Steven Liew, Derek Jones, Steven Dayan, Sabrina Fabi, Alexander Rivkin, Brian Biesman, Tanya Brandstetter, Grace Pan, Julia K Garcia, Elisabeth Lee, Beta Bowen, Mitchell F Brin
{"title":"A Controlled Phase 2b Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intervention of OnabotulinumtoxinA for Treating Masseter Muscle Prominence.","authors":"Steven Liew, Derek Jones, Steven Dayan, Sabrina Fabi, Alexander Rivkin, Brian Biesman, Tanya Brandstetter, Grace Pan, Julia K Garcia, Elisabeth Lee, Beta Bowen, Mitchell F Brin","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Masseter muscle prominence (MMP) is a benign condition characterized by a wide, square, or trapezoidal lower facial shape, which may be considered undesirable.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) efficacy and safety for MMP treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a phase 2b study, adults with investigator- and participant-assessed bilateral grade 4/5 MMP on the 5-grade MMP Scale (MMPS) and MMPS-Participant, respectively, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single intramuscular injection of onabotA 48 U, 72 U, or placebo in the masseter muscles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving investigator-assessed MMPS grade ≤3 at day 90. Adverse events were monitored throughout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects received onabotA 48 U (n=53), 72 U (n=46), or placebo (n=46). Significantly greater proportions achieved MMPS grade ≤3 with onabotA vs placebo (90.6%, 91.3%, and 21.7% for onabotA 48 U, 72 U, and placebo, respectively, at day 90; P<0.0001). Improvements in lower facial volume, width, and angle were significantly greater for onabotA vs placebo at all timepoints. At day 90, the proportion of subjects perceiving improvements was significantly greater with onabotA treatment vs placebo. Significantly more subjects were \"satisfied/very satisfied\" with onabotA vs placebo through day 180. Treatment was well tolerated; both onabotA groups had a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Nasopharyngitis (onabotA, 3.9% vs placebo, 0%) and upper respiratory infection (2.9% vs 0%, respectively) were the most common TEAEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One injection of onabotA 48 U or 72 U was well tolerated and effective in reducing MMP severity as assessed by investigators and subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Masseter muscle prominence (MMP) is a benign condition characterized by a wide, square, or trapezoidal lower facial shape, which may be considered undesirable.
Objectives: To evaluate onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) efficacy and safety for MMP treatment.
Methods: In a phase 2b study, adults with investigator- and participant-assessed bilateral grade 4/5 MMP on the 5-grade MMP Scale (MMPS) and MMPS-Participant, respectively, were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single intramuscular injection of onabotA 48 U, 72 U, or placebo in the masseter muscles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving investigator-assessed MMPS grade ≤3 at day 90. Adverse events were monitored throughout.
Results: Subjects received onabotA 48 U (n=53), 72 U (n=46), or placebo (n=46). Significantly greater proportions achieved MMPS grade ≤3 with onabotA vs placebo (90.6%, 91.3%, and 21.7% for onabotA 48 U, 72 U, and placebo, respectively, at day 90; P<0.0001). Improvements in lower facial volume, width, and angle were significantly greater for onabotA vs placebo at all timepoints. At day 90, the proportion of subjects perceiving improvements was significantly greater with onabotA treatment vs placebo. Significantly more subjects were "satisfied/very satisfied" with onabotA vs placebo through day 180. Treatment was well tolerated; both onabotA groups had a similar incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Nasopharyngitis (onabotA, 3.9% vs placebo, 0%) and upper respiratory infection (2.9% vs 0%, respectively) were the most common TEAEs.
Conclusions: One injection of onabotA 48 U or 72 U was well tolerated and effective in reducing MMP severity as assessed by investigators and subjects.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.