Barriers to cervical cancer screening among refugee women: A systematic review.

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004225
Md Anwer Hossain, Shimlin Jahan Khanam, Md Nuruzzaman Khan, John Oldroyd, Rakibul M Islam
{"title":"Barriers to cervical cancer screening among refugee women: A systematic review.","authors":"Md Anwer Hossain, Shimlin Jahan Khanam, Md Nuruzzaman Khan, John Oldroyd, Rakibul M Islam","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer disproportionately affects vulnerable populations including refugee women. Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake in this group is crucial to inform targeted interventions and improve health outcomes. This review aimed to identify barriers hindering their access to cervical cancer screening. Five databases - Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS - were searched in December 2024. The inclusion criteria included studies - a) targeting healthy refugee women, b) conducted in community or hospital/clinic settings, c) reporting barriers to cervical cancer screening from the women's perspective, and d) published in English. Thematic analysis was performed to identify the barriers. The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eleven studies, seven from the USA, one from each of the UK, Australia, South Korea and Jordan, were included in this review. Of these, six were qualitative, three were quantitative and two were mixed methods studies. There was a consistent pattern of lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and cancer screening in refugee women. A unique barrier was women's negative experiences in refugee camps. Four interconnected themes emerged including 1) individual level barriers, 2) cultural and religious barriers, 3) social and structural barriers, and 4) healthcare system barriers. Ninety percent of included studies were assessed as medium or high quality. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to address the diverse challenges faced by refugee women globally which hinder their access to cervical cancer screening. Strategies should include culturally sensitive awareness campaigns, active engagement of healthcare professionals, and structural reforms within healthcare systems to enhance cervical cancer screening uptake among refugee women.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 3","pages":"e0004225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cervical cancer disproportionately affects vulnerable populations including refugee women. Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake in this group is crucial to inform targeted interventions and improve health outcomes. This review aimed to identify barriers hindering their access to cervical cancer screening. Five databases - Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and SCOPUS - were searched in December 2024. The inclusion criteria included studies - a) targeting healthy refugee women, b) conducted in community or hospital/clinic settings, c) reporting barriers to cervical cancer screening from the women's perspective, and d) published in English. Thematic analysis was performed to identify the barriers. The review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eleven studies, seven from the USA, one from each of the UK, Australia, South Korea and Jordan, were included in this review. Of these, six were qualitative, three were quantitative and two were mixed methods studies. There was a consistent pattern of lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and cancer screening in refugee women. A unique barrier was women's negative experiences in refugee camps. Four interconnected themes emerged including 1) individual level barriers, 2) cultural and religious barriers, 3) social and structural barriers, and 4) healthcare system barriers. Ninety percent of included studies were assessed as medium or high quality. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to address the diverse challenges faced by refugee women globally which hinder their access to cervical cancer screening. Strategies should include culturally sensitive awareness campaigns, active engagement of healthcare professionals, and structural reforms within healthcare systems to enhance cervical cancer screening uptake among refugee women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Etiology of asymptomatic bacteriuria, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and associated risk factors among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in western Kenya. Disparities in anti-SARS-CoV-2 reactivity according to vaccines administered in the era of omicron in Cameroon: Lessons for future outbreak response. Fourth UNHLM on noncommunicable diseases 2025: An opportunity to bridge the transcending priorities for impact in global south. On the ethical and moral dimensions of using artificial intelligence for evidence synthesis. Overweight, obesity and physical inactivity among women of reproductive age in Eastern Nepal: a cross-sectional community-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1