Exploring pathways from intolerance of uncertainty to worry in adults with generalised anxiety disorder.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1080/16506073.2025.2478246
Emily J Wilson, Maree J Abbott, Alice R Norton, David Berle, Ronald M Rapee
{"title":"Exploring pathways from intolerance of uncertainty to worry in adults with generalised anxiety disorder.","authors":"Emily J Wilson, Maree J Abbott, Alice R Norton, David Berle, Ronald M Rapee","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2025.2478246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three decades of research indicate that intolerance of uncertainty (IU) plays a role in the maintenance of mental health conditions. In particular, the relationship between IU and worry is especially strong. The current study aimed to conduct a partial examination of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Model (IUM) of GAD as well as the Transdiagnostic Model of Intolerance of Uncertainty (TMIU), in a clinical sample of adults with GAD using path analysis. Participants with a primary diagnosis of GAD (<i>N</i> = 112) completed a range of measures that assessed IU, cognitive avoidance (CA), positive beliefs about worry (PBW), threat estimates, worry, and anxiety, with two path analysis models constructed for the IUM and TMIU. In a preliminary analysis of the IUM, path analysis found that CA and PBW did not have an indirect effect the relationship between IU and worry, however, CA (and not PBW) had an indirect effect on the relationship between IU and anxiety. For the TMIU, the first model demonstrated a poor fit. In an alternative model, threat estimates were found to indirect effect the relationship between IU and worry as well as anxiety. This suggests that threat appraisals do play a role in the relationship between IU, worry and anxiety in individuals with GAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"96-116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2025.2478246","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three decades of research indicate that intolerance of uncertainty (IU) plays a role in the maintenance of mental health conditions. In particular, the relationship between IU and worry is especially strong. The current study aimed to conduct a partial examination of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Model (IUM) of GAD as well as the Transdiagnostic Model of Intolerance of Uncertainty (TMIU), in a clinical sample of adults with GAD using path analysis. Participants with a primary diagnosis of GAD (N = 112) completed a range of measures that assessed IU, cognitive avoidance (CA), positive beliefs about worry (PBW), threat estimates, worry, and anxiety, with two path analysis models constructed for the IUM and TMIU. In a preliminary analysis of the IUM, path analysis found that CA and PBW did not have an indirect effect the relationship between IU and worry, however, CA (and not PBW) had an indirect effect on the relationship between IU and anxiety. For the TMIU, the first model demonstrated a poor fit. In an alternative model, threat estimates were found to indirect effect the relationship between IU and worry as well as anxiety. This suggests that threat appraisals do play a role in the relationship between IU, worry and anxiety in individuals with GAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索患有广泛性焦虑症的成年人从不耐烦不确定性到担忧的途径。
三十年的研究表明,不确定性不耐受(IU)在维持精神健康状况中起着重要作用。特别是,IU和担忧之间的关系尤为密切。目前的研究旨在对广泛性焦虑症的不确定性不耐受模型(IUM)和不确定性不耐受的诊断模型(TMIU)进行部分检查,在成人广泛性焦虑症的临床样本中使用通径分析。初步诊断为广泛性焦虑症的参与者(N = 112)完成了一系列评估IU、认知回避(CA)、对担忧的积极信念(PBW)、威胁估计、担忧和焦虑的测量,并为IUM和TMIU构建了两个路径分析模型。在对IUM的初步分析中,通径分析发现CA和PBW对IU与焦虑的关系没有间接影响,但是CA(而不是PBW)对IU与焦虑的关系有间接影响。对于TMIU,第一个模型的拟合性很差。在另一个模型中,威胁估计被发现间接影响IU与担忧和焦虑之间的关系。这表明,威胁评估确实在广泛性焦虑症患者的IU、担忧和焦虑之间的关系中发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
期刊最新文献
A pilot study of telehealth-delivered treatment for emotional disorders in a frontier community. Co-designed unguided internet cognitive behaviour therapy for grief in adolescence: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Modifying dysfunctional beliefs in social anxiety disorder with an emotion-focused approach-avoidance modification training - a feasibility study. Theoretic principles of rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) and loneliness: a multinational replication of Hyland et al. (2019). Negative effects of psychotherapy and their differential association with long-term outcome: an observational study of an intensive day treatment program for depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1