Gang Wang, Yi Xie, XiaRui Bai, Yuming Zhang, Jiao Guo
{"title":"Development and validation comparison of multiple models for perioperative neurocognitive disorders during hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Gang Wang, Yi Xie, XiaRui Bai, Yuming Zhang, Jiao Guo","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-93324-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to develop optimal predictive models for perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) in hip arthroplasty patients, thereby advancing clinical practice. Data from all hip arthroplasty patients in the MIMIC-IV database were utilized to predict PND. With 62 variables, we applied multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network (ANN), Naive Bayes, support vector machine, and decision tree (XgBoost) algorithms to forecast PND. Feature analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve plotting, and sensitivity, specificity, and F-measure β = 1 (F1-score) assessments were conducted on both training and validation sets for classifying models' effectiveness. Brier score and Index of prediction accuracy (IPA) were employed to compare prediction capabilities in both sets. Among 3,292 hip arthroplasty patients in the MIMIC database, 331 developed PND. Five models using different algorithms were constructed. After thorough comparison and validation, the ANN model emerged as the most effective model. Performance metrics on the training set for the ANN model were: ROC: 0.954, Accuracy: 0.938, Precision: 0.758, F1-score: 0.657, Brier Score: 0.048, IPA: 90.8%. On the validation set, the ANN model performed as follows: ROC: 0.857, Accuracy: 0.903, Precision: 0.539, F1-score: 0.432, Brier Score: 0.071, IPA: 71.4%. An online visualization tool was developed ( https://xyyy.pythonanywhere.com/ ).</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"9393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-93324-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to develop optimal predictive models for perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) in hip arthroplasty patients, thereby advancing clinical practice. Data from all hip arthroplasty patients in the MIMIC-IV database were utilized to predict PND. With 62 variables, we applied multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network (ANN), Naive Bayes, support vector machine, and decision tree (XgBoost) algorithms to forecast PND. Feature analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve plotting, and sensitivity, specificity, and F-measure β = 1 (F1-score) assessments were conducted on both training and validation sets for classifying models' effectiveness. Brier score and Index of prediction accuracy (IPA) were employed to compare prediction capabilities in both sets. Among 3,292 hip arthroplasty patients in the MIMIC database, 331 developed PND. Five models using different algorithms were constructed. After thorough comparison and validation, the ANN model emerged as the most effective model. Performance metrics on the training set for the ANN model were: ROC: 0.954, Accuracy: 0.938, Precision: 0.758, F1-score: 0.657, Brier Score: 0.048, IPA: 90.8%. On the validation set, the ANN model performed as follows: ROC: 0.857, Accuracy: 0.903, Precision: 0.539, F1-score: 0.432, Brier Score: 0.071, IPA: 71.4%. An online visualization tool was developed ( https://xyyy.pythonanywhere.com/ ).
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.