Intraoperative robotic measurements of coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty correlate with pre- and post-operative long-leg radiographs

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70220
Anoop S. Chandrashekar, Jacob A. Fox, Logan M. Locascio, Gregory G. Polkowski, Martin Faschingbauer, J. Ryan Martin
{"title":"Intraoperative robotic measurements of coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty correlate with pre- and post-operative long-leg radiographs","authors":"Anoop S. Chandrashekar,&nbsp;Jacob A. Fox,&nbsp;Logan M. Locascio,&nbsp;Gregory G. Polkowski,&nbsp;Martin Faschingbauer,&nbsp;J. Ryan Martin","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study sought to validate intraoperative robotic measurements of femoral and tibial component coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing to pre- and post-operative standing, double stance, long-leg radiographs (LLR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study included 59 unique patients undergoing primary TKA at a single institution. Pre- and post-operative femoral and tibial coronal alignment were measured on LLRs using a deep learning artificial intelligence model and compared to measurements obtained from the imageless robotic system to evaluate the robot's accuracy and reliability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Robotic measurements were highly correlated with measurements from preoperative LLR (Pearson <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.68). There was no significant difference in preoperative constitutional alignment between the two methodologies (p = 0.28). Additionally, the intraoperative and post-operative alignment of femoral and tibial implants were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.12 and <i>p</i> = 0.95, respectively) and were strongly correlated (Pearson <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.5 and Pearson <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.6 respectively). The mean difference in femoral alignment was 0.43° and the mean difference in tibial alignment was 0.01°.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of this study suggest that there were no significant differences in the coronal alignment of TKA when assessed by a robotic system compared to LLR. This signifies the robotic system's high intraoperative accuracy and reliability in determining coronal alignment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level III.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study sought to validate intraoperative robotic measurements of femoral and tibial component coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing to pre- and post-operative standing, double stance, long-leg radiographs (LLR).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 59 unique patients undergoing primary TKA at a single institution. Pre- and post-operative femoral and tibial coronal alignment were measured on LLRs using a deep learning artificial intelligence model and compared to measurements obtained from the imageless robotic system to evaluate the robot's accuracy and reliability.

Results

Robotic measurements were highly correlated with measurements from preoperative LLR (Pearson r2 = 0.68). There was no significant difference in preoperative constitutional alignment between the two methodologies (p = 0.28). Additionally, the intraoperative and post-operative alignment of femoral and tibial implants were not significantly different (p = 0.12 and p = 0.95, respectively) and were strongly correlated (Pearson r2 = 0.5 and Pearson r2 = 0.6 respectively). The mean difference in femoral alignment was 0.43° and the mean difference in tibial alignment was 0.01°.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that there were no significant differences in the coronal alignment of TKA when assessed by a robotic system compared to LLR. This signifies the robotic system's high intraoperative accuracy and reliability in determining coronal alignment.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative robotic measurements of coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty correlate with pre- and post-operative long-leg radiographs Comparison of low molecular weight heparin, aspirin, and their combination for the prevention of thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty in obese patients Surgeons consider Rockwood classification the most important factor for decision-making in acute, high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations Measures of knee internal and external rotation made with a digital inclinometer are consistent with the measures made with an electromagnetic tracking system Lateral extra-articular procedures combined with ACL reconstructions lead to a higher return to pre-injury level of sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1