Mapping the lived experience of rural substance use stigma: A conceptual framework of salient attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors in people who use drugs
Adams L. Sibley , Sophia M. Bartels , Seth M. Noar , Nisha Gottfredson O'Shea , Kathryn E. Muessig , William C. Miller , Vivian F. Go
{"title":"Mapping the lived experience of rural substance use stigma: A conceptual framework of salient attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors in people who use drugs","authors":"Adams L. Sibley , Sophia M. Bartels , Seth M. Noar , Nisha Gottfredson O'Shea , Kathryn E. Muessig , William C. Miller , Vivian F. Go","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Stigma directly contributes to physical, social, and psychic harm in people who use drugs. Current stigma frameworks privilege perspectives of stigmatizers, discounting the subjective lived experience of the stigmatized. Acknowledging that stigma is a universal phenomenon that manifests locally, we aimed to identify salient stigma-related attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and experiences among people who use drugs in the rural Appalachian region of the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-two people who use drugs residing in rural Ohio participated in qualitative interviews, sharing perspectives on and experiences with substance use stigma. Data were analyzed in three iterative rounds (using Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction, reflexive thematic analysis, in-vivo coding and analysis) then summarized in an experiential framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>We organize and describe three salient facets of rural substance use stigma shared by participants: manifestations (stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination), outcomes (immediate reactions and personal consequences), and responses (adaptive and maladaptive coping styles). We discuss how these experiences are situated in cultural context and may be shaped by values like family, community, and self-reliance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study provides a conceptual framework for understanding the lived experience of substance use stigma in one sociocultural context. This framework has immediate utility for informing stigma reduction efforts in rural Appalachia and may be adapted to other contexts where the local character of stigma is of theoretical or practical import.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"372 ","pages":"Article 117967"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625002977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Stigma directly contributes to physical, social, and psychic harm in people who use drugs. Current stigma frameworks privilege perspectives of stigmatizers, discounting the subjective lived experience of the stigmatized. Acknowledging that stigma is a universal phenomenon that manifests locally, we aimed to identify salient stigma-related attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and experiences among people who use drugs in the rural Appalachian region of the United States.
Methods
Twenty-two people who use drugs residing in rural Ohio participated in qualitative interviews, sharing perspectives on and experiences with substance use stigma. Data were analyzed in three iterative rounds (using Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction, reflexive thematic analysis, in-vivo coding and analysis) then summarized in an experiential framework.
Results and discussion
We organize and describe three salient facets of rural substance use stigma shared by participants: manifestations (stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination), outcomes (immediate reactions and personal consequences), and responses (adaptive and maladaptive coping styles). We discuss how these experiences are situated in cultural context and may be shaped by values like family, community, and self-reliance.
Conclusion
Our study provides a conceptual framework for understanding the lived experience of substance use stigma in one sociocultural context. This framework has immediate utility for informing stigma reduction efforts in rural Appalachia and may be adapted to other contexts where the local character of stigma is of theoretical or practical import.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.