Advancing freshwater conservation: techno-economic study of conventional and closed-circuit reverse osmosis systems in full-scale units with challenging feed water conditions

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science and Pollution Research Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s11356-025-36221-w
Shahram Niazi, Mohsen Karegar Ghavibazoo Jalali
{"title":"Advancing freshwater conservation: techno-economic study of conventional and closed-circuit reverse osmosis systems in full-scale units with challenging feed water conditions","authors":"Shahram Niazi,&nbsp;Mohsen Karegar Ghavibazoo Jalali","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36221-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This techno-economic study evaluated two approaches for conserving freshwater in full-scale brackish RO units, i.e., conventional secondary RO and closed-circuit RO (CCRO) systems. Three industrial cases with silica-rich, sulfate-rich, and high-salinity waters were analyzed through numerical modeling. Results demonstrated that both secondary RO and CCRO effectively conserved freshwater, with CCRO achieving 5–8% higher recovery rates and being less prone to scaling. However, CCRO recovery was limited by silica and sulfate salts supersaturation and constrained by the maximum operating pressure (41.3 bar) for high-salinity water. CCRO systems required fewer membrane elements, eliminated acid use, and consumed less energy but demanded more pressure vessels, higher antiscalant use, and produced slightly lower permeate quality. Statistical analysis revealed critical operational thresholds for both systems: 83% recovery for multi-stage RO and 89% for CCRO, beyond which performance declines significantly, especially at higher feed salinities. Economically, multi-stage RO consistently exhibited lower capital and total production costs across all case studies, while CCRO’s advantages in recovery and energy efficiency were offset by higher capital and chemical expenses. Nevertheless, CCRO remains a potentially competitive option in moderate-salinity conditions if antiscalant consumption is optimized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 14","pages":"8893 - 8920"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36221-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This techno-economic study evaluated two approaches for conserving freshwater in full-scale brackish RO units, i.e., conventional secondary RO and closed-circuit RO (CCRO) systems. Three industrial cases with silica-rich, sulfate-rich, and high-salinity waters were analyzed through numerical modeling. Results demonstrated that both secondary RO and CCRO effectively conserved freshwater, with CCRO achieving 5–8% higher recovery rates and being less prone to scaling. However, CCRO recovery was limited by silica and sulfate salts supersaturation and constrained by the maximum operating pressure (41.3 bar) for high-salinity water. CCRO systems required fewer membrane elements, eliminated acid use, and consumed less energy but demanded more pressure vessels, higher antiscalant use, and produced slightly lower permeate quality. Statistical analysis revealed critical operational thresholds for both systems: 83% recovery for multi-stage RO and 89% for CCRO, beyond which performance declines significantly, especially at higher feed salinities. Economically, multi-stage RO consistently exhibited lower capital and total production costs across all case studies, while CCRO’s advantages in recovery and energy efficiency were offset by higher capital and chemical expenses. Nevertheless, CCRO remains a potentially competitive option in moderate-salinity conditions if antiscalant consumption is optimized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进淡水保护:常规和闭路反渗透系统在具有挑战性的给水条件的全尺寸装置中的技术经济研究。
这项技术经济研究评估了在全尺寸微咸反渗透装置中节约淡水的两种方法,即传统的二次反渗透和闭路反渗透(CCRO)系统。通过数值模拟分析了富硅、富硫酸盐和高盐度水体的3个工业案例。结果表明,二级反渗透和CCRO均能有效保护淡水资源,CCRO的回收率提高5-8%,且不易结垢。然而,CCRO的采收率受到二氧化硅和硫酸盐过饱和的限制,并受到高盐度水的最大操作压力(41.3 bar)的限制。CCRO系统需要更少的膜元件,避免了酸的使用,消耗更少的能量,但需要更多的压力容器,更高的抗垢剂的使用,并产生略低的渗透质量。统计分析显示了两种系统的关键运行阈值:多级反渗透系统的回收率为83%,CCRO系统的回收率为89%,超过这两个阈值后,性能会显著下降,尤其是在饲料盐度较高的情况下。从经济角度来看,在所有的案例研究中,多级RO都表现出较低的资本和总生产成本,而CCRO在采收率和能源效率方面的优势被较高的资本和化学费用所抵消。然而,如果抗结垢剂用量得到优化,CCRO在中等盐度条件下仍然是一种潜在的竞争选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
期刊最新文献
Burkholderia sp. ZF6-mediated mitigation of Cd and Zn stress in contaminated soil: effects on Chinese cabbage growth and rhizosphere microbial communities. Economic analysis of biogas-rooftop PV hybrid system for farm considering environmental benefits. Diagnostic evaluation of aerosol classification over the Indo-Gangetic Plain: insights from AE-FMF-SSA relationships. Ciprofloxacin adsorption to magnetite-pine bark biosorbents as affected by preconditioning with distinct microbiomes. Tracing environmental contaminants in magellanic penguins: Legacy POPs and metabolic clearance of PAHs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1