Comparative analysis of the inflammatory response of human gingival fibroblasts to NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers: an in vitro study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05692-1
Sarah Salah Gaafar, Abdel Rahman O El Mekkawi, Rehab Ali Farag, Mohamed H A Gadelmawla, Ahmad Mostafa Hussein Mohamad Hussein, Mohamed Sayed, Mohammad Rayyan, Doaa Gamal AbdelMouez Basta
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the inflammatory response of human gingival fibroblasts to NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers: an in vitro study.","authors":"Sarah Salah Gaafar, Abdel Rahman O El Mekkawi, Rehab Ali Farag, Mohamed H A Gadelmawla, Ahmad Mostafa Hussein Mohamad Hussein, Mohamed Sayed, Mohammad Rayyan, Doaa Gamal AbdelMouez Basta","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05692-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic quality of endodontic sealers plays a critical role in promoting the success of root canal therapy by blocking entrance of microbes as well as facilitating tissue reparative process. The bioceramic sealers NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal have been on the rise owing to their biocompatibility and bioactivity. However, their relations with periapical tissues especially human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) are still significant determinants of treatment outcomes. This in vitro case intends to analyze the inflammatory reaction of HGFs towards NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers and AH plus resin sealer as control.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>HGFs were cultured and treated with eluates of tested sealers at different dilutions; 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. The extracts were left in incubator for 1, 3, and 7 days. Cell death was determined by the MTT assay, and the secretion levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, were measured using q RT-PCR. Furthermore, mRNA and protein levels of some inflammatory markers were also estimated by q RT-PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the data showed that NeoSEALER Flo was cytotoxic in a concentration-dependent manner to HGFs, though it appeared marginally more toxic than CeraSeal when tested at the same ratios and same time. The high levels of all the measured pro-inflammatory cytokines in HGFs treated with both sealers at a higher concentration with NeoSEALER Flo showing a more intense effect. Having said so, gene expression profiles endorsed these results by showing that both sealers increase the level of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α at the higher concentrations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study indicates that both NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers activate HGFs inflammatory response with a slight preference for CeraSeal biocompatibility. Therefore, it becomes important and relevant to assess the cytotoxic and inflammatory propensity of various endodontic materials in order to guide enrolment of these endodontic products in clinical practice and improve the quality of endodontic treatment. Subsequent in vivo works should be done to confirm these in vitro findings as well as to examine the chronic effects of sealer-tissue interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"395"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11917106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05692-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic quality of endodontic sealers plays a critical role in promoting the success of root canal therapy by blocking entrance of microbes as well as facilitating tissue reparative process. The bioceramic sealers NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal have been on the rise owing to their biocompatibility and bioactivity. However, their relations with periapical tissues especially human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) are still significant determinants of treatment outcomes. This in vitro case intends to analyze the inflammatory reaction of HGFs towards NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers and AH plus resin sealer as control.

Materials and methods: HGFs were cultured and treated with eluates of tested sealers at different dilutions; 25%, 50%, 75% and 100%. The extracts were left in incubator for 1, 3, and 7 days. Cell death was determined by the MTT assay, and the secretion levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, were measured using q RT-PCR. Furthermore, mRNA and protein levels of some inflammatory markers were also estimated by q RT-PCR.

Results: Analysis of the data showed that NeoSEALER Flo was cytotoxic in a concentration-dependent manner to HGFs, though it appeared marginally more toxic than CeraSeal when tested at the same ratios and same time. The high levels of all the measured pro-inflammatory cytokines in HGFs treated with both sealers at a higher concentration with NeoSEALER Flo showing a more intense effect. Having said so, gene expression profiles endorsed these results by showing that both sealers increase the level of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α at the higher concentrations.

Conclusions: The study indicates that both NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers activate HGFs inflammatory response with a slight preference for CeraSeal biocompatibility. Therefore, it becomes important and relevant to assess the cytotoxic and inflammatory propensity of various endodontic materials in order to guide enrolment of these endodontic products in clinical practice and improve the quality of endodontic treatment. Subsequent in vivo works should be done to confirm these in vitro findings as well as to examine the chronic effects of sealer-tissue interaction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人牙龈成纤维细胞对NeoSEALER Flo和CeraSeal生物陶瓷密封剂炎症反应的比较分析:体外研究。
背景:根管密封器的治疗质量对根管治疗的成功与否起着至关重要的作用,它可以阻断微生物的进入,促进组织的修复过程。生物陶瓷密封剂NeoSEALER Flo和CeraSeal由于其生物相容性和生物活性而一直处于上升趋势。然而,它们与根尖周围组织特别是人类牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFs)的关系仍然是治疗结果的重要决定因素。本体外实验旨在分析hgf对NeoSEALER Flo和CeraSeal生物陶瓷密封剂和AH +树脂密封剂的炎症反应。材料和方法:用不同稀释度的被试密封剂洗脱液培养和处理HGFs;25%, 50%, 75%和100%。提取液分别在培养箱中保存1、3、7天。MTT法测定细胞死亡,RT-PCR法测定促炎细胞因子如IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α的分泌水平。此外,还通过RT-PCR检测了一些炎症标志物的mRNA和蛋白水平。结果:数据分析显示,NeoSEALER Flo对hgf具有浓度依赖性的细胞毒性,但在相同比例和相同时间检测时,其毒性略高于CeraSeal。两种密封剂处理的hgf中,所有促炎细胞因子的水平都很高,NeoSEALER Flo的浓度越高,效果越强。话虽如此,基因表达谱证实了这些结果,表明两种封口剂在较高浓度下都增加了IL-6、IL-8和TNF-α的水平。结论:研究表明,NeoSEALER Flo和CeraSeal生物陶瓷密封剂都能激活hgf炎症反应,并对CeraSeal生物相容性有轻微的偏好。因此,评估各种根管材料的细胞毒性和炎症倾向,以指导这些根管产品在临床实践中的选用,提高根管治疗的质量,变得非常重要和相关。随后的体内工作应该进行,以证实这些体外研究结果,以及检查密封组织相互作用的慢性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Fracture resistance and mode of failure of CAD/CAM milled versus 3D-printed resin composite inlays: an in vitro study. The true dentoskeletal changes following miniscrew-assisted molar intrusion in anterior open bite: a superimposition study on mandibular autorotation. Radiation-induced oral side effects in head and neck cancer: a scoping review and interdisciplinary recommendations. Correlation between different vertical facial patterns and mandibular incisor alveolar bone loss in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion during pre-surgical orthodontic decompensation. Evaluation of midpalatal suture maturation in young adults using cone-beam computed tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1