Using Science Communication Strategies to Close the Resource Gap in Under-Resourced Schools: a Design-Based Study Focusing on Rural Schools in South Africa
{"title":"Using Science Communication Strategies to Close the Resource Gap in Under-Resourced Schools: a Design-Based Study Focusing on Rural Schools in South Africa","authors":"Blessing Nemadziva, Catherine Cole, Steven Sexton","doi":"10.1007/s11165-025-10243-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper draws from our Science Material Development Project which was interested in understanding how engagement strategies used by science communicators in informal learning environments such as science museums could be used to improve science teaching and learning experiences in under-resourced schools. We demonstrate how the Complementarity of Learning Framework (Colfram), a design tool, was used to develop a simple Do-It-Yourself (DIY) science kit. We followed the design-based research methodology which had three stages: needs analysis, development of learning material, and evaluation of the designed learning material. A detailed needs analysis was conducted, focusing on Grade 9 natural sciences classes at three secondary schools from a rural district in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. Afterwards, a nucleotide blocks DIY science kit was developed and evaluated by the Grade 9 students and teachers at the same schools. Further evaluations were conducted by consulting five life science teachers based at urban schools in Durban, South Africa. Our results showed that the designed DIY science kit successfully facilitated effective science education experiences in under-resourced classrooms by eliciting the affective domain as well as affording teachers alternative approaches for content delivery. We also illustrated how the Colfram’s minimalist design approach may be suitable for teachers to use in designing their own inquiry-based learning material. Overall, the study demonstrated how engagement strategies from informal learning environments have the potential to offer cheaper, more accessible, and immediate interventions to help close the resource gap in under-resourced schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10243-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper draws from our Science Material Development Project which was interested in understanding how engagement strategies used by science communicators in informal learning environments such as science museums could be used to improve science teaching and learning experiences in under-resourced schools. We demonstrate how the Complementarity of Learning Framework (Colfram), a design tool, was used to develop a simple Do-It-Yourself (DIY) science kit. We followed the design-based research methodology which had three stages: needs analysis, development of learning material, and evaluation of the designed learning material. A detailed needs analysis was conducted, focusing on Grade 9 natural sciences classes at three secondary schools from a rural district in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa. Afterwards, a nucleotide blocks DIY science kit was developed and evaluated by the Grade 9 students and teachers at the same schools. Further evaluations were conducted by consulting five life science teachers based at urban schools in Durban, South Africa. Our results showed that the designed DIY science kit successfully facilitated effective science education experiences in under-resourced classrooms by eliciting the affective domain as well as affording teachers alternative approaches for content delivery. We also illustrated how the Colfram’s minimalist design approach may be suitable for teachers to use in designing their own inquiry-based learning material. Overall, the study demonstrated how engagement strategies from informal learning environments have the potential to offer cheaper, more accessible, and immediate interventions to help close the resource gap in under-resourced schools.
期刊介绍:
2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021
2020 Impact Factor: 5.439
Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus
2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus
Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership.
RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal.
You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research:
Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and
Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know.
RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted.
The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers.
Empircal contributions are:
Theoretically or conceptually grounded;
Relevant to science education theory and practice;
Highlight limitations of the study; and
Identify possible future research opportunities.
From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks.
Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is:
No longer than 6000 words, including references.
Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability;
Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education;
Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and
Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE.
While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.