Comparison of modified Mallampati test with and without phonation for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation among adult surgical patients: cross-sectional study.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002836
Samson Yirga, Hirbo Samuel, Zekarias Markos, Wontagab Yohannes
{"title":"Comparison of modified Mallampati test with and without phonation for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation among adult surgical patients: cross-sectional study.","authors":"Samson Yirga, Hirbo Samuel, Zekarias Markos, Wontagab Yohannes","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The modified Mallampati test (MMT) is one of the most widely used airway assessment tests, for predicting laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation difficulty. The MMT without phonation is routinely performed, but its specificity in identifying easy intubation is controversial. This study aimed to compare the MMT with and without phonation in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in adult elective surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An institution-based cross-sectional study was performed on 258 adult elective surgical patients who required tracheal intubation. A systemic random sampling technique was employed to select study participants, and the MMT, with and without phonation, was performed during the preoperative assessment. A laryngoscopic view was recorded at the time of tracheal intubation and classified as easy or difficult for tracheal intubation. The collected data were entered into Epi-info and analyzed using the statistics package of social science software version 26. Statistical significance was defined as a <i>P</i> value of less than 0.05. This study used specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values as the statistical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of laryngoscopy and intubation difficulties was observed to be 13.6% and 10.5%, respectively. MMT conducted without phonation had the higher sensitivity for predicting difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, than MMT with phonation. But MMT performed with phonation had higher specificity for identifying easy intubation, than MMT without phonation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MMT with phonation has higher accuracy, specificity, and positive predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation than the non-phonation approach. MMT combined with phonation can be used as an alternative assessment tool to predict difficult airways.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 1","pages":"85-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The modified Mallampati test (MMT) is one of the most widely used airway assessment tests, for predicting laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation difficulty. The MMT without phonation is routinely performed, but its specificity in identifying easy intubation is controversial. This study aimed to compare the MMT with and without phonation in predicting difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in adult elective surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia.

Materials and methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was performed on 258 adult elective surgical patients who required tracheal intubation. A systemic random sampling technique was employed to select study participants, and the MMT, with and without phonation, was performed during the preoperative assessment. A laryngoscopic view was recorded at the time of tracheal intubation and classified as easy or difficult for tracheal intubation. The collected data were entered into Epi-info and analyzed using the statistics package of social science software version 26. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of less than 0.05. This study used specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values as the statistical measures.

Results: The prevalence of laryngoscopy and intubation difficulties was observed to be 13.6% and 10.5%, respectively. MMT conducted without phonation had the higher sensitivity for predicting difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, than MMT with phonation. But MMT performed with phonation had higher specificity for identifying easy intubation, than MMT without phonation.

Conclusion: The MMT with phonation has higher accuracy, specificity, and positive predictive value for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation than the non-phonation approach. MMT combined with phonation can be used as an alternative assessment tool to predict difficult airways.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良Mallampati试验在预测成人手术患者喉镜检查和插管困难中的应用:横断面研究。
背景:改良Mallampati试验(MMT)是应用最广泛的气道评估试验之一,用于预测喉镜检查和气管插管困难。无发声的MMT是常规操作,但其识别容易插管的特异性是有争议的。本研究旨在比较有发声和没有发声的MMT在预测接受全身麻醉的成人择期手术患者喉镜检查和气管插管困难方面的作用。材料和方法:对258例需要气管插管的成人择期手术患者进行了一项基于机构的横断面研究。采用系统随机抽样技术选择研究参与者,在术前评估期间进行MMT,有和没有发音。气管插管时记录喉镜观察,并将气管插管分为易插管和难插管。将收集到的数据输入Epi-info,使用社会科学软件26版统计软件包进行分析。统计学显著性定义为P值小于0.05。本研究采用特异性、敏感性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值作为统计指标。结果:喉镜检查和插管困难发生率分别为13.6%和10.5%。与有发声的MMT相比,无发声的MMT在预测喉镜检查和插管困难方面具有更高的敏感性。但有发声的MMT比无发声的MMT对易插管的特异性更高。结论:发声MMT对困难喉镜及插管的准确性、特异性及阳性预测价值均高于非发声MMT。MMT结合发音可作为预测困难气道的替代评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic role of Ki-67 expression in distinguishing thyroid follicular carcinoma from follicular adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Long-term safety and effectiveness of hybrid coronary revascularization compared to conventional revascularization strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Assessing photo-specific social media, body dissatisfaction, anxiety, and depression: a nationwide cross-sectional study on adolescents and young adults. Magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for GERD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes. Epigenomic excision for proteus nevus lipomatosis, rare PTEN overgrowth, and robotic debulking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1