Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6
Diletta Corallino, Andrea Balla, Diego Coletta, Daniela Pacella, Mauro Podda, Annamaria Pronio, Monica Ortenzi, Francesca Ratti, Salvador Morales-Conde, Pierpaolo Sileri, Luca Aldrighetti
{"title":"Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.","authors":"Diletta Corallino, Andrea Balla, Diego Coletta, Daniela Pacella, Mauro Podda, Annamaria Pronio, Monica Ortenzi, Francesca Ratti, Salvador Morales-Conde, Pierpaolo Sileri, Luca Aldrighetti","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a dreaded complication. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been introduced in surgery. This systematic review aims to investigate whether AI can guide surgeons in identifying anatomical structures to facilitate safer dissection during LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42023478754, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2304 articles identified, twenty-five were included in the analysis. The mean average precision for biliary structures detection reported in the included studies reaches 98%. The mean intersection over union ranges from 0.5 to 0.7, and the mean Dice/F1 spatial correlation index was greater than 0.7/1. AI system provided a change in the annotations in 27% of the cases, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The contribution to preventing BDI was reported at 3.65/4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although studies on the use of AI during LC are few and very heterogeneous, AI has the potential to identify anatomical structures, thereby guiding surgeons towards safer LC procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a dreaded complication. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been introduced in surgery. This systematic review aims to investigate whether AI can guide surgeons in identifying anatomical structures to facilitate safer dissection during LC.

Methods: Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42023478754, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted.

Results: Out of 2304 articles identified, twenty-five were included in the analysis. The mean average precision for biliary structures detection reported in the included studies reaches 98%. The mean intersection over union ranges from 0.5 to 0.7, and the mean Dice/F1 spatial correlation index was greater than 0.7/1. AI system provided a change in the annotations in 27% of the cases, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The contribution to preventing BDI was reported at 3.65/4.

Conclusions: Although studies on the use of AI during LC are few and very heterogeneous, AI has the potential to identify anatomical structures, thereby guiding surgeons towards safer LC procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用人工智能识别解剖结构的系统综述:一种面向未来的工具。
目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中胆管损伤(BDI)是一种可怕的并发症。人工智能(AI)最近被引入到外科手术中。本系统综述旨在探讨人工智能是否可以指导外科医生识别解剖结构,以促进LC中更安全的解剖。方法:按照PROSPERO注册编号CRD-42023478754,对MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、EMBASE和Web of Science数据库进行符合PRISMA标准的系统评价和meta分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)系统搜索。结果:在鉴定的2304篇文章中,有25篇被纳入分析。在纳入的研究中,胆道结构检测的平均精度达到98%。交汇的均值在0.5 ~ 0.7之间,Dice/F1空间相关指数均值大于0.7/1。人工智能系统在27%的情况下对注释进行了更改,其中70%的更改被认为是更安全的更改。预防BDI的贡献为3.65/4。结论:尽管关于人工智能在LC中的应用的研究很少,而且非常多样化,但人工智能具有识别解剖结构的潜力,从而指导外科医生采取更安全的LC手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Simulation unlocked: transforming thyroid surgery training through high-fidelity and curriculum-based innovation-a systematic review. Changes in psoas muscle area in patients with colorectal cancer three years after surgery: a longitudinal approach. Correction to: Risk and protective factors for anastomotic insufficiency in elective colon and rectal cancer resections - a multivariate analysis with over 700 patients. Current German practices in the prevention and management of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a nationwide survey. Outcomes of patients with rectal cancer and pathological complete response as well as patients with tumor cell dedifferentiation. Two prognostic different groups of patients responding to pre-operative oncological therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1