Rapid evaluation of the NHS Recovery Support Programme (RSP) in England: Implementing intensive national improvement support for challenged healthcare providers and systems
Maartje Kletter, Stephanie Gillibrand, Elaine Harkness, Jo Dumville, Paul Wilson
{"title":"Rapid evaluation of the NHS Recovery Support Programme (RSP) in England: Implementing intensive national improvement support for challenged healthcare providers and systems","authors":"Maartje Kletter, Stephanie Gillibrand, Elaine Harkness, Jo Dumville, Paul Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Launched in 2021, the Recovery Support Programme (RSP) provides mandated intensive improvement support to NHS healthcare providers and systems in England experiencing significant financial, quality or safety failings. The aim is to prevent further deterioration, embed improvement and to enable sustained stabilisation. We conducted a rapid multi-method study to evaluate the early implementation of the RSP to understand initial impact and identify further developments which could improve its delivery. We found that whilst the RSP is generally perceived as more supportive and less punitive than the special measures regime it replaced, there are areas where its delivery could be enhanced. There is variation in how the programme is delivered across regions and several core processes could be standardised to enable more structured assessment of system capability and development of capacity to support change. The presence of cross system collective leadership and external facilitation may be the core-enabling features necessary to embed improvement and enable sustained stabilisation in NHS organisations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 105300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Launched in 2021, the Recovery Support Programme (RSP) provides mandated intensive improvement support to NHS healthcare providers and systems in England experiencing significant financial, quality or safety failings. The aim is to prevent further deterioration, embed improvement and to enable sustained stabilisation. We conducted a rapid multi-method study to evaluate the early implementation of the RSP to understand initial impact and identify further developments which could improve its delivery. We found that whilst the RSP is generally perceived as more supportive and less punitive than the special measures regime it replaced, there are areas where its delivery could be enhanced. There is variation in how the programme is delivered across regions and several core processes could be standardised to enable more structured assessment of system capability and development of capacity to support change. The presence of cross system collective leadership and external facilitation may be the core-enabling features necessary to embed improvement and enable sustained stabilisation in NHS organisations.
期刊介绍：
Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
