Conventional versus AI-based spectral data processing and classification approaches to enhance LIBS's analytical performance†

IF 2.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Methods Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1039/D5AY00027K
Zakaria E. Ahmed, Rania M. Abdelazeem, Mahmoud Abdelhamid, Zienab Abdel-Salam and Mohamed Abdel-Harith
{"title":"Conventional versus AI-based spectral data processing and classification approaches to enhance LIBS's analytical performance†","authors":"Zakaria E. Ahmed, Rania M. Abdelazeem, Mahmoud Abdelhamid, Zienab Abdel-Salam and Mohamed Abdel-Harith","doi":"10.1039/D5AY00027K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) combined with Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a powerful method for analyzing and comparing spectral data. This study presents a comparative analysis of conventional and AI-developed methods for processing and interpreting LIBS data, especially in forensic applications, focusing on toner sample discrimination. We propose a novel AI-developed approach that combines normalization, interpolation, and peak detection techniques to simplify LIBS spectral analysis without user preprocessing and easily identify unique spectral features. This method was compared with conventional principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), which are commonly used for LIBS data analysis. The AI-developed method demonstrated superior performance in discriminating between toner samples from various brands and models of printers and photocopiers. The quantitative evaluation of the performance of the AI-developed approach was performed using statistical analysis, including accuracy difference percentage, component-wise variance analysis, paired <em>t</em>-test, and cross-validation test. The results confirmed a significant improvement in accuracy with the AI-developed method compared to conventional approaches. This proposed work highlights the potential of AI in enhancing spectroscopic analysis for forensic applications, offering increased efficiency and accuracy in sample discrimination and classification. Additionally, it accelerates the analysis of LIBS data with no need for user preprocessing.</p>","PeriodicalId":64,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Methods","volume":" 13","pages":" 2771-2782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ay/d5ay00027k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) combined with Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a powerful method for analyzing and comparing spectral data. This study presents a comparative analysis of conventional and AI-developed methods for processing and interpreting LIBS data, especially in forensic applications, focusing on toner sample discrimination. We propose a novel AI-developed approach that combines normalization, interpolation, and peak detection techniques to simplify LIBS spectral analysis without user preprocessing and easily identify unique spectral features. This method was compared with conventional principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), which are commonly used for LIBS data analysis. The AI-developed method demonstrated superior performance in discriminating between toner samples from various brands and models of printers and photocopiers. The quantitative evaluation of the performance of the AI-developed approach was performed using statistical analysis, including accuracy difference percentage, component-wise variance analysis, paired t-test, and cross-validation test. The results confirmed a significant improvement in accuracy with the AI-developed method compared to conventional approaches. This proposed work highlights the potential of AI in enhancing spectroscopic analysis for forensic applications, offering increased efficiency and accuracy in sample discrimination and classification. Additionally, it accelerates the analysis of LIBS data with no need for user preprocessing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传统的与基于人工智能的光谱数据处理和分类方法提高LIBS的分析性能。
激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)与人工智能(AI)相结合,为分析和比较光谱数据提供了一种强大的方法。本研究对处理和解释LIBS数据的传统方法和人工智能开发的方法进行了比较分析,特别是在法医应用中,重点是色粉样本的区分。我们提出了一种新的人工智能开发的方法,该方法结合了归一化、插值和峰值检测技术,可以简化LIBS光谱分析,无需用户预处理,并轻松识别独特的光谱特征。将该方法与LIBS数据分析常用的主成分分析(PCA)和偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)进行了比较。人工智能开发的方法在区分不同品牌和型号的打印机和复印机的碳粉样品方面表现出优异的性能。采用统计分析对人工智能开发方法的性能进行定量评估,包括准确性差异百分比、成分方差分析、配对t检验和交叉验证检验。结果证实,与传统方法相比,人工智能开发的方法在准确性方面有显着提高。这项拟议的工作强调了人工智能在增强法医应用的光谱分析方面的潜力,提高了样品鉴别和分类的效率和准确性。此外,它加速了LIBS数据的分析,无需用户预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Methods
Analytical Methods CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
569
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Early applied demonstrations of new analytical methods with clear societal impact
期刊最新文献
Ecologically benign S-doped g-C3N4 nano-architectonics for rapid and selective fluorescent detection of the jaundice biomarker bilirubin. Precision traceability of trace psychoactive substances under water quality parameter perturbations in a complex matrix situation. SERS-assisted multivariate data analysis of the spectinomycin-Cu(II) complex released in blood serum from a stimuli-responsive drug carrier: in vitro kinetics modeling and pharmacodynamic analysis. Spectrophotometric determination of the degree of acetylation of cellulose acetate via ferric hydroxamate complexation: method development and validation. Optimised untargeted metabolomics workflow for human urinary extracellular vesicles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1