Trifecta of Same-Day Discharge after Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0930
Hakan Bahadir Haberal, Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Giulio Avesani, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan Ramon Torres-Anguiano, Simone Crivellaro
{"title":"Trifecta of Same-Day Discharge after Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy.","authors":"Hakan Bahadir Haberal, Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Giulio Avesani, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Muhannad Aljoulani, Ruben Calvo Sauer, Juan Ramon Torres-Anguiano, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> There are numerous options available for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia, and single-port robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP-RASP) has emerged as a novel method in this field. In this study, we aim to define the trifecta of same-day discharge (SDD) and identify the factors associated with the trifecta of SDD following SP-RASP. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Data from 95 patients who underwent SP-RASP between February 2020 and July 2024 at a single center by a single surgeon were evaluated. The trifecta of SDD was defined as a patient being discharged on the same day without experiencing any 90-day postoperative complications and no readmissions. The factors associated with predicting the trifecta of SDD were investigated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 95 SP-RASP cases were successfully performed without the need for conversion to alternative approaches, and 54 patients (56.8%) were included in the trifecta of the SDD-achieved group. The reasons for failure included 23 patients (24.2%) requiring postoperative hospitalization from the recovery area, 24 patients (25.3%) experiencing postoperative complications, and 2 patients (2.1%) needing readmission within 90 days after discharge. There was a 0% incidence of major postoperative complications (≥Clavien-Dindo grade 3). When comparing the groups, trifecta-achieved patients showed lower estimated blood loss, smaller specimen weight, lower percentage of adenoma removed, and a reduced rate of opioid prescriptions at discharge (<i>p</i> = 0.005, 0.033, 0.025, and 0.026, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, specimen weight was the only factor significantly associated with trifecta following SP-RASP (<i>p</i> = 0.018). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In our cohort, 56% of patients were classified within the trifecta group, with no major postoperative complications observed following SP-RASP. Specimen weight was the only independent predictor of trifecta achievement in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"477-481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0930","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are numerous options available for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia, and single-port robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (SP-RASP) has emerged as a novel method in this field. In this study, we aim to define the trifecta of same-day discharge (SDD) and identify the factors associated with the trifecta of SDD following SP-RASP. Materials and Methods: Data from 95 patients who underwent SP-RASP between February 2020 and July 2024 at a single center by a single surgeon were evaluated. The trifecta of SDD was defined as a patient being discharged on the same day without experiencing any 90-day postoperative complications and no readmissions. The factors associated with predicting the trifecta of SDD were investigated. Results: A total of 95 SP-RASP cases were successfully performed without the need for conversion to alternative approaches, and 54 patients (56.8%) were included in the trifecta of the SDD-achieved group. The reasons for failure included 23 patients (24.2%) requiring postoperative hospitalization from the recovery area, 24 patients (25.3%) experiencing postoperative complications, and 2 patients (2.1%) needing readmission within 90 days after discharge. There was a 0% incidence of major postoperative complications (≥Clavien-Dindo grade 3). When comparing the groups, trifecta-achieved patients showed lower estimated blood loss, smaller specimen weight, lower percentage of adenoma removed, and a reduced rate of opioid prescriptions at discharge (p = 0.005, 0.033, 0.025, and 0.026, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, specimen weight was the only factor significantly associated with trifecta following SP-RASP (p = 0.018). Conclusion: In our cohort, 56% of patients were classified within the trifecta group, with no major postoperative complications observed following SP-RASP. Specimen weight was the only independent predictor of trifecta achievement in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单端口机器人辅助简单前列腺切除术后当日出院的三联体。
导言:良性前列腺增生的手术治疗有多种选择,单端口机器人辅助简单前列腺切除术(SP-RASP)已成为该领域的一种新方法。在本研究中,我们的目的是定义当天放电(SDD)的三倍,并确定与SP-RASP后SDD三倍相关的因素。材料和方法:对2020年2月至2024年7月在同一中心接受SP-RASP手术的95例患者的数据进行评估。SDD三联体定义为患者当日出院,无术后90天并发症,无再入院。对预测SDD三联体的相关因素进行了研究。结果:共有95例SP-RASP患者成功完成手术,无需转行其他入路,54例(56.8%)患者被纳入sdd实现组的三联体。失败原因包括需要术后住院的患者23例(24.2%),术后出现并发症的患者24例(25.3%),出院后90天内需要再入院的患者2例(2.1%)。术后主要并发症发生率为0%(≥Clavien-Dindo 3级)。在两组比较时,获得三联体的患者估计失血量更低,标本重量更小,腺瘤移除率更低,出院时阿片类药物处方率更低(p分别= 0.005,0.033,0.025和0.026)。在多因素logistic回归分析中,SP-RASP后,标本重量是唯一与三头虫显著相关的因素(p = 0.018)。结论:在我们的队列中,56%的患者被归为三连用组,SP-RASP术后未观察到重大并发症。在这些患者中,标本重量是唯一独立的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Management of Renal Stones in Pediatric Age Group Less Than 6 Years with Renal Stones Less Than 20 mm. A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Comparative Pressure Measurement Performance of the Glean Urodynamics System-a Novel Wireless and Catheter-Free Urodynamics Device. Evaluating Visual Discomfort Among Robotic Urologic Surgeons: Insights from A Survey on Eye Strain and Accommodative Lag. Is Fluoroscopy Needed for Endourologic Treatment of Ureteral and Renal Stones? Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies by the FUTURE Collaborative of the Endourological Society. Validation of a Renal Papillary Grading System: Comparison of Patients Forming Calcium Oxalate and Apatite Stones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1