An Eyebrow Design for Chinese Men Before Eyebrow Transplantation.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-04781-4
Hang Li, Jinqing Li, Shuao Xiao, Yong Pan
{"title":"An Eyebrow Design for Chinese Men Before Eyebrow Transplantation.","authors":"Hang Li, Jinqing Li, Shuao Xiao, Yong Pan","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04781-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, there is no standardized preoperative eyebrow design method specifically for eyebrow transplantation surgery in clinical practice. This paper introduces a model tailored for the Chinese male population, the \"five-point method\" which is based on existing eyebrow design techniques and aims to provide a basis for eyebrow shape design in eyebrow transplantation surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study spanning two years (June 2020-May 2022), 21 patients who underwent the \"five-point method\" were included. Blind observers used the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) to assess these patients and 33 others who had previously undergone conventional eyebrow transplantation. Additionally, patients self-evaluated using the FACE-Q scale preoperatively and six months postoperatively, analyzing changes in appearance, psychological, and social functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GAIS results indicated that 95.24% of patients treated with the \"five-point method\" were rated as \"greatly improved,\" \"much improved,\" or \"improved,\" significantly outperforming the 84.85% in conventional eyebrow transplantation. FACE-Q self-assessment results showed that, compared to preoperative conditions, most patients experienced improvements in appearance, aging, psychological, and social functioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"five-point method\" is a standardized, effective preoperative eyebrow design method, superior to conventional surgery in terms of improvement. Additionally, patients who underwent the \"five-point method\" reported higher levels of self-satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04781-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no standardized preoperative eyebrow design method specifically for eyebrow transplantation surgery in clinical practice. This paper introduces a model tailored for the Chinese male population, the "five-point method" which is based on existing eyebrow design techniques and aims to provide a basis for eyebrow shape design in eyebrow transplantation surgery.

Methods: In a prospective study spanning two years (June 2020-May 2022), 21 patients who underwent the "five-point method" were included. Blind observers used the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) to assess these patients and 33 others who had previously undergone conventional eyebrow transplantation. Additionally, patients self-evaluated using the FACE-Q scale preoperatively and six months postoperatively, analyzing changes in appearance, psychological, and social functioning.

Results: The GAIS results indicated that 95.24% of patients treated with the "five-point method" were rated as "greatly improved," "much improved," or "improved," significantly outperforming the 84.85% in conventional eyebrow transplantation. FACE-Q self-assessment results showed that, compared to preoperative conditions, most patients experienced improvements in appearance, aging, psychological, and social functioning.

Conclusion: The "five-point method" is a standardized, effective preoperative eyebrow design method, superior to conventional surgery in terms of improvement. Additionally, patients who underwent the "five-point method" reported higher levels of self-satisfaction.

Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Tranexamic Acid for Postoperative Outcomes in Breast Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. An Eyebrow Design for Chinese Men Before Eyebrow Transplantation. Beyond the Brazilian Butt Lift: How to Objectively Measure Outcome. Correction: Assessing the Informational Value of Large Language Models Responses in Aesthetic Surgery: A Comparative Analysis with Expert Opinions. Social Media and Plastic Surgery, the Good, the Bad, and Where are We Going?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1