{"title":"Predictive reward-prediction errors of climbing fiber inputs integrate modular reinforcement learning with supervised learning.","authors":"Huu Hoang, Shinichiro Tsutsumi, Masanori Matsuzaki, Masanobu Kano, Keisuke Toyama, Kazuo Kitamura, Mitsuo Kawato","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the cerebellum is typically associated with supervised learning algorithms, it also exhibits extensive involvement in reward processing. In this study, we investigated the cerebellum's role in executing reinforcement learning algorithms, with a particular emphasis on essential reward-prediction errors. We employed the Q-learning model to accurately reproduce the licking responses of mice in a Go/No-go auditory-discrimination task. This method enabled the calculation of reinforcement learning variables, such as reward, predicted reward, and reward-prediction errors in each learning trial. Through tensor component analysis of two-photon Ca2+ imaging data from more than 6,000 Purkinje cells, we found that climbing fiber inputs of the two distinct components, which were specifically activated during Go and No-go cues in the learning process, showed an inverse relationship with predictive reward-prediction errors. Assuming bidirectional parallel-fiber Purkinje-cell synaptic plasticity, we constructed a cerebellar neural-network model with 5,000 spiking neurons of granule cells, Purkinje cells, cerebellar nuclei neurons, and inferior olive neurons. The network model qualitatively reproduced distinct changes in licking behaviors, climbing-fiber firing rates, and their synchronization during discrimination learning separately for Go/No-go conditions. We found that Purkinje cells in the two components could develop specific motor commands for their respective auditory cues, guided by the predictive reward-prediction errors from their climbing fiber inputs. These results indicate a possible role of context-specific actors in modular reinforcement learning, integrating with cerebellar supervised learning capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"21 3","pages":"e1012899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the cerebellum is typically associated with supervised learning algorithms, it also exhibits extensive involvement in reward processing. In this study, we investigated the cerebellum's role in executing reinforcement learning algorithms, with a particular emphasis on essential reward-prediction errors. We employed the Q-learning model to accurately reproduce the licking responses of mice in a Go/No-go auditory-discrimination task. This method enabled the calculation of reinforcement learning variables, such as reward, predicted reward, and reward-prediction errors in each learning trial. Through tensor component analysis of two-photon Ca2+ imaging data from more than 6,000 Purkinje cells, we found that climbing fiber inputs of the two distinct components, which were specifically activated during Go and No-go cues in the learning process, showed an inverse relationship with predictive reward-prediction errors. Assuming bidirectional parallel-fiber Purkinje-cell synaptic plasticity, we constructed a cerebellar neural-network model with 5,000 spiking neurons of granule cells, Purkinje cells, cerebellar nuclei neurons, and inferior olive neurons. The network model qualitatively reproduced distinct changes in licking behaviors, climbing-fiber firing rates, and their synchronization during discrimination learning separately for Go/No-go conditions. We found that Purkinje cells in the two components could develop specific motor commands for their respective auditory cues, guided by the predictive reward-prediction errors from their climbing fiber inputs. These results indicate a possible role of context-specific actors in modular reinforcement learning, integrating with cerebellar supervised learning capabilities.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery.
Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines.
Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights.
Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology.
Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.