Changes in the mechanical properties of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus allograft depending on sterilization method and storage time.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Bone & Joint Research Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.143.BJR-2024-0129.R2
Dénes Faragó, Atilla F Karácsony, Zsanett Orlovits, Karoly Pap, Rita M Kiss
{"title":"Changes in the mechanical properties of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus allograft depending on sterilization method and storage time.","authors":"Dénes Faragó, Atilla F Karácsony, Zsanett Orlovits, Karoly Pap, Rita M Kiss","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.143.BJR-2024-0129.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the present research was to analyze the effects of different sterilization methods and storage times on the mechanical properties (load at first break, strain at first break, maximum load, strain at maximum load, and Young's modulus of elasticity) of different allografts compared to native groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two types of grafts were harvested from human cadavers: 165 tibialis anterior (TA) and 166 peroneus longus (PL) tendons. According to the two types of sterilization methods (γ and electron beam irradiation) or the lack of one, and the six types of storage time (one to six months), 36 groups were created. In addition, we created a 1 to 1 native group, which was not sterilized and stored, tested within four hours of collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the results of tendon type TA compared to TA native group, we observed significant differences at the fifth month of storage for all measured parameters. Load at first break of the frozen values at the fifth month was significantly inferior to the native group (p = 0.034). For strain at first break and strain at maximum load, all sterilization methods were significantly inferior at the fifth month (p = 0.003 to p = 0.009). Maximum load values were significantly superior with E-beam irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.003), and also significantly higher with γ irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.009). Young's modulus showed significantly inferior values in the frozen tendons at the fifth month (p = 0.001 to p = 0.003). In tendon type PL, no significant differences were found for any of the tested parameters compared to the native group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that freezing alters mechanical properties via the decrease seen in the ultimate tensile strength. In addition, at the fifth and sixth months of storage, time could notably affect allografts rather than the sterilization procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"270-280"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.143.BJR-2024-0129.R2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the present research was to analyze the effects of different sterilization methods and storage times on the mechanical properties (load at first break, strain at first break, maximum load, strain at maximum load, and Young's modulus of elasticity) of different allografts compared to native groups.

Methods: Two types of grafts were harvested from human cadavers: 165 tibialis anterior (TA) and 166 peroneus longus (PL) tendons. According to the two types of sterilization methods (γ and electron beam irradiation) or the lack of one, and the six types of storage time (one to six months), 36 groups were created. In addition, we created a 1 to 1 native group, which was not sterilized and stored, tested within four hours of collection.

Results: In the results of tendon type TA compared to TA native group, we observed significant differences at the fifth month of storage for all measured parameters. Load at first break of the frozen values at the fifth month was significantly inferior to the native group (p = 0.034). For strain at first break and strain at maximum load, all sterilization methods were significantly inferior at the fifth month (p = 0.003 to p = 0.009). Maximum load values were significantly superior with E-beam irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.003), and also significantly higher with γ irradiation at the fifth month (p = 0.009). Young's modulus showed significantly inferior values in the frozen tendons at the fifth month (p = 0.001 to p = 0.003). In tendon type PL, no significant differences were found for any of the tested parameters compared to the native group.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that freezing alters mechanical properties via the decrease seen in the ultimate tensile strength. In addition, at the fifth and sixth months of storage, time could notably affect allografts rather than the sterilization procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the causal relationship between 28 circulating biomarkers and osteoarthritis : a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Changes in the mechanical properties of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus allograft depending on sterilization method and storage time. Orientin alleviates chondrocyte senescence and osteoarthritis by inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway. The effect of metaphyseal holes and interposition material on the longitudinal growth stimulation of long bones in a rabbit model. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1