Barriers to cervical cancer screening among refugee women: A systematic review.

IF 2.5 PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004225
Md Anwer Hossain, Shimlin Jahan Khanam, Md Nuruzzaman Khan, John Oldroyd, Rakibul M Islam
{"title":"Barriers to cervical cancer screening among refugee women: A systematic review.","authors":"Md Anwer Hossain, Shimlin Jahan Khanam, Md Nuruzzaman Khan, John Oldroyd, Rakibul M Islam","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer disproportionately affects vulnerable populations including refugee women. Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake in this group is crucial to inform targeted interventions and improve health outcomes. This review aimed to identify barriers hindering their access to cervical cancer screening. Five databases - Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS - were searched in December 2024. The inclusion criteria included studies - a) targeting healthy refugee women, b) conducted in community or hospital/clinic settings, c) reporting barriers to cervical cancer screening from the women's perspective, and d) published in English. Thematic analysis was performed to identify the barriers. The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eleven studies, seven from the USA, one from each of the UK, Australia, South Korea and Jordan, were included in this review. Of these, six were qualitative, three were quantitative and two were mixed methods studies. There was a consistent pattern of lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and cancer screening in refugee women. A unique barrier was women's negative experiences in refugee camps. Four interconnected themes emerged including 1) individual level barriers, 2) cultural and religious barriers, 3) social and structural barriers, and 4) healthcare system barriers. Ninety percent of included studies were assessed as medium or high quality. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to address the diverse challenges faced by refugee women globally which hinder their access to cervical cancer screening. Strategies should include culturally sensitive awareness campaigns, active engagement of healthcare professionals, and structural reforms within healthcare systems to enhance cervical cancer screening uptake among refugee women.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 3","pages":"e0004225"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cervical cancer disproportionately affects vulnerable populations including refugee women. Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake in this group is crucial to inform targeted interventions and improve health outcomes. This review aimed to identify barriers hindering their access to cervical cancer screening. Five databases - Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS - were searched in December 2024. The inclusion criteria included studies - a) targeting healthy refugee women, b) conducted in community or hospital/clinic settings, c) reporting barriers to cervical cancer screening from the women's perspective, and d) published in English. Thematic analysis was performed to identify the barriers. The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eleven studies, seven from the USA, one from each of the UK, Australia, South Korea and Jordan, were included in this review. Of these, six were qualitative, three were quantitative and two were mixed methods studies. There was a consistent pattern of lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and cancer screening in refugee women. A unique barrier was women's negative experiences in refugee camps. Four interconnected themes emerged including 1) individual level barriers, 2) cultural and religious barriers, 3) social and structural barriers, and 4) healthcare system barriers. Ninety percent of included studies were assessed as medium or high quality. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to address the diverse challenges faced by refugee women globally which hinder their access to cervical cancer screening. Strategies should include culturally sensitive awareness campaigns, active engagement of healthcare professionals, and structural reforms within healthcare systems to enhance cervical cancer screening uptake among refugee women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
难民妇女宫颈癌筛查的障碍:一项系统综述。
子宫颈癌对包括难民妇女在内的弱势群体的影响尤为严重。了解这一群体接受宫颈癌筛查的障碍对于告知有针对性的干预措施和改善健康结果至关重要。本综述旨在确定阻碍她们获得宫颈癌筛查的障碍。在2024年12月检索了五个数据库- Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL和SCOPUS。纳入标准包括以下研究:a)以健康的难民妇女为对象,b)在社区或医院/诊所环境中进行,c)从妇女的角度报告宫颈癌筛查的障碍,d)以英文发表。进行专题分析以确定障碍。该评价遵循更新的系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。本综述纳入了11项研究,其中7项来自美国,英国、澳大利亚、韩国和约旦各1项。其中6项为定性研究,3项为定量研究,2项为混合方法研究。难民妇女一直缺乏对宫颈癌和癌症筛查的知识。一个独特的障碍是妇女在难民营的负面经历。出现了四个相互关联的主题,包括1)个人层面的障碍,2)文化和宗教障碍,3)社会和结构障碍,以及4)医疗保健系统障碍。90%的纳入研究被评估为中等或高质量。调查结果强调,迫切需要有针对性的干预措施,以解决全球难民妇女面临的各种挑战,这些挑战阻碍了她们获得宫颈癌筛查。战略应包括文化敏感的意识运动,保健专业人员的积极参与,以及保健系统内的结构性改革,以提高难民妇女对宫颈癌筛查的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Awareness of anthrax disease and the knowledge of its transmission and symtoms identification: A cross sectional study among butchers in ile-ife. Community experiences of the impacts of climate-induced extreme weather events in Uganda: A qualitative study. Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Geriatric Depression Scale - Short Form into Bengali among elderly people in Bangladesh. Establishing an empirical cut-off on the 12-item Brief Berger HIV Stigma Scale to screen psychosocial vulnerability among PLHIV in Nigeria. Spatiotemporal patterns and entomological predictors of dengue transmission in Urban Surat, India (2016-2020): A surveillance-based risk modelling study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1