Factors Associated With the Availability of Virtual Consultations in Primary Care Across 20 Countries: Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.2196/65147
Gabriele Kerr, Geva Greenfield, Edmond Li, Thomas Beaney, Benedict W J Hayhoe, Josip Car, Ana Clavería, Claire Collins, Gustavo Gusso, Robert D Hoffman, Geronimo Jimenez, Tuomas H Koskela, Liliana Laranjo, Heidrun Lingner, Ensieh Memarian, Katarzyna Nessler, Davorina Petek, Rosy Tsopra, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves
{"title":"Factors Associated With the Availability of Virtual Consultations in Primary Care Across 20 Countries: Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Gabriele Kerr, Geva Greenfield, Edmond Li, Thomas Beaney, Benedict W J Hayhoe, Josip Car, Ana Clavería, Claire Collins, Gustavo Gusso, Robert D Hoffman, Geronimo Jimenez, Tuomas H Koskela, Liliana Laranjo, Heidrun Lingner, Ensieh Memarian, Katarzyna Nessler, Davorina Petek, Rosy Tsopra, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves","doi":"10.2196/65147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Virtual consultations represent a notable change in health care delivery following the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the dynamics of virtual consultations is critical in assessing health care system resilience and adaptability in times of crisis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe the availability and hours of use of telephone, video, and human chat consultations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period, and identify factors associated with their availability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary care physicians (PCPs) from 20 upper-middle- and high-income countries completed a cross-sectional web-based survey in 2020. Factors associated with availability were investigated using chi-square tests and effect size (ES) estimates calculated using Cramer V.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1370 PCPs were included in this study (85.4% of the total sample of 1605). Telephone consultations were the most frequently available type of virtual consultations before and during the pandemic (73.1% and 90.4%, respectively). Significant increases in availability and use were observed during the pandemic for all the types of virtual consultations. The largest absolute increase in availability was observed for video consultations (39.5%), followed by telephone (17.3%) and chat (8.6%; all P<.001). The largest increase in use was observed for telephone consultations (+11 hours per week, P<.001). Digital maturity of the practice was weakly associated with availability of video consultations both before (ES 0.2) and during (ES 0.2) the pandemic (P<.001 for both), and with chat consultations before the pandemic only (ES 0.1, P=.001). Greater availability of video and chat consultations was found in PCPs who had completed digital health training, both before and during the pandemic (P<.001 for all). There was significant country-level variation in the use and availabilities of the technologies between both time periods. The association between country and the availability of telephone consultations changed from strong (ES 0.5, P<.001) to weak (ES 0.2, P=.03), while the relationship between country and video consultations changed from moderate (ES 0.3, P<.001) to strong (ES 0.5, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates the transformative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the availability of virtual consultations globally, and how practice-level factors, predominantly digital maturity, digital health training, and country, were associated with the availability of virtual consultations. Further exploration of drivers of availability, particularly at the national level, is needed to ensure sustained and effective implementation of virtual consultations.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.2196/30099.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e65147"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Virtual consultations represent a notable change in health care delivery following the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the dynamics of virtual consultations is critical in assessing health care system resilience and adaptability in times of crisis.

Objective: This study aimed to describe the availability and hours of use of telephone, video, and human chat consultations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic period, and identify factors associated with their availability.

Methods: Primary care physicians (PCPs) from 20 upper-middle- and high-income countries completed a cross-sectional web-based survey in 2020. Factors associated with availability were investigated using chi-square tests and effect size (ES) estimates calculated using Cramer V.

Results: A total of 1370 PCPs were included in this study (85.4% of the total sample of 1605). Telephone consultations were the most frequently available type of virtual consultations before and during the pandemic (73.1% and 90.4%, respectively). Significant increases in availability and use were observed during the pandemic for all the types of virtual consultations. The largest absolute increase in availability was observed for video consultations (39.5%), followed by telephone (17.3%) and chat (8.6%; all P<.001). The largest increase in use was observed for telephone consultations (+11 hours per week, P<.001). Digital maturity of the practice was weakly associated with availability of video consultations both before (ES 0.2) and during (ES 0.2) the pandemic (P<.001 for both), and with chat consultations before the pandemic only (ES 0.1, P=.001). Greater availability of video and chat consultations was found in PCPs who had completed digital health training, both before and during the pandemic (P<.001 for all). There was significant country-level variation in the use and availabilities of the technologies between both time periods. The association between country and the availability of telephone consultations changed from strong (ES 0.5, P<.001) to weak (ES 0.2, P=.03), while the relationship between country and video consultations changed from moderate (ES 0.3, P<.001) to strong (ES 0.5, P<.001).

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the transformative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the availability of virtual consultations globally, and how practice-level factors, predominantly digital maturity, digital health training, and country, were associated with the availability of virtual consultations. Further exploration of drivers of availability, particularly at the national level, is needed to ensure sustained and effective implementation of virtual consultations.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/30099.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与20个国家初级保健中虚拟咨询可用性相关的因素:横断面研究。
背景:虚拟会诊代表了COVID-19大流行后卫生保健服务的显著变化。了解虚拟咨询的动态对于评估卫生保健系统在危机时期的弹性和适应性至关重要。目的:本研究旨在描述在COVID-19大流行之前和期间电话、视频和人工聊天咨询的可用性和使用时间,并确定与其可用性相关的因素。方法:来自20个中高收入和高收入国家的初级保健医生(pcp)于2020年完成了一项基于网络的横断面调查。使用卡方检验和Cramer v计算的效应量(ES)估计来调查与可获得性相关的因素。结果:本研究共纳入1370个pcp(占总样本1605的85.4%)。电话咨询是大流行之前和期间最常用的虚拟咨询方式(分别为73.1%和90.4%)。在大流行期间,所有类型的虚拟咨询的可得性和使用情况都有显著增加。可获得性绝对增幅最大的是视频咨询(39.5%),其次是电话咨询(17.3%)和聊天咨询(8.6%;我们的研究证明了COVID-19大流行对全球虚拟咨询的可获得性的变革性影响,以及实践层面的因素(主要是数字成熟度、数字卫生培训和国家)如何与虚拟咨询的可获得性相关。需要进一步探索可获得性的驱动因素,特别是在国家一级,以确保持续和有效地执行虚拟协商。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.2196/30099。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Hospital-at-Home: New Technology Brings Acute Care to Patients' Homes. Detecting Uncoded Self-Harm in Veterans' Electronic Health Records Using Positive and Unlabeled Learning: Retrospective Observational Study. The Need for Continued Investment in Digital Pain Assessment. Long-Term Outcomes, Moderators, and Predictors in Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for People With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1