Predictive modeling of pregnancy outcomes utilizing multiple machine learning techniques for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1186/s12884-025-07433-2
Ru Bai, Jia-Wei Li, Xia Hong, Xiao-Yue Xuan, Xiao-He Li, Ya Tuo
{"title":"Predictive modeling of pregnancy outcomes utilizing multiple machine learning techniques for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.","authors":"Ru Bai, Jia-Wei Li, Xia Hong, Xiao-Yue Xuan, Xiao-He Li, Ya Tuo","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07433-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the influencing factors of pregnancy outcomes during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) procedures in clinical practice. Several prediction models were constructed to predict pregnancy outcomes and models with higher accuracy were identified for potential implementation in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The clinical data and pregnancy outcomes of 2625 women who underwent fresh cycles of IVF-ET between 2016 and 2022 at the Reproductive Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University were enrolled to establish a comprehensive dataset. The observed features were preprocessed and analyzed. A predictive model for pregnancy outcomes of IVF-ET treatment was constructed based on the processed data. The dataset was divided into a training set and a test set in an 8:2 ratio. Predictive models for clinical pregnancy and clinical live births were developed. The ROC curve was plotted, and the AUC was calculated and the prediction model with the highest accuracy rate was selected from multiple models. The key features and main aspects of IVF-ET treatment outcome prediction were further analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical pregnancy outcome was categorized into pregnancy and live birth. The XGBoost model exhibited the highest AUC for predicting pregnancy, achieving a validated AUC of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.999-1.000). For predicting live births, the LightGBM model exhibited the highest AUC of 0.913 (95% CI: 0.895-0.930).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The XGBoost model predicted the possibility of pregnancy with an accuracy of up to 0.999. While the LightGBM model predicted the possibility of live birth with an accuracy of up to 0.913.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07433-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the influencing factors of pregnancy outcomes during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) procedures in clinical practice. Several prediction models were constructed to predict pregnancy outcomes and models with higher accuracy were identified for potential implementation in clinical settings.

Methods: The clinical data and pregnancy outcomes of 2625 women who underwent fresh cycles of IVF-ET between 2016 and 2022 at the Reproductive Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University were enrolled to establish a comprehensive dataset. The observed features were preprocessed and analyzed. A predictive model for pregnancy outcomes of IVF-ET treatment was constructed based on the processed data. The dataset was divided into a training set and a test set in an 8:2 ratio. Predictive models for clinical pregnancy and clinical live births were developed. The ROC curve was plotted, and the AUC was calculated and the prediction model with the highest accuracy rate was selected from multiple models. The key features and main aspects of IVF-ET treatment outcome prediction were further analyzed.

Results: The clinical pregnancy outcome was categorized into pregnancy and live birth. The XGBoost model exhibited the highest AUC for predicting pregnancy, achieving a validated AUC of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.999-1.000). For predicting live births, the LightGBM model exhibited the highest AUC of 0.913 (95% CI: 0.895-0.930).

Conclusion: The XGBoost model predicted the possibility of pregnancy with an accuracy of up to 0.999. While the LightGBM model predicted the possibility of live birth with an accuracy of up to 0.913.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Predictive modeling of pregnancy outcomes utilizing multiple machine learning techniques for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Pregnant women's knowledge, attitude, and practice toward food preservatives: a cross-sectional study. Relationship between food insecurity and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension: a prospective cohort study. Antenatal corticosteroid treatment after 34 weeks of gestation in twin pregnancies at high risk of late preterm delivery. Association between gestational diabetes mellitus and offspring health: a two-sample mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1