Soft tissue changes associated with Class III orthopaedic treatment in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 Dentistry Progress in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1186/s40510-025-00558-2
Ahmad Marwan Alhamwi, Ahmad Sharafeddin Burhan, Fehmieh Rafik Nawaya, Kinda Sultan
{"title":"Soft tissue changes associated with Class III orthopaedic treatment in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmad Marwan Alhamwi, Ahmad Sharafeddin Burhan, Fehmieh Rafik Nawaya, Kinda Sultan","doi":"10.1186/s40510-025-00558-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving a harmonious soft tissue profile and enhancing facial appearance are key goals of early treatment for skeletal class III malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarize the current evidence regarding the effects of Class III orthodontic treatment on facial soft tissues, and to compare various Class III orthodontic appliances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted up to July 2024, using seven databases, with no language restrictions. RCTs and controlled non-randomized studies were included in this systematic review. The GRADE framework was applied to evaluate the quality of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies were included in this review, of which sixteen were appropriate for quantitative synthesis. The age range fell between 6.6 and 12.3 years. The FM/RME protocol resulted in a 1.58 mm increase in upper lip protrusion and a 4.73-degree decrease in the nasolabial angle compared to the control group. Chincup treatment led to a 2.13 mm increase in upper lip protrusion and a 2.63 mm decrease in lower lip protrusion compared to the control group. The pooled estimate demonstrated a significant increase of 1.82 mm in upper lip protrusion, a significant retrusion of 3.14 mm in the lower lip, and a backward movement of the chin by 4.8 mm in patients treated with miniplate-anchored orthopaedic facemask (FM/MP) compared to the untreated group. However, no significant difference was found between FM/RME and FM/MP, except for a noticeable decrease in the nasolabial angle in the FM/RME group. The analysis of FM/Alt-RAMEC versus FM/RME did not reveal any difference in soft tissue outcomes, except for the upper lip protrusion. The Alt-RAMEC group showed a more pronounced anterior movement of the upper lip by 0.67 mm compared to the RME group. The quality of evidence supporting these findings ranged from low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low to moderate evidence suggesting that early treatment positively influences the soft tissues in Class III patients. However, these conclusions are based on a two-dimensional analysis of cephalometric images, which may not provide complete or accurate information. Therefore, more RCTs using comprehensive 3D analysis are needed to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO ( CRD42024517924 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":56071,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Orthodontics","volume":"26 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11911289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00558-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving a harmonious soft tissue profile and enhancing facial appearance are key goals of early treatment for skeletal class III malocclusion.

Aim: To summarize the current evidence regarding the effects of Class III orthodontic treatment on facial soft tissues, and to compare various Class III orthodontic appliances.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted up to July 2024, using seven databases, with no language restrictions. RCTs and controlled non-randomized studies were included in this systematic review. The GRADE framework was applied to evaluate the quality of evidence.

Results: Thirty studies were included in this review, of which sixteen were appropriate for quantitative synthesis. The age range fell between 6.6 and 12.3 years. The FM/RME protocol resulted in a 1.58 mm increase in upper lip protrusion and a 4.73-degree decrease in the nasolabial angle compared to the control group. Chincup treatment led to a 2.13 mm increase in upper lip protrusion and a 2.63 mm decrease in lower lip protrusion compared to the control group. The pooled estimate demonstrated a significant increase of 1.82 mm in upper lip protrusion, a significant retrusion of 3.14 mm in the lower lip, and a backward movement of the chin by 4.8 mm in patients treated with miniplate-anchored orthopaedic facemask (FM/MP) compared to the untreated group. However, no significant difference was found between FM/RME and FM/MP, except for a noticeable decrease in the nasolabial angle in the FM/RME group. The analysis of FM/Alt-RAMEC versus FM/RME did not reveal any difference in soft tissue outcomes, except for the upper lip protrusion. The Alt-RAMEC group showed a more pronounced anterior movement of the upper lip by 0.67 mm compared to the RME group. The quality of evidence supporting these findings ranged from low to moderate.

Conclusions: There is low to moderate evidence suggesting that early treatment positively influences the soft tissues in Class III patients. However, these conclusions are based on a two-dimensional analysis of cephalometric images, which may not provide complete or accurate information. Therefore, more RCTs using comprehensive 3D analysis are needed to confirm these results.

Registration: PROSPERO ( CRD42024517924 ).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Orthodontics
Progress in Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Orthodontics is a fully open access, international journal owned by the Italian Society of Orthodontics and published under the brand SpringerOpen. The Society is currently covering all publication costs so there are no article processing charges for authors. It is a premier journal of international scope that fosters orthodontic research, including both basic research and development of innovative clinical techniques, with an emphasis on the following areas: • Mechanisms to improve orthodontics • Clinical studies and control animal studies • Orthodontics and genetics, genomics • Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) control clinical trials • Efficacy of orthodontic appliances and animal models • Systematic reviews and meta analyses • Mechanisms to speed orthodontic treatment Progress in Orthodontics will consider for publication only meritorious and original contributions. These may be: • Original articles reporting the findings of clinical trials, clinically relevant basic scientific investigations, or novel therapeutic or diagnostic systems • Review articles on current topics • Articles on novel techniques and clinical tools • Articles of contemporary interest
期刊最新文献
Soft tissue changes associated with Class III orthopaedic treatment in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomechanical analysis of clear aligners for mandibular anterior teeth intrusion and its clinical application in the design of new aligner attachment. Skeletal versus conventional anchorage in dentofacial orthopedics: an international modified Delphi consensus study. Orthodontically induced root resorption in endodontically treated and vital teeth: a cone beam computer tomographic study. A novel PTH1R mutation causes primary failure of eruption via the cAMP-PI3K/AKT pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1