Is It a Bribe? Research Personnels' Perceptions of the Ethical Aspects of Financial Compensation to Healthy Volunteers in Prevention Trials in Tanzania.

Q1 Arts and Humanities AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2025.2474910
Raymond Athanas, Gasto Frumence, Rebecca J DeBoer, Connie M Ulrich
{"title":"Is It a Bribe? Research Personnels' Perceptions of the Ethical Aspects of Financial Compensation to Healthy Volunteers in Prevention Trials in Tanzania.","authors":"Raymond Athanas, Gasto Frumence, Rebecca J DeBoer, Connie M Ulrich","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2025.2474910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Financial compensation may be perceived as a catalyst to increase the recruitment and retention of healthy volunteers in clinical trials but also potentially as a form of undue inducement. The ethical guidelines in Tanzania, while helpful, are not clear on what is considered reasonable compensation for healthy volunteers and the extent to which it influences participation. This study aimed to explore research personnels' perceptions of the ethical aspects of financial compensation to healthy volunteers participating in prevention trials in Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted in Tanzania with a purposive sample of 36 research personnel with different project roles ranging from principal investigators (PIs) to study staff on six prevention trials. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most research personnel were physicians (64%) and male (67%) with a mean age of 48 years. Three qualitative themes were identified: ethical justifications for financial compensation, ethical concerns about financial compensation and fair compensation as income. Most Tanzanian research personnel were more aligned with the view that financial compensation is an ethical responsibility in respecting the value of a healthy volunteer's time and effort, especially for those who face barriers to participation, rather than being a bribe. However, there were those who raised ethical concerns about financial compensation that included perceptions of bribing low-income earners and increased misperceptions of trial activities. Research personnel also indicated that the specific amount of financial compensation has ethical implications. Amounts that were either too much or too little were viewed as unethical, whereas a modest rate was perceived as ethical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paying healthy volunteers is a measure of respect and supported by the national Tanzanian research guidelines. However, a reevaluation of these research ethical guidelines to redefine reasonable, fair and just financial compensation, especially for those who face significant barriers to participation, would continue to respect healthy volunteers and provide regional guidance for researchers within the country.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2025.2474910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Financial compensation may be perceived as a catalyst to increase the recruitment and retention of healthy volunteers in clinical trials but also potentially as a form of undue inducement. The ethical guidelines in Tanzania, while helpful, are not clear on what is considered reasonable compensation for healthy volunteers and the extent to which it influences participation. This study aimed to explore research personnels' perceptions of the ethical aspects of financial compensation to healthy volunteers participating in prevention trials in Tanzania.

Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted in Tanzania with a purposive sample of 36 research personnel with different project roles ranging from principal investigators (PIs) to study staff on six prevention trials. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was performed.

Results: Most research personnel were physicians (64%) and male (67%) with a mean age of 48 years. Three qualitative themes were identified: ethical justifications for financial compensation, ethical concerns about financial compensation and fair compensation as income. Most Tanzanian research personnel were more aligned with the view that financial compensation is an ethical responsibility in respecting the value of a healthy volunteer's time and effort, especially for those who face barriers to participation, rather than being a bribe. However, there were those who raised ethical concerns about financial compensation that included perceptions of bribing low-income earners and increased misperceptions of trial activities. Research personnel also indicated that the specific amount of financial compensation has ethical implications. Amounts that were either too much or too little were viewed as unethical, whereas a modest rate was perceived as ethical.

Conclusions: Paying healthy volunteers is a measure of respect and supported by the national Tanzanian research guidelines. However, a reevaluation of these research ethical guidelines to redefine reasonable, fair and just financial compensation, especially for those who face significant barriers to participation, would continue to respect healthy volunteers and provide regional guidance for researchers within the country.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:经济补偿可能会被视为临床试验招募和留住健康志愿者的催化剂,但也有可能被视为一种不当诱导。坦桑尼亚的伦理指南虽然有所帮助,但并没有明确规定什么是对健康志愿者的合理补偿,以及这种补偿在多大程度上会影响志愿者的参与。本研究旨在探讨研究人员对向参与坦桑尼亚预防试验的健康志愿者提供经济补偿的伦理问题的看法:在坦桑尼亚对 36 名研究人员进行了定性半结构式访谈,这些研究人员具有不同的项目角色,从主要研究人员(PI)到六项预防试验的研究人员。对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录,并进行了主题分析:大多数研究人员为医生(64%)和男性(67%),平均年龄为 48 岁。确定了三个定性主题:经济补偿的道德理由、对经济补偿的道德担忧和作为收入的公平补偿。大多数坦桑尼亚研究人员更赞同这样的观点,即经济补偿是一种道德责任,是对健康志愿者的时间和精力价值的尊重,尤其是对那些面临参与障碍的志愿者而言,而不是一种贿赂。不过,也有人对经济补偿提出了道德方面的担忧,包括认为会贿赂低收入者和增加对试验活动的误解。研究人员还表示,经济补偿的具体金额也会产生道德影响。金额过高或过低都被认为是不道德的,而适度的金额则被认为是道德的:结论:向健康的志愿者支付报酬是对他们的尊重,也得到了坦桑尼亚国家研究指南的支持。然而,重新评估这些研究伦理指南,重新定义合理、公平和公正的经济补偿,尤其是对那些面临重大参与障碍的志愿者的补偿,将继续尊重健康志愿者,并为该国的研究人员提供地区指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
'Why Do You Ask?' Revisiting the Purpose of Eliciting the Public's Moral Judgments About Emerging Technologies. 'An Unimaginable Challenge': A Cross-Cultural Qualitative Study of Ethics and Decision-Making Around Tracheostomy Ventilation in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Is It a Bribe? Research Personnels' Perceptions of the Ethical Aspects of Financial Compensation to Healthy Volunteers in Prevention Trials in Tanzania. Family Presence in Pediatric Cardiac Procedural Settings: A Qualitative Study of Clinicians, A Key Stakeholder Group. The Emotional Impact of Clinical Ethics Work on Clinical Ethicists: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1