{"title":"[New working time models-what is possible and how?]","authors":"B Nübel, P König, B Wullich, F Kunath, L Bellut","doi":"10.1007/s00120-025-02569-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workforce scheduling in healthcare faces significant challenges as overload, bureaucracy, and insufficient digitalization severely impact the satisfaction of physicians. In particular, the desire for a better work-life balance and more flexible working models is becoming increasingly important in order to retain skilled workers and to cope with the impending shortage of skilled workers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review article presents current working time models, their advantages and disadvantages, the legal basis, and some practical statements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze current studies and publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current challenges in healthcare present opportunities to enhance the attractiveness of medical professions, promote work-life balance, and secure the future of the medical profession through innovative work models such as part-time schedules, flexible hours, 4‑day workweeks, shift systems, time accounts, and hybrid working arrangements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While restructuring work hours offers opportunities to improve efficiency, employee satisfaction, and staff retention, it also entails risks such as increased organizational costs, implementation difficulties in day-to-day practice, and potential workload issues, making clear objectives, employee involvement, and technical support essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02569-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Workforce scheduling in healthcare faces significant challenges as overload, bureaucracy, and insufficient digitalization severely impact the satisfaction of physicians. In particular, the desire for a better work-life balance and more flexible working models is becoming increasingly important in order to retain skilled workers and to cope with the impending shortage of skilled workers.
Objectives: This review article presents current working time models, their advantages and disadvantages, the legal basis, and some practical statements.
Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze current studies and publications.
Results: Current challenges in healthcare present opportunities to enhance the attractiveness of medical professions, promote work-life balance, and secure the future of the medical profession through innovative work models such as part-time schedules, flexible hours, 4‑day workweeks, shift systems, time accounts, and hybrid working arrangements.
Conclusion: While restructuring work hours offers opportunities to improve efficiency, employee satisfaction, and staff retention, it also entails risks such as increased organizational costs, implementation difficulties in day-to-day practice, and potential workload issues, making clear objectives, employee involvement, and technical support essential.