Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.
Diletta Corallino, Andrea Balla, Diego Coletta, Daniela Pacella, Mauro Podda, Annamaria Pronio, Monica Ortenzi, Francesca Ratti, Salvador Morales-Conde, Pierpaolo Sileri, Luca Aldrighetti
{"title":"Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.","authors":"Diletta Corallino, Andrea Balla, Diego Coletta, Daniela Pacella, Mauro Podda, Annamaria Pronio, Monica Ortenzi, Francesca Ratti, Salvador Morales-Conde, Pierpaolo Sileri, Luca Aldrighetti","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a dreaded complication. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been introduced in surgery. This systematic review aims to investigate whether AI can guide surgeons in identifying anatomical structures to facilitate safer dissection during LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42023478754, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2304 articles identified, twenty-five were included in the analysis. The mean average precision for biliary structures detection reported in the included studies reaches 98%. The mean intersection over union ranges from 0.5 to 0.7, and the mean Dice/F1 spatial correlation index was greater than 0.7/1. AI system provided a change in the annotations in 27% of the cases, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The contribution to preventing BDI was reported at 3.65/4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although studies on the use of AI during LC are few and very heterogeneous, AI has the potential to identify anatomical structures, thereby guiding surgeons towards safer LC procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a dreaded complication. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been introduced in surgery. This systematic review aims to investigate whether AI can guide surgeons in identifying anatomical structures to facilitate safer dissection during LC.
Methods: Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42023478754, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted.
Results: Out of 2304 articles identified, twenty-five were included in the analysis. The mean average precision for biliary structures detection reported in the included studies reaches 98%. The mean intersection over union ranges from 0.5 to 0.7, and the mean Dice/F1 spatial correlation index was greater than 0.7/1. AI system provided a change in the annotations in 27% of the cases, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The contribution to preventing BDI was reported at 3.65/4.
Conclusions: Although studies on the use of AI during LC are few and very heterogeneous, AI has the potential to identify anatomical structures, thereby guiding surgeons towards safer LC procedures.
期刊介绍:
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.