Differences in lower limb co-contraction calculations vary clinical interpretation of aquatic treadmill walking in typically developing and children with cerebral palsy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1506326
Joseph W Harrington, Brian A Knarr, Vivek Dutt, David C Kingston
{"title":"Differences in lower limb co-contraction calculations vary clinical interpretation of aquatic treadmill walking in typically developing and children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Joseph W Harrington, Brian A Knarr, Vivek Dutt, David C Kingston","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1506326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate muscle co-contraction during aquatic (Wet) and conventional (Dry) treadmill walking at various speeds in typically developing (TD) and children with cerebral palsy (CP) and (2) explore how the clinical interpretation of co-contraction, using co-contraction indices (CCI), may vary depending on the method employed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen TD children (30 limbs, 7 M | 8F, 11.3 ± 4.1 yrs., 1.46 ± 0.18 m, 44.2 ± 16.8 kg) and 10 children with CP (20 limbs, 6 M | 4F, 13.1 ± 3.5 yrs., 1.54 ± 0.18 m, 53.2 ± 26.2 kg, 7 GMFCS I and 3 II) participated in this study. Muscle activity of the tibialis anterior (TA), rectus femoris (RF), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded during three 3-min walking trials on a Dry treadmill followed by a Wet treadmill. Muscle co-contraction was calculated using three common CCI calculation methods for the RF/ST and TA/MG muscle pairings. Separate linear mixed-effects models examined the influence of population (TD vs. CP), walking speed (Slow, Normal, Fast), and treadmill environment (Dry vs. Wet) on CCI for each equation and muscle pairing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCI<sub>Unnithan</sub> and CCI<sub>Rudolph</sub> demonstrated that aquatic treadmill walking reduced muscle co-contraction in TD (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and CP (<i>p</i> < 0.012) populations for the RF/ST muscle pairing. Additionally, CCI<sub>Unnithan</sub> and CCI<sub>Rudolph</sub> showed significant differences between speeds in both environments (<i>p</i> < 0.001) except for the Slow-Normal comparison in the aquatic treadmill (<i>p</i> > 0.423). All methods had a significant CCI reduction in the TA/MG muscle pairing for both populations. For the RF/ST muscle pairing, CCI<sub>F&W</sub> showed that only TD children had lower muscle co-contraction in the aquatic treadmill (<i>p</i> = 0.023). CCI<sub>F&W</sub> also showed no speed effect for the muscle pairings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows the potential of aquatic treadmill walking to reduce muscle co-contraction; however, caution is recommended as clinical implications can vary due to the computation method. Future studies should aim to report values from multiple methods to account for the variability within methods and validation of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1506326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1506326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate muscle co-contraction during aquatic (Wet) and conventional (Dry) treadmill walking at various speeds in typically developing (TD) and children with cerebral palsy (CP) and (2) explore how the clinical interpretation of co-contraction, using co-contraction indices (CCI), may vary depending on the method employed.

Methods: Fifteen TD children (30 limbs, 7 M | 8F, 11.3 ± 4.1 yrs., 1.46 ± 0.18 m, 44.2 ± 16.8 kg) and 10 children with CP (20 limbs, 6 M | 4F, 13.1 ± 3.5 yrs., 1.54 ± 0.18 m, 53.2 ± 26.2 kg, 7 GMFCS I and 3 II) participated in this study. Muscle activity of the tibialis anterior (TA), rectus femoris (RF), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and semitendinosus (ST) was recorded during three 3-min walking trials on a Dry treadmill followed by a Wet treadmill. Muscle co-contraction was calculated using three common CCI calculation methods for the RF/ST and TA/MG muscle pairings. Separate linear mixed-effects models examined the influence of population (TD vs. CP), walking speed (Slow, Normal, Fast), and treadmill environment (Dry vs. Wet) on CCI for each equation and muscle pairing.

Results: CCIUnnithan and CCIRudolph demonstrated that aquatic treadmill walking reduced muscle co-contraction in TD (p < 0.001) and CP (p < 0.012) populations for the RF/ST muscle pairing. Additionally, CCIUnnithan and CCIRudolph showed significant differences between speeds in both environments (p < 0.001) except for the Slow-Normal comparison in the aquatic treadmill (p > 0.423). All methods had a significant CCI reduction in the TA/MG muscle pairing for both populations. For the RF/ST muscle pairing, CCIF&W showed that only TD children had lower muscle co-contraction in the aquatic treadmill (p = 0.023). CCIF&W also showed no speed effect for the muscle pairings.

Conclusion: This study shows the potential of aquatic treadmill walking to reduce muscle co-contraction; however, caution is recommended as clinical implications can vary due to the computation method. Future studies should aim to report values from multiple methods to account for the variability within methods and validation of results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
典型发育不良儿童和脑瘫儿童下肢共收缩计算的差异会影响水上跑步机行走的临床解释。
目的:本研究的目的是:(1)研究正常发育(TD)和脑瘫(CP)儿童在不同速度的水上(湿)和常规(干)跑步机上行走时的肌肉共同收缩;(2)探讨使用共同收缩指数(CCI)对共同收缩的临床解释如何因所采用的方法而有所不同。方法:15例TD患儿(30条肢体,7例 M | 8F, 11.3 ± 4.1 岁)。44.2, 1.46 ±0.18  m, ±16.8  公斤)和10个孩子CP(20四肢,6 m | 4 f, 13.1±3.5  年。(1.54 ± 0.18 m, 53.2 ± 26.2 kg, 7个GMFCS I和3个II)参与了本研究。分别在干跑步机上和湿跑步机上进行3分钟步行试验,记录胫骨前肌(TA)、股直肌(RF)、腓骨内侧肌(MG)和半腱肌(ST)的肌肉活动。使用三种常见的CCI计算方法计算RF/ST和TA/MG肌肉对的肌肉共收缩。单独的线性混合效应模型检验了人群(TD vs. CP)、步行速度(慢、正常、快速)和跑步机环境(干、湿)对每个方程和肌肉配对的CCI的影响。结果:CCIUnnithan和CCIRudolph证明水上跑步机行走减少了TD的肌肉共同收缩(p p Unnithan和CCIRudolph在两种环境下的速度之间存在显著差异(p p > 0.423)。两种方法在TA/MG肌肉配对中均有显著的CCI降低。对于RF/ST肌肉配对,CCIF&W显示,只有TD儿童在水上跑步机上有较低的肌肉共收缩(p = 0.023)。CCIF&W对肌肉配对也没有速度效应。结论:本研究显示水上跑步机行走具有减少肌肉联合收缩的潜力;然而,由于计算方法的不同,临床意义可能会有所不同,因此建议谨慎。未来的研究应旨在报告多种方法的值,以解释方法内的可变性和结果的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic migraine: a protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. An exploratory analysis of ACNS electroencephalography patterns in 34 comatose patients after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Breaking the learned helplessness paradigm in chronic stroke: an intensive neuroplasticity framework bridging European technology and African innovation. A meta-analysis of the effects of dual-task training on cognitive function in stroke patients. Predicting cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: a machine learning approach based on clinical and neuropsychological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1