An Eyebrow Design for Chinese Men Before Eyebrow Transplantation

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-04781-4
Hang Li, Jinqing Li, Shuao Xiao, Yong Pan
{"title":"An Eyebrow Design for Chinese Men Before Eyebrow Transplantation","authors":"Hang Li,&nbsp;Jinqing Li,&nbsp;Shuao Xiao,&nbsp;Yong Pan","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04781-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Currently, there is no standardized preoperative eyebrow design method specifically for eyebrow transplantation surgery in clinical practice. This paper introduces a model tailored for the Chinese male population, the “five-point method” which is based on existing eyebrow design techniques and aims to provide a basis for eyebrow shape design in eyebrow transplantation surgery.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a prospective study spanning two years (June 2020–May 2022), 21 patients who underwent the \"five-point method\" were included. Blind observers used the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) to assess these patients and 33 others who had previously undergone conventional eyebrow transplantation. Additionally, patients self-evaluated using the FACE-Q scale preoperatively and six months postoperatively, analyzing changes in appearance, psychological, and social functioning.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The GAIS results indicated that 95.24% of patients treated with the “five-point method” were rated as “greatly improved,” “much improved,” or “improved,” significantly outperforming the 84.85% in conventional eyebrow transplantation. FACE-Q self-assessment results showed that, compared to preoperative conditions, most patients experienced improvements in appearance, aging, psychological, and social functioning.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The “five-point method” is a standardized, effective preoperative eyebrow design method, superior to conventional surgery in terms of improvement. Additionally, patients who underwent the “five-point method” reported higher levels of self-satisfaction.</p><h3>Level of Evidence III</h3><p>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":"49 9","pages":"2607 - 2613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04781-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Currently, there is no standardized preoperative eyebrow design method specifically for eyebrow transplantation surgery in clinical practice. This paper introduces a model tailored for the Chinese male population, the “five-point method” which is based on existing eyebrow design techniques and aims to provide a basis for eyebrow shape design in eyebrow transplantation surgery.

Methods

In a prospective study spanning two years (June 2020–May 2022), 21 patients who underwent the "five-point method" were included. Blind observers used the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) to assess these patients and 33 others who had previously undergone conventional eyebrow transplantation. Additionally, patients self-evaluated using the FACE-Q scale preoperatively and six months postoperatively, analyzing changes in appearance, psychological, and social functioning.

Results

The GAIS results indicated that 95.24% of patients treated with the “five-point method” were rated as “greatly improved,” “much improved,” or “improved,” significantly outperforming the 84.85% in conventional eyebrow transplantation. FACE-Q self-assessment results showed that, compared to preoperative conditions, most patients experienced improvements in appearance, aging, psychological, and social functioning.

Conclusion

The “five-point method” is a standardized, effective preoperative eyebrow design method, superior to conventional surgery in terms of improvement. Additionally, patients who underwent the “five-point method” reported higher levels of self-satisfaction.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国男性在眉毛移植前的眉毛设计。
背景:目前临床上尚无专门针对眉移植手术的标准化术前眉毛设计方法。本文介绍了一种为中国男性量身打造的模型——“五点法”,该模型是基于现有的眉形设计技术,旨在为眉移植手术中眉形设计提供依据。方法:在一项为期两年(2020年6月- 2022年5月)的前瞻性研究中,纳入了21例接受“五点法”治疗的患者。盲观察人员使用全球审美改善量表(GAIS)来评估这些患者和其他33名以前接受过传统眉毛移植的患者。此外,患者术前和术后6个月使用FACE-Q量表进行自我评估,分析外观、心理和社会功能的变化。结果:GAIS结果显示,95.24%的患者对“五分法”的评价为“大大改善”、“改善”、“改善”,明显优于常规眉移植的84.85%。FACE-Q自我评估结果显示,与术前相比,大多数患者在外观、衰老、心理和社会功能方面都有所改善。结论:“五点法”是一种规范、有效的术前眉形设计方法,在改善方面优于常规手术。此外,接受“五点方法”的患者报告了更高水平的自我满意度。证据等级iii:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
期刊最新文献
Response to Commentary on "Rhinoplasty and the 'Big Five' Model: The Impact of Patients' Personality Traits on Post-surgical Satisfaction Outcomes". Motivations, Concerns, and the Role of Social Media in Upper Blepharoplasty Candidates: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Mapping the Mandibular Lingual Foramina for Safer Chin Surgery: CT Morphometry and Predictive Modeling. Comment on: "Effects of Profhilo Tissue Bioremodeling on Skin Texture and Perioral Wrinkles: A Randomized Controlled Triple-Blind Clinical Trial". Letter in Reply to Comment on: "Pocket Conversion from Prepectoral to Retropectoral Implant Placement in Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-effective Solution for High-Grade Rippling and Implant Visibility".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1