Avoidance of Major Vascular Injury in Transcranial Brain Tumor Surgery Using Real-Time Doppler Navigation: Technical Note and Case Series.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Operative Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1227/ons.0000000000001529
R Justin Garling, Regin Jay Mallari, Davendran Kanesen, Byron Hontiveros, Walavan Sivakumar, Daniel F Kelly, Garni Barkhoudarian
{"title":"Avoidance of Major Vascular Injury in Transcranial Brain Tumor Surgery Using Real-Time Doppler Navigation: Technical Note and Case Series.","authors":"R Justin Garling, Regin Jay Mallari, Davendran Kanesen, Byron Hontiveros, Walavan Sivakumar, Daniel F Kelly, Garni Barkhoudarian","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In endoscopic endonasal surgery, the Doppler probe has proven useful for localizing the paraclival and cavernous internal carotid arteries (ICA) and avoiding ICA injury. Similarly, during transcranial brain tumor removal, the Doppler probe may help avoid major vascular injury, particularly for tumors encasing or adherent to Circle of Willis branches. In this study, we describe the technique, outcomes, and potential neurovascular benefits of real-time navigation using the Doppler probe during craniotomy for brain tumor removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from 2015 to 2022 who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor resection and the Doppler probe was used were retrospectively analyzed. Data collection included demographics, tumor pathology, incidence of major/minor vascular injury, MRI-confirmed stroke/infarction, and extent of tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 695 patients underwent 840 craniotomies for brain tumor resection; in 501 craniotomies (59.6%), the Doppler was used. One major vascular injury (0.2%) of a supraclinoid ICA was directly attributed to non-Doppler probe use immediately before vessel injury, leading to stroke and severe neurological decline. There were 7 strokes (1.4%) leading to permanent neurological deficit attributable to vasospasm or small vessel injury and 26 asymptomatic infarctions/strokes (5.2%) attributable to unrecognized vascular injury or spasm at the time of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this series of 501 craniotomies for brain tumor removal where the Doppler probe was used, the rate of direct large vessel injury was under 1%. Although our data show that smaller vessel injuries can still occur and may lead to permanent neurological deficits, routine Doppler probe use may help guide tumor dissection and aggressiveness of removal, avoiding inadvertent major arterial injury. Our experience suggests that it is most useful as tumor dissection progresses as the resulting brain shift makes stereotactic neuronavigation less reliable. We recommend routine Doppler probe use during transcranial brain tumor removal, particularly for tumors encasing or adherent to major arteries.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"633-638"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: In endoscopic endonasal surgery, the Doppler probe has proven useful for localizing the paraclival and cavernous internal carotid arteries (ICA) and avoiding ICA injury. Similarly, during transcranial brain tumor removal, the Doppler probe may help avoid major vascular injury, particularly for tumors encasing or adherent to Circle of Willis branches. In this study, we describe the technique, outcomes, and potential neurovascular benefits of real-time navigation using the Doppler probe during craniotomy for brain tumor removal.

Methods: Patients from 2015 to 2022 who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor resection and the Doppler probe was used were retrospectively analyzed. Data collection included demographics, tumor pathology, incidence of major/minor vascular injury, MRI-confirmed stroke/infarction, and extent of tumor resection.

Results: In total, 695 patients underwent 840 craniotomies for brain tumor resection; in 501 craniotomies (59.6%), the Doppler was used. One major vascular injury (0.2%) of a supraclinoid ICA was directly attributed to non-Doppler probe use immediately before vessel injury, leading to stroke and severe neurological decline. There were 7 strokes (1.4%) leading to permanent neurological deficit attributable to vasospasm or small vessel injury and 26 asymptomatic infarctions/strokes (5.2%) attributable to unrecognized vascular injury or spasm at the time of surgery.

Conclusion: In this series of 501 craniotomies for brain tumor removal where the Doppler probe was used, the rate of direct large vessel injury was under 1%. Although our data show that smaller vessel injuries can still occur and may lead to permanent neurological deficits, routine Doppler probe use may help guide tumor dissection and aggressiveness of removal, avoiding inadvertent major arterial injury. Our experience suggests that it is most useful as tumor dissection progresses as the resulting brain shift makes stereotactic neuronavigation less reliable. We recommend routine Doppler probe use during transcranial brain tumor removal, particularly for tumors encasing or adherent to major arteries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用实时多普勒导航避免经颅脑肿瘤手术中的大血管损伤:技术说明和病例系列。
背景和目的:在鼻内窥镜手术中,多普勒探头已被证明可用于定位门旁动脉和海绵状颈内动脉(ICA)并避免ICA损伤。同样,在经颅脑肿瘤切除过程中,多普勒探头可以帮助避免大血管损伤,特别是对于包裹或附着于Willis分支圈的肿瘤。在这项研究中,我们描述了在脑肿瘤切除开颅术中使用多普勒探头实时导航的技术、结果和潜在的神经血管益处。方法:回顾性分析2015 ~ 2022年行颅脑肿瘤切除术并应用多普勒探头的患者。数据收集包括人口统计学、肿瘤病理、大/小血管损伤发生率、mri证实的脑卒中/梗死以及肿瘤切除程度。结果:695例患者行颅内肿瘤切除术840例;501例(59.6%)采用多普勒超声。一个主要的血管损伤(0.2%)直接归因于血管损伤前立即使用非多普勒探头,导致中风和严重的神经功能衰退。7例卒中(1.4%)由于血管痉挛或小血管损伤导致永久性神经功能缺损,26例无症状梗死/卒中(5.2%)由于手术时未识别的血管损伤或痉挛。结论:在本系列501例颅脑肿瘤切除术中,采用多普勒探头,直接大血管损伤率低于1%。尽管我们的数据显示小血管损伤仍然可能发生,并可能导致永久性神经功能缺损,但常规多普勒探头可能有助于指导肿瘤解剖和积极切除,避免意外的主要动脉损伤。我们的经验表明,随着肿瘤解剖的进展,立体定向神经导航变得不那么可靠,它是最有用的。我们建议在经颅脑肿瘤切除术中常规使用多普勒探头,特别是对于包裹或附着于大动脉的肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
期刊最新文献
Modified Posterior Petrosal Approach for Microsurgical Resection of a Retrochiasmatic Craniopharyngioma: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Anterior Temporal and Transcavernous Approach for Clipping of an Anterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysm: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Applicability of a Dexterity-Enhancing Handheld Robot for 360° Endoscopic Skull Base Approaches: An Exploratory Cadaver Study. Simulation of a Remote Robotic Endovascular Thrombectomy. Recurrent Large Vessel Occlusion After Successful Recanalization From Mechanical Thrombectomy: Risk Factors and Outcomes After Repeat Mechanical Thrombectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1