Graph Model for Conflict Resolution Considering Heterogeneous Behavior Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Preference and Social Network Analysis

IF 8.6 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1109/TSMC.2024.3524795
Peng Wang;Yingxin Fu;Peide Liu
{"title":"Graph Model for Conflict Resolution Considering Heterogeneous Behavior Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Preference and Social Network Analysis","authors":"Peng Wang;Yingxin Fu;Peide Liu","doi":"10.1109/TSMC.2024.3524795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) is an effective tool to solve conflicts, which determines the feasible states by modeling the conflict, and then analyzes the behavior of decision-makers (DMs) through stability analysis to find a solution to the conflict. This article studies the composite DMs (CDMs) and the heterogeneous behaviors of opponents in GMCR. Based on the social relationship between DMs, the social network is applied to analyze the individuals in CDMs and to identify the types of heterogeneous behaviors of DMs. Combining social network and aggregating operator, this article unifies the preferences of individuals in a CDM. Subsequently, an identification mechanism is designed to determine the kind of opponents’ heterogeneous behaviors. Then, the mixed stabilities are extended to hesitant fuzzy mixed general meta-rationality (HFMGMR) and hesitant fuzzy mixed symmetric meta-rationality (HFMSMR). The matrix representations of two stabilities are developed to analyze the equilibrium of conflicts. Finally, a conflict in pollution rectification of industry enterprises is analyzed to demonstrate how social networks can be applied to GMCR with CDM and heterogeneous opponents. Hesitant fuzzy mixed stability analysis reveals the influence of heterogeneous behaviors in GMCR. Different types of DM behavior lead to different equilibrium results, which is concluded in this article.","PeriodicalId":48915,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","volume":"55 4","pages":"2644-2658"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10849994/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) is an effective tool to solve conflicts, which determines the feasible states by modeling the conflict, and then analyzes the behavior of decision-makers (DMs) through stability analysis to find a solution to the conflict. This article studies the composite DMs (CDMs) and the heterogeneous behaviors of opponents in GMCR. Based on the social relationship between DMs, the social network is applied to analyze the individuals in CDMs and to identify the types of heterogeneous behaviors of DMs. Combining social network and aggregating operator, this article unifies the preferences of individuals in a CDM. Subsequently, an identification mechanism is designed to determine the kind of opponents’ heterogeneous behaviors. Then, the mixed stabilities are extended to hesitant fuzzy mixed general meta-rationality (HFMGMR) and hesitant fuzzy mixed symmetric meta-rationality (HFMSMR). The matrix representations of two stabilities are developed to analyze the equilibrium of conflicts. Finally, a conflict in pollution rectification of industry enterprises is analyzed to demonstrate how social networks can be applied to GMCR with CDM and heterogeneous opponents. Hesitant fuzzy mixed stability analysis reveals the influence of heterogeneous behaviors in GMCR. Different types of DM behavior lead to different equilibrium results, which is concluded in this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
812
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems encompasses the fields of systems engineering, covering issue formulation, analysis, and modeling throughout the systems engineering lifecycle phases. It addresses decision-making, issue interpretation, systems management, processes, and various methods such as optimization, modeling, and simulation in the development and deployment of large systems.
期刊最新文献
Introducing IEEE Collabratec Table of Contents TechRxiv: Share Your Preprint Research With the World! IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems Publication Information IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems Information for Authors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1