The effect of propranolol on cesarean section rate in prolonged labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002825
Oadi N Shrateh, Ashna Habib, Zainab Nazir, Zahraa M M Zeer, Tooba Ali, Saleh Matter, Sadeq F S Tanina, Mashhour Naasan
{"title":"The effect of propranolol on cesarean section rate in prolonged labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Oadi N Shrateh, Ashna Habib, Zainab Nazir, Zahraa M M Zeer, Tooba Ali, Saleh Matter, Sadeq F S Tanina, Mashhour Naasan","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propranolol is widely recognized as a nonselective β-adrenergic receptor blocker known to enhance uterine activity in both pregnant and non-pregnant women. Prolonged labor and serious concerns about maternal and neonatal health prompted us to investigate medical issues. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of propranolol on cesarean deliveries during prolonged labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 1 November 2023. We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients receiving intrapartum propranolol during prolonged labor. Unadjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a fixed-effects model. The I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to measure and assess heterogeneity. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery rate, and secondary outcomes included Apgar score, cord arterial pH, neonatal birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, postpartum hemorrhage, and composite maternal and neonatal morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 704 identified articles, six were included in the meta-analyses. There was a significant difference in cesarean deliveries between propranolol and placebo (RR 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.09, <i>P</i> = 0.02). In addition, there was no significant difference between study groups in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis, a notable reduction in cesarean rates was observed when propranolol was given to women in prolonged labor. The results of this meta-analysis show that the use of propranolol safely reduces the need for cesarean deliveries due to labor arrest disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 2","pages":"838-846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Propranolol is widely recognized as a nonselective β-adrenergic receptor blocker known to enhance uterine activity in both pregnant and non-pregnant women. Prolonged labor and serious concerns about maternal and neonatal health prompted us to investigate medical issues. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effect of propranolol on cesarean deliveries during prolonged labor.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 1 November 2023. We included randomized clinical trials that evaluated maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients receiving intrapartum propranolol during prolonged labor. Unadjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a fixed-effects model. The I2 statistic was used to measure and assess heterogeneity. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery rate, and secondary outcomes included Apgar score, cord arterial pH, neonatal birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, postpartum hemorrhage, and composite maternal and neonatal morbidity.

Results: Of the 704 identified articles, six were included in the meta-analyses. There was a significant difference in cesarean deliveries between propranolol and placebo (RR 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.09, P = 0.02). In addition, there was no significant difference between study groups in secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, a notable reduction in cesarean rates was observed when propranolol was given to women in prolonged labor. The results of this meta-analysis show that the use of propranolol safely reduces the need for cesarean deliveries due to labor arrest disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
期刊最新文献
Erratum: A "Mismatched" Connection: a Rare Case of Indirect or Dural Carotid-cavernous Fistula: a Case Based Review: Erratum. Erratum: Social Determinants of Self-Medication Practice by Caregivers Among Pediatrics Population in Pakistan: A Logistic Regression Analysis of a Prospective Cross-Sectional Study: Retraction. Erratum: Spinal hydatid disease: a case report - an uncommon differential diagnosis in LMICs: Erratum. Single right sided traumatic avulsion fracture of both ASIS and AIIS: case review. Lacrimal sac rhinosporidiosis presented as nasal obstruction symptoms without any ocular manifestations: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1