CT-based scores for extramural vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis correlate with gastric cancer survival.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11491-7
Qingwan Li, Zhaojuan Jiang, Yun Zhu, Siwei Lu, Jinqiu Ruan, Yanli Li, Keyu Mao, Jing Ai, Yongzhou Xu, YuTing Liao, Guangjun Yang, Yu Xie, Depei Gao, Yanni Huang, Zhenhui Li
{"title":"CT-based scores for extramural vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis correlate with gastric cancer survival.","authors":"Qingwan Li, Zhaojuan Jiang, Yun Zhu, Siwei Lu, Jinqiu Ruan, Yanli Li, Keyu Mao, Jing Ai, Yongzhou Xu, YuTing Liao, Guangjun Yang, Yu Xie, Depei Gao, Yanni Huang, Zhenhui Li","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11491-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of scoring extragastric vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the correlation between these scores and patient prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>587 GC patients with CT scans from two centers, all confirmed by pathology, were retrospectively evaluated. Scores for CT-detected blood vessel invasion (ctBVI), lymphatic invasion (ctLVI), and occult peritoneal metastasis (ctOPM) were assigned based on preoperative CT images. The patients' follow-up provided data on overall and disease-free survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-group and intra-group consistency of ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were all > 0.70. Log-rank analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival curves (p < 0.001). CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were related to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified ctBVL, ctLVI, ctOPM scores as independent risk factors for GC prognosis. In multivariate analysis, the three sign scores were related to DFS (p < 0.05), with ctBVL (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.980, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), ctLVI (HR = 1.502, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), and ctOPM (HR = 1.182, 95% CI: 0.886-1.578). The three scores were also correlated with OS (p < 0.05), ctBVL (HR = 2.003, 95% CI: 1.278-3.139), ctLVI (HR = 1.523, 95% CI:1.055-2.200) and ctOPM (HR = 1.289, 95% CI: 1.013-1.770).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores are valuable prognostic indicators in gastric cancer, influencing both OS and DFS.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question To study whether the ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores assessed by preoperative enhanced CT imaging can predict the survival outcomes of patients. Findings CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores, assessed via preoperative enhanced CT imaging, are associated with worse survival outcomes when elevated. Clinical relevance CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores may help guide personalized follow-up plans. Patients with higher scores might require closer monitoring and more aggressive treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"5733-5747"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11491-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of scoring extragastric vascular invasion and occult peritoneal metastasis using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of gastric cancer (GC) and to explore the correlation between these scores and patient prognosis.

Methods: 587 GC patients with CT scans from two centers, all confirmed by pathology, were retrospectively evaluated. Scores for CT-detected blood vessel invasion (ctBVI), lymphatic invasion (ctLVI), and occult peritoneal metastasis (ctOPM) were assigned based on preoperative CT images. The patients' follow-up provided data on overall and disease-free survival. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze prognostic factors.

Results: The inter-group and intra-group consistency of ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were all > 0.70. Log-rank analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in survival curves (p < 0.001). CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores were related to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified ctBVL, ctLVI, ctOPM scores as independent risk factors for GC prognosis. In multivariate analysis, the three sign scores were related to DFS (p < 0.05), with ctBVL (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.980, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), ctLVI (HR = 1.502, 95% CI: 1.336-2.933), and ctOPM (HR = 1.182, 95% CI: 0.886-1.578). The three scores were also correlated with OS (p < 0.05), ctBVL (HR = 2.003, 95% CI: 1.278-3.139), ctLVI (HR = 1.523, 95% CI:1.055-2.200) and ctOPM (HR = 1.289, 95% CI: 1.013-1.770).

Conclusion: CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores are valuable prognostic indicators in gastric cancer, influencing both OS and DFS.

Key points: Question To study whether the ctBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores assessed by preoperative enhanced CT imaging can predict the survival outcomes of patients. Findings CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores, assessed via preoperative enhanced CT imaging, are associated with worse survival outcomes when elevated. Clinical relevance CtBVL, ctLVI, and ctOPM scores may help guide personalized follow-up plans. Patients with higher scores might require closer monitoring and more aggressive treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 CT 的壁外血管侵犯和隐匿性腹膜转移评分与胃癌生存率相关。
目的:探讨利用胃癌(GC)术前CT (computed tomography, CT)图像对胃外血管侵犯及腹膜隐性转移进行评分的可行性,并探讨这些评分与患者预后的相关性。方法:回顾性分析两个中心587例经病理证实的胃癌患者的CT表现。根据术前CT图像对CT检测血管侵袭(ctBVI)、淋巴侵袭(ctLVI)和隐性腹膜转移(ctOPM)进行评分。患者的随访提供了总生存率和无病生存率的数据。采用Cox比例风险模型分析预后因素。结果:ctBVL、ctLVI、ctOPM评分组间、组内一致性均为0.70。Log-rank分析显示生存曲线差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:CtBVL、ctLVI、ctOPM评分是胃癌有价值的预后指标,影响OS和DFS。研究术前增强CT成像评估ctBVL、ctLVI、ctOPM评分是否能预测患者的生存结局。通过术前增强CT成像评估CtBVL, ctLVI和ctOPM评分,当升高时与较差的生存结果相关。CtBVL、ctLVI和ctOPM评分可能有助于指导个性化的随访计划。得分较高的患者可能需要更密切的监测和更积极的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Potential role of breast MRI to identify patients with high-risk lesions who might avoid surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expanding the boundaries: rethinking ablation coverage in focal therapy for prostate cancer. Optimizing prostate cancer treatment with MR-guided focused ultrasound: the role of expanded ablation-to-lesion volume ratio. Letter to the Editor: Early intervention in knee osteoarthritis with genicular artery embolization is associated with improved clinical outcomes. A new framework for pulmonary nodules: how terminology impacts management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1