effective in predicting PSD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
期刊最新文献
A multiple regression model for peak skin dose using principal component analysis in interventional radiology. A multi-institutional survey on technical variations in total body irradiation in Japan. Potential of the albumin-bilirubin score to predict the hepatic parenchymal contrast enhancement in the portal phase of abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography in patients with liver cirrhosis. Initial demonstration of the Scratch-PET concept: an intraoperative PET with a hand-held detector. Comparative analysis of radiotherapy modalities and techniques for left breast cancer: dose coverage, setup accuracy, with patient-specific selection criteria for applying deep inspiration breath hold.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1