Single-Tablet Combination Therapy of Macitentan/Tadalafil for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Qualitative Interview Study of the A DUE Phase 3 Trial.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s12325-025-03159-x
Fenling Fan, Stacy Davis, Claire Burbridge, Kelly Chin, Michael Friberg, Ekkehard Grünig, Melanie Hughes, Pavel Jansa, Jörg Linder, Jennifer Rafalski, Alvaro Agustin Rodriguez, Jason A Randall
{"title":"Single-Tablet Combination Therapy of Macitentan/Tadalafil for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Qualitative Interview Study of the A DUE Phase 3 Trial.","authors":"Fenling Fan, Stacy Davis, Claire Burbridge, Kelly Chin, Michael Friberg, Ekkehard Grünig, Melanie Hughes, Pavel Jansa, Jörg Linder, Jennifer Rafalski, Alvaro Agustin Rodriguez, Jason A Randall","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03159-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explored patient and clinician perspectives on a new fixed-dose combination of macitentan and tadalafil (M/T FDC) in a once-daily single tablet for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted during the open-label period of the global, phase 3 A DUE clinical trial that evaluated M/T FDC. A subset of enrolled patients (N = 26) and site investigators (N = 18 clinicians) were interviewed. Patients received four tablets during double-blind treatment and could be in one of three arms (macitentan + placebo; tadalafil + placebo; M/T FDC + placebo) followed by M/T FDC (one tablet) during the open-label period. Patients and clinicians were asked to share their experience of pre-trial PAH medication, double-blind treatment, and open-label M/T FDC. Thematic analysis was conducted on blinded data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients preferred the M/T FDC tablet (open-label) over the four tablets during double-blind treatment. Patients were satisfied with M/T FDC, highlighting its positive impact on their psychological well-being, through reducing stress associated with managing multiple pills. All patients indicated that having a single, once-a-day pill for PAH was more convenient and associated with greater treatment adherence. Clinicians highlighted that their patients have a high daily pill burden for PAH and other comorbidities, and prefer treatments with an oral mode of administration that reduce the number of daily pills required. Clinicians felt that M/T FDC would be well received in clinical practice and potentially assist in implementing guideline-recommended combination treatment of PAH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this qualitative analysis, all 26 patients and 18 clinicians provided positive feedback on M/T FDC treatment, which was consistent across countries. Reducing the number of pills needed to treat PAH, through use of single-tablet M/T FDC, is highly valued by patients and endorsed by clinicians, who both felt the single-tablet combination therapy could have a positive effect on patients' well-being and increase treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03159-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored patient and clinician perspectives on a new fixed-dose combination of macitentan and tadalafil (M/T FDC) in a once-daily single tablet for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted during the open-label period of the global, phase 3 A DUE clinical trial that evaluated M/T FDC. A subset of enrolled patients (N = 26) and site investigators (N = 18 clinicians) were interviewed. Patients received four tablets during double-blind treatment and could be in one of three arms (macitentan + placebo; tadalafil + placebo; M/T FDC + placebo) followed by M/T FDC (one tablet) during the open-label period. Patients and clinicians were asked to share their experience of pre-trial PAH medication, double-blind treatment, and open-label M/T FDC. Thematic analysis was conducted on blinded data.

Results: Patients preferred the M/T FDC tablet (open-label) over the four tablets during double-blind treatment. Patients were satisfied with M/T FDC, highlighting its positive impact on their psychological well-being, through reducing stress associated with managing multiple pills. All patients indicated that having a single, once-a-day pill for PAH was more convenient and associated with greater treatment adherence. Clinicians highlighted that their patients have a high daily pill burden for PAH and other comorbidities, and prefer treatments with an oral mode of administration that reduce the number of daily pills required. Clinicians felt that M/T FDC would be well received in clinical practice and potentially assist in implementing guideline-recommended combination treatment of PAH.

Conclusions: In this qualitative analysis, all 26 patients and 18 clinicians provided positive feedback on M/T FDC treatment, which was consistent across countries. Reducing the number of pills needed to treat PAH, through use of single-tablet M/T FDC, is highly valued by patients and endorsed by clinicians, who both felt the single-tablet combination therapy could have a positive effect on patients' well-being and increase treatment adherence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetic Comparability and Safety Between Original and Citrate-Free Mirikizumab Formulations for Subcutaneous Injections: Results from Three Clinical Trials. A Noninterventional, Cross-Sectional Study to Assess Patient Prostate Cancer Treatment Preferences and Experiences in Europe. A Real-World Study on the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: INTEGRATE Study. An Up-to-Date Description of the Use of Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Italy: Evidence from Real Clinical Practice. Prevention and Treatment of Intraoperative Complications During Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: Practical Tips and Tricks-A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1