Reinforcement learning–based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management

IF 9.1 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1073/pnas.2402826122
Kairui Feng, Ning Lin, Robert E. Kopp, Siyuan Xian, Michael Oppenheimer
{"title":"Reinforcement learning–based adaptive strategies for climate change adaptation: An application for coastal flood risk management","authors":"Kairui Feng, Ning Lin, Robert E. Kopp, Siyuan Xian, Michael Oppenheimer","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2402826122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional computational models of climate adaptation frameworks inadequately consider decision-makers’ capacity to learn, update, and improve decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of reinforcement learning (RL), a machine learning technique that efficaciously acquires knowledge from the environment and systematically optimizes dynamic decisions, in modeling and informing adaptive climate decision-making. We consider coastal flood risk mitigations for Manhattan, New York City, USA (NYC), illustrating the benefit of continuously incorporating observations of sea-level rise into systematic designs of adaptive strategies. We find that when designing adaptive seawalls to protect NYC, the RL-derived strategy significantly reduces the expected net cost by 6 to 36% under the moderate emissions scenario SSP2-4.5 (9 to 77% under the high emissions scenario SSP5-8.5), compared to conventional methods. When considering multiple adaptive policies, including accomodation and retreat as well as protection, the RL approach leads to a further 5% (15%) cost reduction, showing RL’s flexibility in coordinatively addressing complex policy design problems. RL also outperforms conventional methods in controlling tail risk (i.e., low probability, high impact outcomes) and in avoiding losses induced by misinformation about the climate state (e.g., deep uncertainty), demonstrating the importance of systematic learning and updating in addressing extremes and uncertainties related to climate adaptation.","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402826122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional computational models of climate adaptation frameworks inadequately consider decision-makers’ capacity to learn, update, and improve decisions. Here, we investigate the potential of reinforcement learning (RL), a machine learning technique that efficaciously acquires knowledge from the environment and systematically optimizes dynamic decisions, in modeling and informing adaptive climate decision-making. We consider coastal flood risk mitigations for Manhattan, New York City, USA (NYC), illustrating the benefit of continuously incorporating observations of sea-level rise into systematic designs of adaptive strategies. We find that when designing adaptive seawalls to protect NYC, the RL-derived strategy significantly reduces the expected net cost by 6 to 36% under the moderate emissions scenario SSP2-4.5 (9 to 77% under the high emissions scenario SSP5-8.5), compared to conventional methods. When considering multiple adaptive policies, including accomodation and retreat as well as protection, the RL approach leads to a further 5% (15%) cost reduction, showing RL’s flexibility in coordinatively addressing complex policy design problems. RL also outperforms conventional methods in controlling tail risk (i.e., low probability, high impact outcomes) and in avoiding losses induced by misinformation about the climate state (e.g., deep uncertainty), demonstrating the importance of systematic learning and updating in addressing extremes and uncertainties related to climate adaptation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于强化学习的气候变化适应策略:在沿海洪水风险管理中的应用
气候适应框架的传统计算模型没有充分考虑决策者学习、更新和改进决策的能力。在这里,我们研究了强化学习(RL)在建模和为适应性气候决策提供信息方面的潜力。强化学习是一种机器学习技术,可以有效地从环境中获取知识并系统地优化动态决策。我们考虑了美国纽约市曼哈顿的沿海洪水风险缓解,说明了将海平面上升的观测持续纳入适应策略的系统设计的好处。我们发现,在设计适应性海堤以保护纽约市时,与传统方法相比,rl衍生策略在中等排放情景SSP2-4.5下显著降低了6 - 36%的预期净成本(在高排放情景SSP5-8.5下显著降低了9 - 77%的预期净成本)。在考虑多种适应性政策(包括住宿、撤退和保护)时,RL方法可进一步降低5%(15%)的成本,显示了RL在协调解决复杂政策设计问题方面的灵活性。强化学习在控制尾部风险(即低概率、高影响结果)和避免由气候状态错误信息(例如深度不确定性)引起的损失方面也优于传统方法,证明了系统学习和更新在解决与气候适应相关的极端和不确定性方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Computational design of an ultrapotent deltacoronavirus miniprotein inhibitor. Cellular responses to FGF1 are modulated by palmitoylation of the docking protein FRS2α. Context-dependent variability of HIF heterodimers influences interactions with macromolecular and small molecule partners. Cytochrome P450 1B1 directs pathogenic Th17 cell generation and autoimmune disease by fine-tuning redox homeostasis and mitochondrial integrity. Computational design of HLA class I superbinders for broad T cell immunogenicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1