Long-term exposure to low-level crystalline silica and risk assessment of silicosis: a cohort study.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Thorax Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222660
Dongming Wang, Wenzhen Li, Min Zhou, Jixuan Ma, Yanjun Guo, Weihong Chen
{"title":"Long-term exposure to low-level crystalline silica and risk assessment of silicosis: a cohort study.","authors":"Dongming Wang, Wenzhen Li, Min Zhou, Jixuan Ma, Yanjun Guo, Weihong Chen","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-level exposure to crystalline silica dust is the key factor in silicosis. Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust, for example, lower than that in occupational exposure limits, still needs to be studied for their risk of silicosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 697 workers were included from a cohort in China. Low-level silica dust exposure was defined as those having a lifetime mean silica dust concentration equal to or under permissible exposure limits, including 0.05 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, 0.10 mg/m<sup>3</sup> and 0.35 mg/m<sup>3</sup>. Cumulative respirable silica dust exposure (CDE) for individual workers was assessed by linking a job-exposure matrix to personal work history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those with average exposure level equal to or lower than 0.05 mg/m<sup>3</sup>, compared with the lowest quartile CDE (Q1), the HRs of silicosis were 1.32 (95% CI 0.82 to 2.10) for Q2, 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.88) for Q3 and 2.00 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.09) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.10 mg/m<sup>3</sup> or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.52 (95% CI 1.88 to 3.38) for Q2, 4.08 (95% CI 3.09 to 5.39) for Q3 and 4.02 (95% CI 3.04 to 5.32) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.35 mg/m<sup>3</sup> or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.80 (95% CI 2.38 to 3.28) for Q2, 5.76 (95% CI 4.93 to 6.73) for Q3 and 7.14 (95% CI 6.07 to 8.40) for Q4, respectively. Stratified analysis showed that the results and trends did not change with facilities and smoking status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust is still associated with a higher risk of silicosis. Control measurements and personal protective equipment should be emphasised to protect the health of workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-level exposure to crystalline silica dust is the key factor in silicosis. Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust, for example, lower than that in occupational exposure limits, still needs to be studied for their risk of silicosis.

Methods: A total of 30 697 workers were included from a cohort in China. Low-level silica dust exposure was defined as those having a lifetime mean silica dust concentration equal to or under permissible exposure limits, including 0.05 mg/m3, 0.10 mg/m3 and 0.35 mg/m3. Cumulative respirable silica dust exposure (CDE) for individual workers was assessed by linking a job-exposure matrix to personal work history.

Results: Among those with average exposure level equal to or lower than 0.05 mg/m3, compared with the lowest quartile CDE (Q1), the HRs of silicosis were 1.32 (95% CI 0.82 to 2.10) for Q2, 1.87 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.88) for Q3 and 2.00 (95% CI 1.30 to 3.09) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.10 mg/m3 or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.52 (95% CI 1.88 to 3.38) for Q2, 4.08 (95% CI 3.09 to 5.39) for Q3 and 4.02 (95% CI 3.04 to 5.32) for Q4. Among those exposed to 0.35 mg/m3 or less exposure level, compared with Q1, the HRs were 2.80 (95% CI 2.38 to 3.28) for Q2, 5.76 (95% CI 4.93 to 6.73) for Q3 and 7.14 (95% CI 6.07 to 8.40) for Q4, respectively. Stratified analysis showed that the results and trends did not change with facilities and smoking status.

Conclusion: Long-term exposure to low-level silica dust is still associated with a higher risk of silicosis. Control measurements and personal protective equipment should be emphasised to protect the health of workers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Effects of long-term oxygen therapy on acute exacerbation and hospital burden: the national DISCOVERY study Role of inflammasomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Availability, cost and affordability of essential medicines for smoking cessation in low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study. Pulmonary rehabilitation: one size does not fit all. Incidental finding of leukaemic pulmonary infiltration confirmed by flow cytometry of BAL fluid.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1