Evaluation of successive DNA extractions from cotton and flocked swabs.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s12024-025-00960-6
Ella Pickell, Charlotte Arsenault, Kara L Jaremko, Georgiana Gibson-Daw, Deborah S B S Silva
{"title":"Evaluation of successive DNA extractions from cotton and flocked swabs.","authors":"Ella Pickell, Charlotte Arsenault, Kara L Jaremko, Georgiana Gibson-Daw, Deborah S B S Silva","doi":"10.1007/s12024-025-00960-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of swabs to collect biological samples is a current practice in forensic investigations. Once a sample is collected, the DNA is extracted and used for testing at the crime lab. DNA extraction can often be sub-optimal in yield, and identifying new approaches to obtain larger DNA quantities from casework samples is critical. The goal of this study was to investigate the success rate of obtaining sufficient DNA yields from previously extracted swabs. Reference and case-type samples were collected using different types of swabs and genomic DNA was extracted from samples multiple times using only the QIAamp<sup>®</sup> DNA Investigator Kit or using this kit in combination with the Investigator Lyse&Spin Basket Kit. DNA samples were amplified using the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit and separated on a SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer. All types of swabs and extraction methods yielded DNA after three extractions, and complete DNA profiles were produced for reference and case-type samples up to the third extraction. This provides a proof-of-concept that it is possible to recover DNA from previously extracted swabs in sufficient yield for full STR profiles. Also, trace DNA casework swabs can be extracted twice in succession and extracts pooled to increase yields for necessary DNA tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":12449,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1589-1593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-025-00960-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of swabs to collect biological samples is a current practice in forensic investigations. Once a sample is collected, the DNA is extracted and used for testing at the crime lab. DNA extraction can often be sub-optimal in yield, and identifying new approaches to obtain larger DNA quantities from casework samples is critical. The goal of this study was to investigate the success rate of obtaining sufficient DNA yields from previously extracted swabs. Reference and case-type samples were collected using different types of swabs and genomic DNA was extracted from samples multiple times using only the QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit or using this kit in combination with the Investigator Lyse&Spin Basket Kit. DNA samples were amplified using the GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit and separated on a SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer. All types of swabs and extraction methods yielded DNA after three extractions, and complete DNA profiles were produced for reference and case-type samples up to the third extraction. This provides a proof-of-concept that it is possible to recover DNA from previously extracted swabs in sufficient yield for full STR profiles. Also, trace DNA casework swabs can be extracted twice in succession and extracts pooled to increase yields for necessary DNA tests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棉签和蜂群拭子连续DNA提取的评价。
使用棉签收集生物样本是目前法医调查的一种做法。一旦样本被收集,DNA就会被提取出来,并在犯罪实验室进行测试。DNA提取在产量上往往不是最优的,从案例样本中找到获得更大量DNA的新方法至关重要。本研究的目的是调查从先前提取的拭子中获得足够DNA产量的成功率。使用不同类型的拭子收集参考和病例型样本,仅使用QIAamp®DNA调查员试剂盒或将该试剂盒与调查员Lyse&Spin Basket试剂盒联合使用,从样本中多次提取基因组DNA。DNA样本使用GlobalFiler™PCR扩增试剂盒扩增,并在SeqStudio遗传分析仪上分离。三次提取后,所有类型的拭子和提取方法均可获得DNA,并在第三次提取前生成完整的DNA图谱供参考和病例型样本使用。这提供了一个概念验证,即从先前提取的拭子中以足够的产量恢复DNA以获得完整的STR谱是可能的。此外,痕量DNA样本可以连续提取两次,并将提取液汇集在一起,以增加必要DNA测试的产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology MEDICINE, LEGAL-PATHOLOGY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology encompasses all aspects of modern day forensics, equally applying to children or adults, either living or the deceased. This includes forensic science, medicine, nursing, and pathology, as well as toxicology, human identification, mass disasters/mass war graves, profiling, imaging, policing, wound assessment, sexual assault, anthropology, archeology, forensic search, entomology, botany, biology, veterinary pathology, and DNA. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology presents a balance of forensic research and reviews from around the world to reflect modern advances through peer-reviewed papers, short communications, meeting proceedings and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Histologic features of Lange's folds: implications for diagnosing retinal folds due to vitreoretinal traction in pediatric eyes. Evaluation of DNA methylation-based age prediction accuracy in leukemia patients using a six-CpG model trained on healthy blood. From descriptive suspicion to decision-grade attribution in lethal hypothermia. Comment on "radiological evidence in legal contexts: forensic versus clinical reporting in cases involving living victims of violent crime". Neonatal endocarditis: from missed diagnosis to preventable pathway : Rao E, Annavarapu S. Enterococcus endocarditis in an infant with congenital renal duplex anomaly: a case report. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology (2026) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-026-01209-6.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1