Predicting amyloid beta accumulation in cognitively unimpaired older adults: Cognitive assessments provide no additional utility beyond demographic and genetic factors

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1002/alz.70036
Shu Liu, Paul Maruff, Martin Saint-Jalmes, Pierrick Bourgeat, Colin L. Masters, Benjamin Goudey, for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, and the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing
{"title":"Predicting amyloid beta accumulation in cognitively unimpaired older adults: Cognitive assessments provide no additional utility beyond demographic and genetic factors","authors":"Shu Liu,&nbsp;Paul Maruff,&nbsp;Martin Saint-Jalmes,&nbsp;Pierrick Bourgeat,&nbsp;Colin L. Masters,&nbsp;Benjamin Goudey,&nbsp;for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, and the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Flagship Study of Ageing","doi":"10.1002/alz.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\n \n <p>Integrating non-invasive measures to estimate abnormal amyloid beta accumulation (Aβ+) is key to developing a screening tool for preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). The predictive capability of standard neuropsychological tests in estimating Aβ+ has not been quantified.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>We constructed machine learning models using six cognitive measurements alongside demographic and genetic risk factors to predict Aβ status. Data were drawn from three cohorts: Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and Australian Imaging, Biomarker &amp; Lifestyle (AIBL) study. Internal validation was conducted within A4 with external validations in ADNI and AIBL to assess model generalizability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The highest area under the curve (AUC) for predicting Aβ+ was observed with demographic, genetic, and cognitive variables in A4 (median AUC = 0.745), but this was not significantly different from models without cognitive variables. External validation showed no improvement in ADNI and a slight decrease in AIBL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Standard neuropsychological tests do not significantly enhance Aβ+ prediction in cognitively unimpaired adults beyond demographic and genetic information.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Standard neuropsychological tests do not significantly improve the prediction of amyloid beta positivity (Aβ+) in cognitively unimpaired older adults beyond demographic and genetic information alone.</li>\n \n <li>Across three well-characterized cohorts, machine learning models incorporating cognitive measures failed to significantly improve Aβ+ prediction, indicating the limited relationship between cognitive performance on these tests and the risk of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD).</li>\n \n <li>These findings challenge assumptions about cognitive symptoms preceding Aβ+ screening and emphasize the need for developing more sensitive cognitive tests for early AD detection.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.70036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrating non-invasive measures to estimate abnormal amyloid beta accumulation (Aβ+) is key to developing a screening tool for preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). The predictive capability of standard neuropsychological tests in estimating Aβ+ has not been quantified.

METHODS

We constructed machine learning models using six cognitive measurements alongside demographic and genetic risk factors to predict Aβ status. Data were drawn from three cohorts: Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4), Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), and Australian Imaging, Biomarker & Lifestyle (AIBL) study. Internal validation was conducted within A4 with external validations in ADNI and AIBL to assess model generalizability.

RESULTS

The highest area under the curve (AUC) for predicting Aβ+ was observed with demographic, genetic, and cognitive variables in A4 (median AUC = 0.745), but this was not significantly different from models without cognitive variables. External validation showed no improvement in ADNI and a slight decrease in AIBL.

DISCUSSION

Standard neuropsychological tests do not significantly enhance Aβ+ prediction in cognitively unimpaired adults beyond demographic and genetic information.

Highlights

  • Standard neuropsychological tests do not significantly improve the prediction of amyloid beta positivity (Aβ+) in cognitively unimpaired older adults beyond demographic and genetic information alone.
  • Across three well-characterized cohorts, machine learning models incorporating cognitive measures failed to significantly improve Aβ+ prediction, indicating the limited relationship between cognitive performance on these tests and the risk of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD).
  • These findings challenge assumptions about cognitive symptoms preceding Aβ+ screening and emphasize the need for developing more sensitive cognitive tests for early AD detection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测认知功能未受损的老年人的β淀粉样蛋白积累:认知评估除了人口统计学和遗传因素外没有提供任何额外的效用
整合非侵入性测量来评估异常淀粉样蛋白积累(a β+)是开发临床前阿尔茨海默病(AD)筛查工具的关键。标准神经心理学测试在估计Aβ+方面的预测能力尚未量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Sleep disorders and sleep behaviors as predictors of neurodegenerative diseases Brain volume trajectories in young children are associated with polygenic scores for late‐onset Alzheimer's disease risk ARIAs are not random: A posterior and border‐zone vascular vulnerability model Sex differences in neuromodulatory subcortical systems and their implications for Alzheimer's disease Association of family and friend relationship satisfaction with incident dementia: A prospective cohort study of 104,093 participants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1