A qualitative study to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians for genomic medicine in England - ready for take-off?

IF 1.5 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Community Genetics Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s12687-025-00781-8
Sophie Marlowe, Melissa Hill, Michelle Peter, Celine Lewis
{"title":"A qualitative study to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians for genomic medicine in England - ready for take-off?","authors":"Sophie Marlowe, Melissa Hill, Michelle Peter, Celine Lewis","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00781-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomic medicine (GM) was mainstreamed across the National Health Service (NHS) in England in 2018. Non-genetics healthcare professionals can now incorporate genomic testing including whole genome sequencing (WGS) into their clinical practice. This study was conducted to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians (CPs) for GM. Semi-structured interviews, using a topic guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, were conducted with 17 CPs working in the NHS to explore issues related to preparedness and confidence. Data were analysed using thematic template analysis. The codebook included both inductive and deductive codes informed by the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B), an implementation theory to explain behaviour change. The majority of participants perceived a net benefit from GM in terms of improving clinical management and information provision for patients and families and were receptive to using GM in their clinical practice. However, there was wide variation across trusts in CP preparedness for genomic medicine for reasons including lack of time and resources, notably workforce support. Many also lacked confidence in the skills required to deliver GM, and did not see GM as a priority. Most participants felt that they had access to GM education, but the main challenge was finding the time to engage with it. Strategies related to fiscal measures, enablement, training and education could help to address these early obstacles. Our findings may be relevant to clinicians in other non-genetic specialties integrating GM into their clinical practice not only in the UK NHS but more globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00781-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomic medicine (GM) was mainstreamed across the National Health Service (NHS) in England in 2018. Non-genetics healthcare professionals can now incorporate genomic testing including whole genome sequencing (WGS) into their clinical practice. This study was conducted to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians (CPs) for GM. Semi-structured interviews, using a topic guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, were conducted with 17 CPs working in the NHS to explore issues related to preparedness and confidence. Data were analysed using thematic template analysis. The codebook included both inductive and deductive codes informed by the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B), an implementation theory to explain behaviour change. The majority of participants perceived a net benefit from GM in terms of improving clinical management and information provision for patients and families and were receptive to using GM in their clinical practice. However, there was wide variation across trusts in CP preparedness for genomic medicine for reasons including lack of time and resources, notably workforce support. Many also lacked confidence in the skills required to deliver GM, and did not see GM as a priority. Most participants felt that they had access to GM education, but the main challenge was finding the time to engage with it. Strategies related to fiscal measures, enablement, training and education could help to address these early obstacles. Our findings may be relevant to clinicians in other non-genetic specialties integrating GM into their clinical practice not only in the UK NHS but more globally.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项定性研究,评估英格兰社区儿科医生对基因组医学的准备情况--准备好起飞了吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
期刊最新文献
Developing a questionnaire to explore lay people's preferences for communicating hereditary conditions within families: insights from a cognitive interview study. "Hope at a better chance": perspectives on genetic counseling and testing among black individuals with prostate cancer. Preconception carrier screening in 2025: what's next? : A collection in the journal of community genetics. A qualitative study to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians for genomic medicine in England - ready for take-off? Trusted partners, community priorities, and data protections: requirements for precision medicine research with Alaska Native peoples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1