Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Surgical infections Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1089/sur.2024.285
Akira Shishido, Gregory Schrank, Alexander Vostal, Megan Uehling, Ravi Tripathi, Sai Chintalapati, Lauren Conway, Nikki Kus, Laura DiChiacchio, Marc Kai, Joseph A Kufera, Ronald Rabinowitz
{"title":"Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Akira Shishido, Gregory Schrank, Alexander Vostal, Megan Uehling, Ravi Tripathi, Sai Chintalapati, Lauren Conway, Nikki Kus, Laura DiChiacchio, Marc Kai, Joseph A Kufera, Ronald Rabinowitz","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive therapy for necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) that remains controversial due to lack of quality clinical evidence. This retrospective cohort examines the impact of HBOT on clinical outcomes from NSTI at a single center where evaluation for HBOT is standard of care. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted HBOT service and NSTI cases went without HBOT treatment, allowing for a comparison of treatment groups. The clinical outcomes of 253 patients with NSTI that were evaluated for HBOT were compared; 143 (56.3%) received HBOT and 110 (43.3%) did not. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Baseline characteristics were similar except for surface area of the wounds and distribution on the extremities. More patients in the non-HBOT group died within 90 days of admission than those in the HBOT group (5.8% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.015). Further, patients with large wounds (≥450 cm<sup>2</sup>) and those with high APACHE II scores (≥18) who underwent HBOT had significantly lower risk of death than patients who did not (odds ratio [OR] 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.72). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our study shows that there was a mortality benefit in patients with NSTI that was more significant in patients with large wounds and higher APACHE II scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":"384-389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an adjunctive therapy for necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) that remains controversial due to lack of quality clinical evidence. This retrospective cohort examines the impact of HBOT on clinical outcomes from NSTI at a single center where evaluation for HBOT is standard of care. Methods: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted HBOT service and NSTI cases went without HBOT treatment, allowing for a comparison of treatment groups. The clinical outcomes of 253 patients with NSTI that were evaluated for HBOT were compared; 143 (56.3%) received HBOT and 110 (43.3%) did not. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar except for surface area of the wounds and distribution on the extremities. More patients in the non-HBOT group died within 90 days of admission than those in the HBOT group (5.8% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.015). Further, patients with large wounds (≥450 cm2) and those with high APACHE II scores (≥18) who underwent HBOT had significantly lower risk of death than patients who did not (odds ratio [OR] 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.72). Conclusion: Our study shows that there was a mortality benefit in patients with NSTI that was more significant in patients with large wounds and higher APACHE II scores.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高压氧治疗坏死性软组织感染:临床结果的回顾性队列分析。
背景:高压氧治疗(HBOT)是一种治疗坏死性软组织感染(NSTIs)的辅助疗法,由于缺乏高质量的临床证据,仍然存在争议。该回顾性队列研究了HBOT对NSTI临床结果的影响,在单一中心,HBOT的评估是标准的护理。方法:COVID-19大流行中断了HBOT服务,NSTI病例未接受HBOT治疗,并进行治疗组比较。比较253例经HBOT评估的NSTI患者的临床结果;143例(56.3%)接受HBOT治疗,110例(43.3%)未接受。结果:除创面面积和四肢分布不同外,两组患者基线特征相似。非HBOT组患者入院后90天内死亡人数高于HBOT组(5.8% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.015)。此外,大伤口(≥450 cm2)和APACHE II评分高(≥18)的患者接受HBOT的死亡风险显著低于未接受HBOT的患者(优势比[OR] 0.12, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.02-0.72)。结论:我们的研究表明,创伤较大且APACHE II评分较高的NSTI患者的死亡率获益更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
期刊最新文献
Multi-Disciplinary and Protocol-Driven Post-Operative Care Reduces Incidence of Post-Sternotomy Mediastinitis. Letter: Syphilitic Granuloma: A Case Report. Letter: A Troublesome Beaded Chain: One End in the Stomach and the Other in the Jejunum. Letter: Can We Predict Nosocomial Infections Following Neonatal Repair of Digestive System Atresias? Implementation of an Emergency General Surgery Care Pathway for Acute Appendicitis: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1