Clinical Efficacy of a Modified Posteromedial Oblique Incision in the Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fractures: A Single-centre, Single-arm, Prospective Study.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.4103/npmj.npmj_257_24
Zeming Li, Chuanliang Chen, Xifan Zheng, Junling Luo, Hongtao Wang, Jun Yao
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy of a Modified Posteromedial Oblique Incision in the Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fractures: A Single-centre, Single-arm, Prospective Study.","authors":"Zeming Li, Chuanliang Chen, Xifan Zheng, Junling Luo, Hongtao Wang, Jun Yao","doi":"10.4103/npmj.npmj_257_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified posteromedial oblique incision (POI) in the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial avulsion fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre, single-arm, prospective study. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were collected between September 2022 and June 2024 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. Patients were followed up to the study endpoint, and the safety and efficacy of the POI were inferred by analysing the follow-up data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The angle was 67.20 ± 3.16°, the |OM| was 2.48 ± 0.13 cm, the |ON| was 1.33 ± 0.12 cm. The incision length was statistically significant when compared with the two classic incisions, the 'S' and the inverted 'L' (P < 0.05). The difference in the comparison of KT-1000, Lysholm scores, International Knee joint Documentation Committee scores and posterior drawer test negative rate in pre-surgery and 3 months post-surgery were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The KT-1000 of the normal knee, the normal calf circumference, and the pre-surgery calf circumference were compared with the knee 3 months post-surgery, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Gastrocnemius strength in all patients was determined to be grade 5, which is normal strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study has shown that using POI to treat PCL tibial avulsion fractures is safe and effective, because it avoids nearby nerves and blood vessels. Therefore, I believe that the modified POI technique is worthy of being considered for use and has a great potential for application.</p>","PeriodicalId":19720,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_257_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified posteromedial oblique incision (POI) in the treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial avulsion fractures.

Methods: A single-centre, single-arm, prospective study. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were collected between September 2022 and June 2024 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. Patients were followed up to the study endpoint, and the safety and efficacy of the POI were inferred by analysing the follow-up data.

Results: The angle was 67.20 ± 3.16°, the |OM| was 2.48 ± 0.13 cm, the |ON| was 1.33 ± 0.12 cm. The incision length was statistically significant when compared with the two classic incisions, the 'S' and the inverted 'L' (P < 0.05). The difference in the comparison of KT-1000, Lysholm scores, International Knee joint Documentation Committee scores and posterior drawer test negative rate in pre-surgery and 3 months post-surgery were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The KT-1000 of the normal knee, the normal calf circumference, and the pre-surgery calf circumference were compared with the knee 3 months post-surgery, respectively, and the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Gastrocnemius strength in all patients was determined to be grade 5, which is normal strength.

Conclusion: The study has shown that using POI to treat PCL tibial avulsion fractures is safe and effective, because it avoids nearby nerves and blood vessels. Therefore, I believe that the modified POI technique is worthy of being considered for use and has a great potential for application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
A Study of Immunohistochemical Expression of p63 in Colorectal Carcinoma. Advancement in Microbiology Education: An Innovative Approach of Integrating Three-dimensional Holography Imaging Technology with Scanning Electron Microscopy. Clinical Efficacy of a Modified Posteromedial Oblique Incision in the Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fractures: A Single-centre, Single-arm, Prospective Study. Cross-sectional Study to Determine the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cytokeratin-19 Immunomarker in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Malignancy with Histopathology as Gold Standard. Determination of the Common Microorganisms Present in the Intensive Care Unit of Federal Teaching Hospital Owerri, Southeast Nigeria: A Prospective, Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1