Minimizing stroke risk in off-pump CABG: the role of clampless devices and the piggyback proximal anastomosis technique.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555394
Massimo Baudo, Francesco Cabrucci, Amanda Yakobitis, Courtney Murray, Gianluca Torregrossa
{"title":"Minimizing stroke risk in off-pump CABG: the role of clampless devices and the piggyback proximal anastomosis technique.","authors":"Massimo Baudo, Francesco Cabrucci, Amanda Yakobitis, Courtney Murray, Gianluca Torregrossa","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous techniques have been developed to minimize risk of perioperative stroke during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), including off-pump approach, preoperative and intraoperative imaging of the ascending aorta (CT scan and epiaortic ultrasound), anaortic CABG with bilateral internal thoracic artery, clampless devices for the construction of proximal anastomosis and minimal aortic manipulation with a single aortic inflow for all proximal grafts (piggyback proximal anastomosis). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CABG patients who underwent off pump CABG with proximal anastomosis constructed with the use of a clampless device and in a piggyback fashion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included 112 consecutive patients undergoing CABG with the piggyback proximal technique at the Lankenau Heart Institute between June 2021 and January 2024. Primary endpoints included overall mortality, cardiac-related mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization. Intraoperative transit time flow measurement (TTFM) was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 67.8 ± 8.7 years, with 75.9% (85/112) being male. All patients underwent off-pump CABG. The piggyback anastomosis consisted of vein-on-vein (52.7%, 59/112), artery-on-vein (43.8%, 49/112), and double vein/artery configurations (3.6%, 4/112). Postoperatively, no strokes occurred. At 30 days no patient died or required repeat revascularization. The mean hospital stay was 5.5 [4.0-8.0] days. At a mean follow-up of 1.0 [0.5-1.7] years, no cardiac deaths were recorded, with an overall survival of 98.2% (110/112). Repeat piggyback revascularization was 3.6% (4/112) at a mean of 2.0 ± 0.5 years. TTFM demonstrated superior flow rates in artery-on-vein grafts [50 (40-70) ml/min] compared to vein-on-vein grafts [40 (30-53.5), <i>p</i> < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When a proximal anastomosis cannot be avoided during off pump CABG, the combination of a piggyback proximal anastomosis together with the use of a clampless aortic device, demonstrated promising early mid-term outcomes almost nullifying the perioperative risk of clinical stroke. Intraoperative TTFM showed excellent flow rates, especially when arterial grafts were used. The technique is a viable option in high-risk patients with severe aortic disease, offering a safe and effective approach to multivessel revascularization with minimal aortic manipulation. Further studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm its long-term benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1555394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1555394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous techniques have been developed to minimize risk of perioperative stroke during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), including off-pump approach, preoperative and intraoperative imaging of the ascending aorta (CT scan and epiaortic ultrasound), anaortic CABG with bilateral internal thoracic artery, clampless devices for the construction of proximal anastomosis and minimal aortic manipulation with a single aortic inflow for all proximal grafts (piggyback proximal anastomosis). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of CABG patients who underwent off pump CABG with proximal anastomosis constructed with the use of a clampless device and in a piggyback fashion.

Methods: This observational study included 112 consecutive patients undergoing CABG with the piggyback proximal technique at the Lankenau Heart Institute between June 2021 and January 2024. Primary endpoints included overall mortality, cardiac-related mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization. Intraoperative transit time flow measurement (TTFM) was also analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 67.8 ± 8.7 years, with 75.9% (85/112) being male. All patients underwent off-pump CABG. The piggyback anastomosis consisted of vein-on-vein (52.7%, 59/112), artery-on-vein (43.8%, 49/112), and double vein/artery configurations (3.6%, 4/112). Postoperatively, no strokes occurred. At 30 days no patient died or required repeat revascularization. The mean hospital stay was 5.5 [4.0-8.0] days. At a mean follow-up of 1.0 [0.5-1.7] years, no cardiac deaths were recorded, with an overall survival of 98.2% (110/112). Repeat piggyback revascularization was 3.6% (4/112) at a mean of 2.0 ± 0.5 years. TTFM demonstrated superior flow rates in artery-on-vein grafts [50 (40-70) ml/min] compared to vein-on-vein grafts [40 (30-53.5), p < 0.001].

Conclusions: When a proximal anastomosis cannot be avoided during off pump CABG, the combination of a piggyback proximal anastomosis together with the use of a clampless aortic device, demonstrated promising early mid-term outcomes almost nullifying the perioperative risk of clinical stroke. Intraoperative TTFM showed excellent flow rates, especially when arterial grafts were used. The technique is a viable option in high-risk patients with severe aortic disease, offering a safe and effective approach to multivessel revascularization with minimal aortic manipulation. Further studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm its long-term benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
期刊最新文献
Case Report: Two highly unusual adrenal tumors presenting with hypertension: a giant cystic pheochromocytoma with an ipsilateral large renal parapelvic cyst and a giant adrenal myelolipoma. Cor Triatriatum: an uncommon congenital anomaly - the experience of a tertiary care center in a developing country. Examining the use of a continuous marker of metabolic syndrome severity for detecting resting autonomic dysfunction in a multiracial sample of young adults. Interpreting clinical outcomes using different strut thickness in coronary artery disease: insights from vascular imaging analysis. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing identifies native valve Aspergillus fumigatus endocarditis with cerebral involvement: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1