Facial Aging in Thyroid Eye Disease: Quantification by Artificial Intelligence.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011224
Persiana S Saffari, Jason C Strawbridge, Kelsey A Roelofs, Daniel B Rootman, Robert A Goldberg, Justin N Karlin
{"title":"Facial Aging in Thyroid Eye Disease: Quantification by Artificial Intelligence.","authors":"Persiana S Saffari, Jason C Strawbridge, Kelsey A Roelofs, Daniel B Rootman, Robert A Goldberg, Justin N Karlin","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to elucidate the effect of thyroid eye disease on perceived facial aging. In this cross-sectional cohort study, an artificial intelligence (AI) model (previously trained to infer patient age from facial photographs) was used to analyze facial aging changes in 2 groups: (1) TED patients and (2) age-matched controls. Standardized photos were analyzed from initial and final visits of patients with more than 5 years of clinic follow-up. The performance of the AI model was compared to that of an expert group composed of oculoplastic surgeons. Chronological, AI-inferred, and expert-estimated ages were compared. AI initially estimated TED subjects to be 4.3 years older than their actual age, compared to 0.63 years older in control subjects (P=0.005). At the final timepoint, TED patients were estimated to be 5.0 years younger than their actual age, compared to 1.4 years younger in controls (P=0.004). The mean difference between actual and AI-inferred change in age was 9.3 years for TED patients and 2.0 years for controls (P<0.001). Human experts tended to underestimate age across all groups and time points. The AI model was significantly more accurate than human experts in estimating the age of controls at the final time point. AI estimated that TED patients were older than their chronological age initially and younger than their chronological age at the final follow-up. This may be due to initial pathologic soft tissue volume expansion in TED, which may compensate for age-related soft tissue deflation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to elucidate the effect of thyroid eye disease on perceived facial aging. In this cross-sectional cohort study, an artificial intelligence (AI) model (previously trained to infer patient age from facial photographs) was used to analyze facial aging changes in 2 groups: (1) TED patients and (2) age-matched controls. Standardized photos were analyzed from initial and final visits of patients with more than 5 years of clinic follow-up. The performance of the AI model was compared to that of an expert group composed of oculoplastic surgeons. Chronological, AI-inferred, and expert-estimated ages were compared. AI initially estimated TED subjects to be 4.3 years older than their actual age, compared to 0.63 years older in control subjects (P=0.005). At the final timepoint, TED patients were estimated to be 5.0 years younger than their actual age, compared to 1.4 years younger in controls (P=0.004). The mean difference between actual and AI-inferred change in age was 9.3 years for TED patients and 2.0 years for controls (P<0.001). Human experts tended to underestimate age across all groups and time points. The AI model was significantly more accurate than human experts in estimating the age of controls at the final time point. AI estimated that TED patients were older than their chronological age initially and younger than their chronological age at the final follow-up. This may be due to initial pathologic soft tissue volume expansion in TED, which may compensate for age-related soft tissue deflation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺眼病的面部衰老:人工智能量化
本研究旨在探讨甲状腺眼病对面部衰老的影响。在这项横断面队列研究中,使用人工智能(AI)模型(之前经过训练可以从面部照片推断患者年龄)来分析两组患者的面部衰老变化:(1)TED患者和(2)年龄匹配的对照组。对临床随访超过5年的患者初访和终访的标准化照片进行分析。将人工智能模型的性能与由眼科医生组成的专家组的性能进行比较。将实际年龄、人工智能推断年龄和专家估计年龄进行比较。AI最初估计TED受试者的年龄比实际年龄大4.3岁,而对照组受试者的年龄比实际年龄大0.63岁(P=0.005)。在最终时间点,TED患者的年龄估计比实际年龄小5.0岁,而对照组的年龄估计比实际年龄小1.4岁(P=0.004)。TED患者的实际年龄变化与人工智能推断的年龄变化的平均差异为9.3岁,对照组为2.0岁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Lower Blepharoplasty With Subobicularis Oculi Fat Lift and Fat Pad Transposition in Middle-Aged Patients. Cheek Advancement Flap for Upper Lip Reconstruction While Preserving Aesthetic Units: Experience With 7 Pediatric Cases. Volumetric Assessment of Blow-Out Fractures With Automated Segmentation Benefits Thinner Computed Tomography Slice Thickness: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. In Memory of John Mulliken: Caretaker of Patients and Educator of All. Clinical and Quantitative Radiologic Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates: Implications for Surgical Planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1