Use of Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Circulatory Death Donors for Lung Transplantation in the United States

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70135
Jonathan E. Williams, John M. Trahanas, Jacob A. Klapper, Caitlin Demarest, Kiran H. Lagisetty, Andrew C. Chang, Dennis M. Lyu, David D. Odell, Matthew D. Bacchetta, Aaron M. Williams
{"title":"Use of Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Circulatory Death Donors for Lung Transplantation in the United States","authors":"Jonathan E. Williams,&nbsp;John M. Trahanas,&nbsp;Jacob A. Klapper,&nbsp;Caitlin Demarest,&nbsp;Kiran H. Lagisetty,&nbsp;Andrew C. Chang,&nbsp;Dennis M. Lyu,&nbsp;David D. Odell,&nbsp;Matthew D. Bacchetta,&nbsp;Aaron M. Williams","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) to recover donation after circulatory death (DCD) organs demonstrates increased heart utilization with favorable outcomes. Conversely, DCD lung allograft use when NRP was employed remains controversial. This is a contemporary analysis of DCD lung recipient outcomes in which NRP was used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Utilizing the STAR-OPTN database, all adult DCD lung recipients in the United States between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2024 were identified. NRP use was defined if the time between donor death and aortic clamp time was greater than 30 min. Recipient outcomes, including 30-, 60-, and 90-day mortality, grade-3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and postoperative length of stay were compared using multivariable logistic regression controlling for donor and recipient covariates. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard modeling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 987 DCD lung transplants, 92 (9.4%) utilized NRP. There were no differences in recipient characteristics between direct recovery and NRP cohorts. No difference in 30-, 60-, or 90-day mortality, grade-3 PGD, or length of stay was found between cohorts. 12-month survival was equivalent.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Outcomes between NRP lung recipients were equivalent to DCD direct recovery recipients. Thus, donor lungs may be considered for transplantation following NRP donation procedures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) to recover donation after circulatory death (DCD) organs demonstrates increased heart utilization with favorable outcomes. Conversely, DCD lung allograft use when NRP was employed remains controversial. This is a contemporary analysis of DCD lung recipient outcomes in which NRP was used.

Methods

Utilizing the STAR-OPTN database, all adult DCD lung recipients in the United States between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2024 were identified. NRP use was defined if the time between donor death and aortic clamp time was greater than 30 min. Recipient outcomes, including 30-, 60-, and 90-day mortality, grade-3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and postoperative length of stay were compared using multivariable logistic regression controlling for donor and recipient covariates. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard modeling.

Results

Of 987 DCD lung transplants, 92 (9.4%) utilized NRP. There were no differences in recipient characteristics between direct recovery and NRP cohorts. No difference in 30-, 60-, or 90-day mortality, grade-3 PGD, or length of stay was found between cohorts. 12-month survival was equivalent.

Conclusions

Outcomes between NRP lung recipients were equivalent to DCD direct recovery recipients. Thus, donor lungs may be considered for transplantation following NRP donation procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Donor App Increases Awareness and Overall Living Kidney Organ Donation Use of Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Circulatory Death Donors for Lung Transplantation in the United States Innovative Trajectory Analysis Reveals Dynamics and Risk Factors of Post-Kidney Transplant Diabetes Mellitus in a French Cohort Normothermic Machine Perfusion Improves Outcomes for Donation After Cardiac Death Allografts With Extended Donor Warm Ischemia Time Type A Aortic Dissection Following Abdominal Solid Organ Transplantation: Population-Level Outcomes in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1