[New working time models-what is possible and how?]

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urologie Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1007/s00120-025-02569-7
B Nübel, P König, B Wullich, F Kunath, L Bellut
{"title":"[New working time models-what is possible and how?]","authors":"B Nübel, P König, B Wullich, F Kunath, L Bellut","doi":"10.1007/s00120-025-02569-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workforce scheduling in healthcare faces significant challenges as overload, bureaucracy, and insufficient digitalization severely impact the satisfaction of physicians. In particular, the desire for a better work-life balance and more flexible working models is becoming increasingly important in order to retain skilled workers and to cope with the impending shortage of skilled workers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review article presents current working time models, their advantages and disadvantages, the legal basis, and some practical statements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze current studies and publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Current challenges in healthcare present opportunities to enhance the attractiveness of medical professions, promote work-life balance, and secure the future of the medical profession through innovative work models such as part-time schedules, flexible hours, 4‑day workweeks, shift systems, time accounts, and hybrid working arrangements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While restructuring work hours offers opportunities to improve efficiency, employee satisfaction, and staff retention, it also entails risks such as increased organizational costs, implementation difficulties in day-to-day practice, and potential workload issues, making clear objectives, employee involvement, and technical support essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02569-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Workforce scheduling in healthcare faces significant challenges as overload, bureaucracy, and insufficient digitalization severely impact the satisfaction of physicians. In particular, the desire for a better work-life balance and more flexible working models is becoming increasingly important in order to retain skilled workers and to cope with the impending shortage of skilled workers.

Objectives: This review article presents current working time models, their advantages and disadvantages, the legal basis, and some practical statements.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to analyze current studies and publications.

Results: Current challenges in healthcare present opportunities to enhance the attractiveness of medical professions, promote work-life balance, and secure the future of the medical profession through innovative work models such as part-time schedules, flexible hours, 4‑day workweeks, shift systems, time accounts, and hybrid working arrangements.

Conclusion: While restructuring work hours offers opportunities to improve efficiency, employee satisfaction, and staff retention, it also entails risks such as increased organizational costs, implementation difficulties in day-to-day practice, and potential workload issues, making clear objectives, employee involvement, and technical support essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[New working time models-what is possible and how?] [Innovative training concepts in urology]. [The sexual revolution and the rise of urologists in Germany]. [Association of glitazones and bladder cancer: a rapid review]. [We are obligated to exercise due diligence-but what does this look like in practice?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1