Public participation GIS scenarios for decision-making on land-use requirements for renewable energy systems

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy, Sustainability and Society Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s13705-025-00518-y
Christine Rösch, Elham Fakharizadehshirazi
{"title":"Public participation GIS scenarios for decision-making on land-use requirements for renewable energy systems","authors":"Christine Rösch,&nbsp;Elham Fakharizadehshirazi","doi":"10.1186/s13705-025-00518-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The transition to renewable energy is crucial for decarbonising the energy system but creates land-use competition. Whilst there is consensus on the need for local responsibility in achieving climate neutrality, debates continue over where to implement renewable energy plants. The Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) scenario approach can facilitate these debates and improve equity and procedural and distributive justice.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings highlight the effectiveness of the PPGIS method in assessing the spatial impact of technologies on agriculture and landscapes. The approach was tested in a rural German municipality to help stakeholders and citizens recognise the potential for land-based solar energy even under strict constraints. These insights were shared to support decision-makers on land-use changes to increase renewable energy production.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings indicate that the PPGIS scenario approach is valuable for improving equity and mutual understanding in local decision-making processes. Incorporating stakeholders’ and citizens’ perspectives into renewable energy planning enhances the transparency, legitimacy, and acceptability of land-use decisions. The ability to visualise and quantitatively assess different scenarios makes PPGIS particularly useful for addressing the complexities of public debates on land-use requirements for renewable energy systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":539,"journal":{"name":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13705-025-00518-y","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-025-00518-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The transition to renewable energy is crucial for decarbonising the energy system but creates land-use competition. Whilst there is consensus on the need for local responsibility in achieving climate neutrality, debates continue over where to implement renewable energy plants. The Public Participation Geographic Information System (PPGIS) scenario approach can facilitate these debates and improve equity and procedural and distributive justice.

Results

The findings highlight the effectiveness of the PPGIS method in assessing the spatial impact of technologies on agriculture and landscapes. The approach was tested in a rural German municipality to help stakeholders and citizens recognise the potential for land-based solar energy even under strict constraints. These insights were shared to support decision-makers on land-use changes to increase renewable energy production.

Conclusions

The findings indicate that the PPGIS scenario approach is valuable for improving equity and mutual understanding in local decision-making processes. Incorporating stakeholders’ and citizens’ perspectives into renewable energy planning enhances the transparency, legitimacy, and acceptability of land-use decisions. The ability to visualise and quantitatively assess different scenarios makes PPGIS particularly useful for addressing the complexities of public debates on land-use requirements for renewable energy systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景向可再生能源的过渡对于能源系统的去碳化至关重要,但同时也造成了土地使用的竞争。尽管人们一致认为地方有必要为实现气候中和承担责任,但关于在哪里建设可再生能源发电厂的争论仍在继续。公众参与地理信息系统(PPGIS)方案方法可以促进这些争论,并提高公平性、程序公正性和分配公正性。结果研究结果凸显了公众参与地理信息系统方法在评估技术对农业和景观的空间影响方面的有效性。该方法在德国一个农村城市进行了测试,帮助利益相关者和市民认识到陆基太阳能的潜力,即使是在严格的限制条件下。结论研究结果表明,PPGIS 情景方法对于提高地方决策过程中的公平性和相互理解很有价值。将利益相关者和公民的观点纳入可再生能源规划可提高土地使用决策的透明度、合法性和可接受性。可视化和定量评估不同情景的能力使 PPGIS 特别适用于解决有关可再生能源系统土地使用要求的公共辩论的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Energy, Sustainability and Society Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy, Sustainability and Society is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. It covers topics ranging from scientific research to innovative approaches for technology implementation to analysis of economic, social and environmental impacts of sustainable energy systems.
期刊最新文献
Public participation GIS scenarios for decision-making on land-use requirements for renewable energy systems Advanced computing to support urban climate neutrality Approaching social acceptance of energy technologies: ten European papers showcasing statistical analyses–a targeted review Opening up and closing down citizen participation in the development of a sustainable neighborhood energy system Tradable performance standards for a greener transportation sector: an economists’ appraisal of the German greenhouse gas mitigation quota
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1