Obsessional thinking and autistic traits are each uniquely associated with greater traits of gender dysphoria in clinical and nonclinical adult samples.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Molecular Autism Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1186/s13229-025-00649-1
Karl Mears, Dheeraj Rai, Punit Shah, Chris Ashwin
{"title":"Obsessional thinking and autistic traits are each uniquely associated with greater traits of gender dysphoria in clinical and nonclinical adult samples.","authors":"Karl Mears, Dheeraj Rai, Punit Shah, Chris Ashwin","doi":"10.1186/s13229-025-00649-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research has demonstrated a strong relationship between autism and gender dysphoria (GD) and that this relationship could be explained by obsessional interests which are characteristic of autism. However, these studies often measured obsessions using either single items which questions the reliability of the findings, or within autistic trait measures meaning the findings may simply index a more general relationship between autistic traits and GD. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the relationships between obsessional thoughts and traits of GD using a measure of obsessional thoughts alongside a measure of autistic traits, which was investigated in both non-clinical and clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 145 non-clinical participants took part in Study 1 and all completed the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) as a measure of autistic traits, the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) obsessional thoughts subscale as a measure of obsessional thoughts, and the Gender-Identity/Gender-Dysphoria Questionnaire (GIDYQ) to measure traits of GD. For Study 2, a total of 226 participants took part in Study 2 and all completed the same measures as in Study 1. They included participants diagnosed with GD (N = 49), autism (N = 65), OCD (N = 46) and controls with no diagnosis (N = 66).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hierarchical linear regression for Study 1 showed that both total AQ and OCI-R obsessional thoughts scores were uniquely associated with GIDYQ scores, with no interaction effect between the scores. The results for Study 2, from a hierarchical linear regression, once again found that obsessional thoughts and autistic traits were each uniquely associated with GIDYQ scores, but not their interaction. The GD and autistic groups both reported significantly greater traits of GD than the OCD and control groups, with the GD group reporting higher scores than the autistic group.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Participants self-reported their diagnoses for Study 2, but diagnostic tests to verify these were not administered. Traits of GD were also measured at a single point in time, despite such traits being transient and continuous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results show both obsessional thoughts and autistic traits are uniquely associated with GD, and that autistic people experience greater traits of GD than other clinical groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":18733,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Autism","volume":"16 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Autism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-025-00649-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research has demonstrated a strong relationship between autism and gender dysphoria (GD) and that this relationship could be explained by obsessional interests which are characteristic of autism. However, these studies often measured obsessions using either single items which questions the reliability of the findings, or within autistic trait measures meaning the findings may simply index a more general relationship between autistic traits and GD. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the relationships between obsessional thoughts and traits of GD using a measure of obsessional thoughts alongside a measure of autistic traits, which was investigated in both non-clinical and clinical samples.

Methods: A total of 145 non-clinical participants took part in Study 1 and all completed the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) as a measure of autistic traits, the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) obsessional thoughts subscale as a measure of obsessional thoughts, and the Gender-Identity/Gender-Dysphoria Questionnaire (GIDYQ) to measure traits of GD. For Study 2, a total of 226 participants took part in Study 2 and all completed the same measures as in Study 1. They included participants diagnosed with GD (N = 49), autism (N = 65), OCD (N = 46) and controls with no diagnosis (N = 66).

Results: The hierarchical linear regression for Study 1 showed that both total AQ and OCI-R obsessional thoughts scores were uniquely associated with GIDYQ scores, with no interaction effect between the scores. The results for Study 2, from a hierarchical linear regression, once again found that obsessional thoughts and autistic traits were each uniquely associated with GIDYQ scores, but not their interaction. The GD and autistic groups both reported significantly greater traits of GD than the OCD and control groups, with the GD group reporting higher scores than the autistic group.

Limitations: Participants self-reported their diagnoses for Study 2, but diagnostic tests to verify these were not administered. Traits of GD were also measured at a single point in time, despite such traits being transient and continuous.

Conclusions: The results show both obsessional thoughts and autistic traits are uniquely associated with GD, and that autistic people experience greater traits of GD than other clinical groups.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床和非临床成人样本中,强迫性思维和自闭特征都与性别焦虑的更大特征有独特的联系。
背景:研究表明自闭症和性别焦虑(GD)之间有很强的关系,这种关系可以用自闭症特征的强迫性兴趣来解释。然而,这些研究通常使用单个项目来测量强迫症,这质疑了研究结果的可靠性,或者在自闭症特征测量中,这意味着研究结果可能只是简单地索引了自闭症特征和焦虑之间更普遍的关系。因此,本研究旨在探讨强迫思想与焦虑特征之间的关系,使用强迫思想和自闭症特征的测量,在非临床和临床样本中进行了调查。方法:145名非临床被试参加研究1,所有被试均完成了衡量自闭症特征的自闭症谱系商(AQ)、衡量强迫症的强迫思维量表(OCI-R)和衡量强迫症特征的性别认同/性别焦虑问卷(GIDYQ)。在研究2中,共有226名参与者参加了研究2,所有参与者都完成了与研究1相同的测量。他们包括被诊断为GD (N = 49)、自闭症(N = 65)、强迫症(N = 46)和未被诊断为强迫症的对照组(N = 66)。结果:研究1的层次线性回归结果显示,总AQ和OCI-R强迫思想得分与GIDYQ得分均有独特的相关性,两者之间无交互作用。研究2的结果,从层次线性回归,再次发现强迫症思想和自闭症特征都与GIDYQ分数有独特的联系,但不是它们的相互作用。焦虑组和自闭症组报告的焦虑特征均显著高于强迫症组和对照组,焦虑组报告的得分高于自闭症组。局限性:在研究2中,参与者自我报告了他们的诊断,但没有进行诊断测试来验证这些诊断。GD的性状也在一个时间点测量,尽管这些性状是短暂的和连续的。结论:强迫症和自闭症特征与焦虑焦虑有独特的关系,自闭症患者的焦虑焦虑特征明显高于其他临床人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Autism
Molecular Autism GENETICS & HEREDITY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Autism is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes high-quality basic, translational and clinical research that has relevance to the etiology, pathobiology, or treatment of autism and related neurodevelopmental conditions. Research that includes integration across levels is encouraged. Molecular Autism publishes empirical studies, reviews, and brief communications.
期刊最新文献
Loss of the Mecp2 gene in parvalbumin interneurons leads to an inhibitory deficit in the amygdala and affects its functional connectivity. Early developmental trajectory phenotypes for risk stratification of autism spectrum disorder in very preterm infants: a machine learning approach. A systematic review of statistical learning in autism spectrum disorder. Dim light at night disrupts the sleep-wake cycle and exacerbates abnormal EEG activity in Cntnap2 knockout mice: implications for autism spectrum disorders. Atypical GNAO1 variants in severe childhood speech disorders: clinical, genetic, and molecular insights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1