Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Treatment and Outcomes of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1061
Pratibha Shrestha, Ying Liu, James Struthers, Benjamin Kozower, Min Lian
{"title":"Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Treatment and Outcomes of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Pratibha Shrestha, Ying Liu, James Struthers, Benjamin Kozower, Min Lian","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Data on the impact of geographic access to cancer care on early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment and outcomes are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the associations of geographic access to cancer care with guideline-recommended treatment and outcomes in patients with early-stage NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This population-based cohort study included patients with early-stage NSCLC newly diagnosed between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, followed up through December 31, 2016, and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Data analysis was performed from March to November 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Geographic access to thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists was quantified using the 2-step floating catchment area algorithm and categorized into quintile 1 (least access) through quintile 5 (greatest access).</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Multilevel logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of receipt of surgery and radiotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) of lung cancer-specific mortality were estimated using Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 65 259 patients, the mean (SD) age was 69.4 (10.1) years; 33 114 patients (50.7%) were female, 1071 (1.6%) were uninsured, and 7541 (11.6%) were enrolled in Medicaid. The least (vs greatest) geographic access to thoracic surgeons (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; P < .001 for trend) and radiation oncologists (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P < .001 for trend) was associated with higher lung cancer mortality. Patients in counties with the least (vs greatest) access to thoracic surgeons were less likely to undergo surgery (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P < .001 for trend); this association was much stronger in Asian than non-Hispanic White patients and in Medicaid-insured than non-Medicaid-insured patients. Although there was no significant association overall, geographic access to radiation oncologists was significantly associated with radiotherapy use in older (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), Hispanic (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), and uninsured (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, geographic access to cancer care was associated with guideline-recommended treatment for early-stage NSCLC and outcomes, particularly in socially marginalized patients, underscoring the importance of ensuring appropriate geographic allocations of cancer care resources and addressing travel barriers to health care to improve NSCLC treatment, prognosis, and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"e251061"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1061","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Data on the impact of geographic access to cancer care on early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment and outcomes are limited.

Objective: To examine the associations of geographic access to cancer care with guideline-recommended treatment and outcomes in patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Design, setting, and participants: This population-based cohort study included patients with early-stage NSCLC newly diagnosed between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, followed up through December 31, 2016, and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Data analysis was performed from March to November 2024.

Exposures: Geographic access to thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists was quantified using the 2-step floating catchment area algorithm and categorized into quintile 1 (least access) through quintile 5 (greatest access).

Main outcomes and measures: Multilevel logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of receipt of surgery and radiotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) of lung cancer-specific mortality were estimated using Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard regression.

Results: Among 65 259 patients, the mean (SD) age was 69.4 (10.1) years; 33 114 patients (50.7%) were female, 1071 (1.6%) were uninsured, and 7541 (11.6%) were enrolled in Medicaid. The least (vs greatest) geographic access to thoracic surgeons (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; P < .001 for trend) and radiation oncologists (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P < .001 for trend) was associated with higher lung cancer mortality. Patients in counties with the least (vs greatest) access to thoracic surgeons were less likely to undergo surgery (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P < .001 for trend); this association was much stronger in Asian than non-Hispanic White patients and in Medicaid-insured than non-Medicaid-insured patients. Although there was no significant association overall, geographic access to radiation oncologists was significantly associated with radiotherapy use in older (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), Hispanic (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), and uninsured (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94) patients.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, geographic access to cancer care was associated with guideline-recommended treatment for early-stage NSCLC and outcomes, particularly in socially marginalized patients, underscoring the importance of ensuring appropriate geographic allocations of cancer care resources and addressing travel barriers to health care to improve NSCLC treatment, prognosis, and equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
A Virtual Cardiometabolic Health Program Among African Immigrants in the US: A Pilot Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. Barriers to Deprescribing Benzodiazepines in Older Adults in a Survey of European Physicians. Benefits of Patient-Clinician Communication for Timely Health Care Visits in Patients Perceiving Discrimination. Berberine Ursodeoxycholate for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Co-Occurrence of Stunting and Off-Track Early Child Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1