Lena Spangenberg, Heide Glaesmer, Nina Hallensleben, Dajana Schreiber, Thomas Forkmann, Aleksa Kaurin
{"title":"Exploring Predictors of Passive Versus Active Suicidal Ideation.","authors":"Lena Spangenberg, Heide Glaesmer, Nina Hallensleben, Dajana Schreiber, Thomas Forkmann, Aleksa Kaurin","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Passive and active suicidal ideation (SI) have been shown to be co-occurring but are distinguishable constructs with presumably differential sets of predictors. <i>Aims:</i> The present analysis integrates nomothetic and idiographic analyses to unravel the relations between passive and active SI and momentary affective states in real-time data to tap several knowledge gaps. <i>Methods:</i> 54 psychiatric inpatients rated their current passive and active SI and positive as well as negative affect for six consecutive days (10 random prompts daily) using ecological momentary assessments on smartphones. Data were analyzed using group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME). <i>Results:</i> On subgroup level, only significant contemporaneous paths emerged (with no direct paths from affect to active SI). In general, the personalized models revealed large heterogeneity. The number, direction, and strengths of individual paths differed enormously (with fewer direct paths from affect to active SI than to passive SI overall). Passive and active SI were interrelated in the majority of individual models. <i>Limitations</i>: Findings are limited by item wording, co-occurence of passive and active SI, and the short observation interval. <i>Conclusion:</i> The heterogeneous individual models potentially reflect structural and functional differences in the development and maintenance of SI.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Passive and active suicidal ideation (SI) have been shown to be co-occurring but are distinguishable constructs with presumably differential sets of predictors. Aims: The present analysis integrates nomothetic and idiographic analyses to unravel the relations between passive and active SI and momentary affective states in real-time data to tap several knowledge gaps. Methods: 54 psychiatric inpatients rated their current passive and active SI and positive as well as negative affect for six consecutive days (10 random prompts daily) using ecological momentary assessments on smartphones. Data were analyzed using group iterative multiple model estimation (GIMME). Results: On subgroup level, only significant contemporaneous paths emerged (with no direct paths from affect to active SI). In general, the personalized models revealed large heterogeneity. The number, direction, and strengths of individual paths differed enormously (with fewer direct paths from affect to active SI than to passive SI overall). Passive and active SI were interrelated in the majority of individual models. Limitations: Findings are limited by item wording, co-occurence of passive and active SI, and the short observation interval. Conclusion: The heterogeneous individual models potentially reflect structural and functional differences in the development and maintenance of SI.
背景:被动和主动自杀意念(SI)已被证明是同时存在的,但这两种意念是有区别的,其预测因素也可能不同。目的:本分析综合了提名分析和成因分析,以揭示实时数据中被动和主动自杀意念与瞬间情感状态之间的关系,从而填补一些知识空白。方法:54 名精神病住院患者连续六天(每天 10 次随机提示)使用智能手机上的生态瞬间评估对其当前的被动和主动 SI 以及积极和消极情绪进行评分。数据采用群体迭代多重模型估计法(GIMME)进行分析。结果显示在亚组层面上,只出现了显著的同期路径(没有从情绪到主动 SI 的直接路径)。总体而言,个性化模型显示出很大的异质性。单个路径的数量、方向和强度存在巨大差异(从情感到主动 SI 的直接路径少于被动 SI 的整体路径)。在大多数个性化模型中,被动和主动 SI 是相互关联的。局限性:研究结果受限于项目措辞、被动和主动 SI 的共存以及较短的观察间隔。结论:不同的个体模型可能反映了 SI 在发展和维持过程中的结构和功能差异。
期刊介绍:
A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.