Outcomes in Patients With Mitral Annular Disjunction and an Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1111/jce.16612
Fatima M Ezzeddine, Jee Won Jennifer Shin, Konstantinos C Siontis, Ammar M Killu, John Giudicessi, Michael J Ackerman, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Gurukripa N Kowlgi, Malini Madhavan, Christopher J McLeod, Samuel J Asirvatham, Freddy Del-Carpio Munoz
{"title":"Outcomes in Patients With Mitral Annular Disjunction and an Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator.","authors":"Fatima M Ezzeddine, Jee Won Jennifer Shin, Konstantinos C Siontis, Ammar M Killu, John Giudicessi, Michael J Ackerman, Abhishek J Deshmukh, Gurukripa N Kowlgi, Malini Madhavan, Christopher J McLeod, Samuel J Asirvatham, Freddy Del-Carpio Munoz","doi":"10.1111/jce.16612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) carries an increased risk of complex ventricular arrhythmias, which can lead to sudden cardiac death. Many of these patients undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, but their ICD outcomes are not known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of ICD implantation and the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies in patients with MAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients with MAD who underwent ICD implantation. Clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging, and device therapy data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine patients with MAD and ICD were included. Median age was 49 (21) years, and 29 (59%) were female. 13 (27%) patients underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention and 36 (73%) patients for secondary prevention. Over a median follow-up of 27.3 (35.3) months, 23 (47%) patients received ICD therapies. 18 (37%) patients had appropriate ICD therapies, and 5 (10%) patients had inappropriate ICD shocks. Median time to first appropriate therapy was 22.3 (63.3) months. In patients with a secondary prevention ICD indication, the rate of appropriate ICD therapies was 44%, while in patients with a primary prevention ICD indication, it was 15%. Among patients with appropriate ICD therapies, the first therapies were delivered for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 7 (39%) patients and polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 11 (61%) patients. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more likely to have a history of SCA (p = 0.003) and/or low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p = 0.022) before ICD implantation as compared to patients without appropriate ICD therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of patients with MAD and ICD, appropriate ICD therapies were common. Most appropriate ICD therapies were delivered for polymorphic VT or VF. Larger studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of VAs and refine risk stratification in MAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) carries an increased risk of complex ventricular arrhythmias, which can lead to sudden cardiac death. Many of these patients undergo implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, but their ICD outcomes are not known.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of ICD implantation and the predictors of appropriate ICD therapies in patients with MAD.

Methods: The study included patients with MAD who underwent ICD implantation. Clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging, and device therapy data were collected.

Results: Forty-nine patients with MAD and ICD were included. Median age was 49 (21) years, and 29 (59%) were female. 13 (27%) patients underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention and 36 (73%) patients for secondary prevention. Over a median follow-up of 27.3 (35.3) months, 23 (47%) patients received ICD therapies. 18 (37%) patients had appropriate ICD therapies, and 5 (10%) patients had inappropriate ICD shocks. Median time to first appropriate therapy was 22.3 (63.3) months. In patients with a secondary prevention ICD indication, the rate of appropriate ICD therapies was 44%, while in patients with a primary prevention ICD indication, it was 15%. Among patients with appropriate ICD therapies, the first therapies were delivered for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 7 (39%) patients and polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 11 (61%) patients. Patients with appropriate ICD therapies were more likely to have a history of SCA (p = 0.003) and/or low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p = 0.022) before ICD implantation as compared to patients without appropriate ICD therapies.

Conclusions: In our cohort of patients with MAD and ICD, appropriate ICD therapies were common. Most appropriate ICD therapies were delivered for polymorphic VT or VF. Larger studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of VAs and refine risk stratification in MAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Endo-Epicardial vs. Endocardial-Only Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The EPIC-VT Trial Design. Concerns Regarding "Echocardiographic Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator". Distribution Variance of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Foci and Long-Term Outcomes After Ablation: Experience From Two Chinese Centers. Factors Affecting the Impact of LBBBP on Ventricular Electrical Activation. Introduction of the Low Voltage Bridge Mapping for the AVNRT RF Ablation in Children - Early Follow-Up Results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1